Bugs item #120, was opened at 2006-09-09 23:09
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684975&aid=120&group_id=119783
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Patches item #1555483, was opened at 2006-09-09 21:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684977&aid=1555483&group_id=119783
Please note that this message will contain a full co
yes, I'll do
Juergen
On 9/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juergen are you going to merge this in? seems like a good idea. changing all
> the tests can be done with a search and repace? or is it more
> complicated/time consuming?
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
> On 9/9/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[
I am curious that if it is really needed that a context path just always must end with "/" If that is the case then that patch is not correct because it is very funny that when the servlet path = ""
that you add a "/" to the context path.. That is strange.If the context path just always have to end
Juergen are you going to merge this in? seems like a good idea. changing all the tests can be done with a search and repace? or is it more complicated/time consuming?-Igor
On 9/9/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/9/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> * Juergen
Thanks for another patch Jean-Baptiste. Would you mind creating a bug
report for this, so that we can track it, have a nicer changes report,
etc?
Cheers,
Eelco
On 9/9/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Wicket Developers,
>
> I discovered a serious problem in Wicket 1.
Hello Wicket Developers,
I discovered a serious problem in Wicket 1.2 while my Wicket app
went in production.
Previously I was using "" (root context) in the servlet container
configuration, and servlet mapping "/*" in web.xml. It works
great. You may be surprised, but yes, it works.
On 9/9/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Juergen Donnerstag:
> > I understand this to be refactoring and that all existing unit tests
> > for wicket are still working?
>
> That's right the wicket unit tests should be updated to replace:
>
> new WicketTester()
>
> with:
>
> new
* Juergen Donnerstag:
> I understand this to be refactoring and that all existing unit tests
> for wicket are still working?
That's right the wicket unit tests should be updated to replace:
new WicketTester()
with:
new WebApplicationTester(new DummyApplication())
> Can this approach be applied
Feature Requests item #1555278, was opened at 2006-09-09 15:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684978&aid=1555278&group_id=119783
Please note that this message will contain
10 matches
Mail list logo