Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

apache vote is in progress here:http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11564030092&r=1&w=2-Igor On 8/24/06, Alexandre Bairos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ x ] Yes, let's go ApacheGo!On 8/21/06, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,(...)The time is now to vote whether we should get on with

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[ x ] Yes, let's go ApacheGo!On 8/21/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,(...)The time is now to vote whether we should get on with this. Wicket's committers are the only ones having binding votes. But if you want toair support or concerns, please do. If this proposal passes, the

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

Let me share my point of view:[X] Yes, let's go ApacheOn 8/22/06, Davy De Durpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:[X] Yes, let's go Apache[  ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives That'll bring us closer to struts ;-)--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/VOTE%3A-incubatio

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache [ ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives That'll bring us closer to struts ;-) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/VOTE%3A-incubation-at-Apache-tf2141169.html#a5925372 Sent from the Wicket - Dev forum at Nabble.com. ---

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache[  ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives -- Ingram ChenJava [EMAIL PROTECTED]Institue of BioMedical Sciences Academia Sinica Taiwanblog: http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache I think it will add to Wicket's visibility and credibility. Good move. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/VOTE%3A-incubation-at-Apache-tf2141169.html#a5916272 Sent from the Wicket - Dev forum at Nabble.com. ---

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

Not being a committer may I still add my voice?[X] Yes, let's go Apache[  ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternativesIt's a unanimous vote so lets go guys!!F On 8/21/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,Some time ago we announced that we started negotiations with Apache

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

This is my non-binding vote: [ x ] Yes, let's go Apache - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download I

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > Hi all, > > Some time ago we announced that we started negotiations with Apache to > start an incubation process. That basically means we would be entering > a 'test period' where we proof ourselves to fit in as an Apache > process, adhering

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache Jan Eelco Hillenius wrote: >Hi all, > >Some time ago we announced that we started negotiations with Apache to >start an incubation process. That basically means we would be entering >a 'test period' where we proof ourselves to fit in as an Apache >process, adhering Apac

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache[  ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives - Frank - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to mak

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

> [ X] Yes, let´s go party^H^H^H^H^HApache > [ ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives /Gwyn -- Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! - http://wicketframework.org - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache [ ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives Let's see where this takes us. Martijn -- Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! Embed Wicket components in your portals! -- http://wicketframework.org --

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache [ ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives Ate Eelco Hillenius wrote: > Hi all, > > Some time ago we announced that we started negotiations with Apache to > start an incubation process. That basically means we would be entering > a 'test period' where we

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apachelets join the old boys club.On 8/21/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hi all,Some time ago we announced that we started negotiations with Apache to start an incubation process. That basically means we would be enteringa 'test period' where we proof ourselves to

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache [ ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives Juergen On 8/21/06, Dirk Markert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [X] Yes, let's go Apache > > Dirk > > 2006/8/21, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi all, > > > > Some time ago we announced that we started ne

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go ApacheDirk2006/8/21, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi all,Some time ago we announced that we started negotiations with Apache tostart an incubation process. That basically means we would be enteringa 'test period' where we proof ourselves to fit in as an Apache process, adh

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[ x ] Yes, let's go Apache [ ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives Eelco - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology t

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache [ ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives -Matej // Although I still think Wicket Foundation sounds cool :-)) Eelco Hillenius wrote: > Hi all, > > Some time ago we announced that we started negotiations with Apache to > start an incubation process. That

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

On 21.8.2006, at 19.06, Eelco Hillenius wrote:[ x] Yes, let's go Apache[  ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternativesJanne- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done qu

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

[X] Yes, let's go Apache[  ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives-IgorOn 8/21/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Here's my non-binding vote:> [XX] Yes, let's go Apache > [  ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives-- Jean-Baptiste Quenotaka  John

Re: [Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

Here's my non-binding vote: > [XX] Yes, let's go Apache > [ ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ - Using Tomcat but need to do

[Wicket-develop] VOTE: incubation at Apache

Hi all, Some time ago we announced that we started negotiations with Apache to start an incubation process. That basically means we would be entering a 'test period' where we proof ourselves to fit in as an Apache process, adhering Apache's rules for creating distributions, voting, etc. The propos