Hi,
I'm just looking into Wicket and noticed the nice cdapp demo at
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-contrib-examples/cdapp.
However I seems that this demo app is not available for download?
Is this correct, and if not what is the location to download it from?
Regards,
Marcel
I've got an unusual use-case for a page and I'm confused about how to
accomplish this in Wicket. However, it seems to be that it should be
completely doable, even if I need to hack some stuff a bit.
I have a page, (say, http://www.foo.com/foo). Every time I come back to
that page, it should
You could try:
page.setVersioned(false)
I'm not a wicket-guru though.
Erik.
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile
no this won't help
this only stops the page from tracking changed to the page itself (model
data or component changes)
johan
Erik van Oosten wrote:
You could try:
page.setVersioned(false)
I'm not a wicket-guru though.
Erik.
---
if you want to disable the back button then you have to do some
javascripting to disabled it.
I think some of the forums made examples for this.
Dan Gould wrote:
I've got an unusual use-case for a page and I'm confused about how to
accomplish this in Wicket. However, it seems to be that it
Oh guys, why do you all make it so complicated?
We already had a very good solution like:
Button with onClick() and SubmitButton with onSubmit().
So i think this is much better and cleaner (and less confusing) than
what we got now.
This would be realy important to me since it would be a step
Hmm, it doesn't look to be available for download as a package,
certainly, however, it's available via CVS. Details of CVS access
here - http://wicket-stuff.sourceforge.net/cvs-usage.html, with the
web view of the repositry here -
Hi,
Is there any way i can add anon-breaking
space in a list view.
I want to output
TDnbsp;/TD.
Dipu
Hi,
I'm trying to display a grid of images, for example 4 columns and 3
rows of images, where each cell is a different entry retrieved from
the database with a different index/id.
I took a look at the DisplayTag example and PageableDataView's
source-code and they don't seem to be quite
I'm warming up to the idea of adding Cayenne implementation classes to
the wicket-contrib-database project. Without another implementation,
you really can't say it is ORM tool agnostic. One problem is that the
project has some maven dependencies that don't seem to be resolvable
-- at least with
On 8/12/05, Dan Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got an unusual use-case for a page and I'm confused about how to
accomplish this in Wicket. However, it seems to be that it should be
completely doable, even if I need to hack some stuff a bit.
I have a page, (say, http://www.foo.com/foo).
This is what I am currently trying to do. I do not like that Wicket
creates a new instance of component each time when I navigate to it. I
this is just not true. If you navigate you are pressing links that you
have created
And what you do in that link is complete up to you.
Just set a new
this is an accident:
@Id(generate = GeneratorType.AUTO)
DatabaseObject is a handy class for hibernate.
if cayenne does not work this way, it can be moved
to hibernate package. if cayenne requires some
interface, there would be no use for that in hibernate
and that should be moved to
Dave, the two class approach does not work as I found out yesterday. Ie how
are you going to refactor the ImageButton class, are you going to make it a
SubmitButton or just a Button? Or are you going to make it abstract and
derive two concrete classes from it? The two class approach is messy.
Here is the quick and dirty solution. Is there enough interest to build a
full blown grid component?
final int cols=7;
final int rowsPerPage=5;
add(new PageableDataView(grid, new ContactDataProvider(),
cols*rowsPerPage) {
Cayenne doesn't require an interface. I just thought that some of the
code in the generic class might depend on the getId and setId methods
in DatabaseObject, but I guess it doesn't.
On 8/12/05, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is an accident:
@Id(generate =
On 8/12/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what I am currently trying to do. I do not like that Wicket
creates a new instance of component each time when I navigate to it. I
this is just not true. If you navigate you are pressing links that you
have created
And what
can we leave it then?
we can remove dependency on javax.persistence if you like.
Jon Carlson wrote:
Cayenne doesn't require an interface. I just thought that some of the
code in the generic class might depend on the getId and setId methods
in DatabaseObject, but I guess it doesn't.
On
or maybe it really belongs in hibernate package since it uses
persistence annotations
and that's specific to hibernate...
Jon Carlson wrote:
Cayenne doesn't require an interface. I just thought that some of the
code in the generic class might depend on the getId and setId methods
in
I'm thinking it belongs in hibernate, although I rather like being
able to assume there is a getId and a setId method for each db object,
but maybe that is too limiting for general use?
If we find it necessary, we can create an IDatabaseObject interface at
a later point in time.
On 8/12/05,
In SignIn example link look like this: a href=signinsignin/a As
you can see, there is no additional parameters, it simply navigates to
signIn. WebRequestCycle considers this link as a homepage, and calls
setResponsePage(homePage). At least in this case Wicket does not
create a new instance. But
add(new Label(id,
"nbsp;").setEscapeModelObjectStrings(false));
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
DipuSent: Friday, August 12, 2005 4:44 AMTo:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: [Wicket-user]
non-breaking space - nbsp; in list view
i think it's probably too limiting. people may have their own domain
objects.
it's a handy base class for the hibernate package with the annotations
and all,
but there's no good reason to have it in the generic package
Jon Carlson wrote:
I'm thinking it belongs in hibernate, although I
i went ahead and moved this to
wicket.contrib.database.hibernate.HibernateDatabaseObject
Jonathan Locke wrote:
i think it's probably too limiting. people may have their own domain
objects.
it's a handy base class for the hibernate package with the annotations
and all,
but there's no
On 8/12/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In SignIn example link look like this: a href=signinsignin/a As
you can see, there is no additional parameters, it simply navigates to
signIn. WebRequestCycle considers this link as a homepage, and calls
setResponsePage(homePage). At
I'm on vacation next week. I may get some of the Cayenne impl done
while away, but probably not until after I get back.
- Jon
On 8/12/05, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i went ahead and moved this to
wicket.contrib.database.hibernate.HibernateDatabaseObject
Jonathan Locke wrote:
Er.. I mean ColumnedDataProvider, or something that is closer to actual English.
On 8/12/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if we made a RowsDataProvider that returned detachable lists as
the models? That way you could plug that into anything and get
columns.
On 8/12/05, Igor
ok
Jon Carlson wrote:
I'm on vacation next week. I may get some of the Cayenne impl done
while away, but probably not until after I get back.
- Jon
On 8/12/05, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i went ahead and moved this to
Wow, that's a good one. I guess there are also others who need it and
facing the implementation (I couldn't have done it this way) I think there
is a need.
I was acutally thinking along the lines of implementing a
PageableOrderedRepeatingView and than nest another OrderedRepeatingView.
What
Hopefully when the new paging impl is done there wont be a need for
Pageable-pairs :)
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian Essl
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 10:37 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
I think a photo-gallery is a good use case. Just a grid of panels with a
picture and some other info inside.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian Essl
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 10:37 AM
To:
Hi,
Has anyone ever seen this error before? Any idea why it occurs or how
to fix it?
13:47:39,140 ERROR ManagerBase:411 - IOException while loading persisted
sessions: java.io.InvalidClassException: wicket.Component; local class
incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID =
I think that may be the best way to go, although you should extend
pageabledataview instead. Then you'd be in trouble if you wanted to
use a plain dataview, but at least you would just have more
functionality then you need, not less.
My first though was something like the attached file, but now
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 8/12/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't like bookmarkable urls as they are now. First, they look ugly.
Second, the page is shown directly without redirection. On the
contrary, I want to send a command to a page, so it would process it,
and
this is just because you did shutdown tomcat
then upgraded wicket (cvs update)
and then started tomcat again.
We can fix this but then we need to put serialVersionUID in every wicket
component/model.
and i think his is removed (we did have that i believe)
So yes upgrading wicket by shutdown
No it is not the same issue again.
However I was thinking about it and somehow realized that most of pagable
db views have identical rows (with different data of course).
So I though maybe even a stronger optimization than optimized item
removal, would be to build at the start of DataView
Oh yes. This should be before 1.1 and idea?
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:48:47 -0700, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hopefully when the new paging impl is done there wont be a need for
Pageable-pairs :)
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
i will start first impl this weekend
Christian Essl wrote:
Oh yes. This should be before 1.1 and idea?
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:48:47 -0700, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully when the new paging impl is done there wont be a need for
Pageable-pairs :)
-Igor
-Original
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian Essl
No it is not the same issue again.
However I was thinking about it and somehow realized that
most of pagable db views have identical rows (with different
data of course).
So
On 8/12/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
I would prefer that for pages which are not versioned and have only
one instance, the url would be built using context root + Page name.
Of course, page name should be uniqie, and I do not want to use full
On 8/12/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no one objects, I will give some attention to the urls, since ugly
urls drive me crazy ;-)
i and i know almost all core developers of wicket really don't care.
Why is that so important ? I really don't get that.
Of course, Wicket
fyi, everyone... i have started the refactor we talked about on feedback
components.
this is going to be a lot better...
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA *
I just have mentioned before that this syntax is for non-versioned
single-instance pages. Versioned pages will get version parameter,
multiple-instance pages will get path parameter. Oh, by the way, I
know that semantically these are different, but is it possible to
combine indexes for version
I think this should be somehow possible to do, without altering wicket
in any way. I'd like to see your progress here :)
There is a problem, though, that Johan has already pointed out, that if
you use syntax like /signin/home, etc.. You have to treat all urls in
your markup (images,
www.amazon.com/books/subjects/computers/webdev
www.amazon.com/books/subjects/computers
www.amazon.com/books/subjects
www.amazon.com/books
Those links are bookmarkable pages you jump directly inside a point in
an application.
and there we agree it would be nice to have some kind of
by the way, if you select Books Subjects, Amazon shows the
Subjects page. But if you select any other category beneath Books
Subjects, Amazon shows same page layout. Obviously, they did not want
to create a separate page for all categories, and they use one
template with different database data.
Hi,
I'd like to commit Netbeans projects for wicket-stuff alongside the
Eclipse ones. I think you guys assigned me commit rights to that project
many months ago but I don't recall the login/password information. Who
do I contact about this?
Thanks,
Gili
--
http://www.desktopbeautifier.com/
Use your sourceforge.net login and password. If you don't remember contact
sourceforge.net or try to recover online.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gili
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:40:02 -0700, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
The optmized-item-removal in the context of the dataview is not really an
optimization. It is a way for you to keep state in your dataitems and all
attached items across requests. So for
Can anyone please help me out with the Clustering with wickte and tomcat?
I tried everything which was mentioned in the Wiki-Page but nothing works.
The normal servlet session (I tried it with a normal JSP site) works in
cluster mode.
But wiket sessions don't work, even not with the patch from
How many annoyed users is needed to remove 'final' ? I understand the
why 'final' is there, but I don't find it reasonable enough. Why treat
Wicket users as idiots (though sometimes they probably are) who
cannot properly override a method?
For example, I wanted to create my own version of
Explain the benefits of your approach as opposed to the current
implementation - I cant think of any off the top of my head.
As far as collections go, performance wise I think you would be better off
transforming it to a list first or to an array and writing an ArrayAdapter.
Assuming your
of what do you mean? the DefaultPageFactory?
If you want one you should just make youre own.
Jonathan has already explain with pretty long emails why we have final
So please search these mailing list.
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
How many annoyed users is needed to remove 'final' ? I understand
Any thoughts on the following scenario?
ListView A has a list of incompleteToDo items. ListView B, which is
empty, contains a list of complete ToDo items. When the user clicks a
link, the ToDo item is flagged as completed and should be moved to
ListView B. For some reason, the first object I
How about a little bit of code so we can see what you are doing.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nick Heudecker
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 12:59 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] Moving
On 8/12/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan has already explain with pretty long emails why we have final
So please search these mailing list.
I know, I know... I've read the faq.
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:57:37 -0700, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Explain the benefits of your approach as opposed to the current
implementation - I cant think of any off the top of my head.
Because you can use any object not just a string. This means you can
provide optimized item
Use your sourceforge.net login and password. If you don't remember contact
sourceforge.net or try to recover online.
Ok, that worked but now I don't have CVS write access into dataview and
other modules I'm trying to commit into. I'm simply trying to add
Netbeans4.2 (and a bunch of files
I will do some thinking about all this and present you all the solution
i found at the beginning of the next week.
Hopfully you will be all glad (well of course never _all_ will be happy,
but at least the most of you) and we can end the discussion and i can go
on with the implementation.
Cu,
Umm did you check out the project using the DEVELOPER access (via ssh) or
via PUBLIC (pserver) ?
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gili
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 2:06 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE:
Does anyone know why this list gets spammed so often? It seems like I get more spams from this list than most others...
Why don't you implement it and email us the patch. That way we can all take
a look at it and see if it works.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian Essl
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 1:48 PM
To:
62 matches
Mail list logo
