On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 23:55 -0800, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
maybe a static factory method in the page is the cleanest solution.
public class MyPage extends WebPage {
private MyPage(String param) {
}
public static MyPage(String param) {
return new MyPage(param);
If you wan't to contribute, feel free to do so. :)
Erm... he doesn't have commit rights? :)
I think it is an open RFE to upgrade this js files, right?
Eelco
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
yes, did not htink about that...
please request a build and we will be able to update it.
Marco
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
If you wan't to contribute, feel free to do so. :)
Erm... he doesn't have commit rights? :)
I think it is an open RFE to upgrade this js files, right?
Eelco
As we say in Australia -
you little ripper mate.
listItem.setRenderOnly(true) did
it.
Thanks mate
Kevin
From: Igor Vaynberg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2005
3:50 PMTo: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re:
[Wicket-user] Trying to be clever with a
I have it working Dojo Dropdown's (thanks to Igor for the magic
listItem.setRenderBodyOnly(true))
I did a bit of an ugly cludge to save me having to go new PageLink(link,
Blah) - I've create a MenuLink extends Link
I can convert it to JDK1.4.2 easy enough. Who shoud I send the code to? We'd
you can mail it either to me, [EMAIL PROTECTED], or to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am sorry to say that we are currently up to
our necks in fixing annoying bugs, wrestling with sourceforge, and
writing our graduation report. I expect that we will not have time to
add and especialy to restructure right
We've released a SNAPSHOT release of wicket-contrib-dojo, which is not
much more then our 0.3 release with a few fixes:
-maven building should work now for both contrib-dojo and
contrib-dojo-examples
-the examples WAR file should be deployable in a Jetty instance now
-FXValidationAjaxHandler
I haven't had a chance to use it yet. I'm swamped with some other stuff I need to do. Sorry--AndrewOn 11/30/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:any feedback on this yet? if not, i guess i will polish it with its current feature set and that will be that.
-IgorOn 11/23/05, Andrew Berman
On 11/30/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any feedback on this yet? if not, i guess i will polish it with its current
feature set and that will be that.
Is it in HEAD now? I've already switched to 1.2 :(
Cheers,
--
Davide Savazzi
yes it is in head, and also in 1.1 branch.-IgorOn 11/30/05, Davide Savazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:On 11/30/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: any feedback on this yet? if not, i guess i will polish it with its current feature set and that will be that.Is it in HEAD now? I've already
Maybe it's in a cache somewhere locally, or you build it without
issues maven clean first (which you should always do in order to have
a clean build).
To fix it: test with a SNAPSHOT first. If that works and you don't
want to make a new release (/and/ you didn't upload the version
anywhere yet,
If you were able to go to JavaOne, and was deciding which framework to
use, and one of the presentations is about Wicket, what kind of
information do you want to hear so you would give it a try? Or even
better, what kind of info are you looking for in the program so you
attend such a session?
I'm
Just out of my head:
- ease of development
- basic CRUD app with Spring/Hibernate or EJB3
- how to test
- AJAX support
- in light of this comparison to Tapestry and JSF
Hope you get more feedback,
Christian
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:48:04 +0100, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If
I'd like to see a big picture overview of how it works and what's
required from the development standpoint. And I'm actually talking
about pictures and graphics.
On 11/30/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you were able to go to JavaOne, and was deciding which framework to
use,
I have some Java application development experience, but my
web development experience is very small (mainly just a few simple servlets). At
my new job I am tasked with translating an architecturally simple ASP.NET
application to J2EE (the company wants to standardize on Java). Im working
Thanks for the tip. I'll use this when my constructors get too long.
Christian
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:47:42 +0200, Joni Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Unfortunately the instrumentation does not help here. I'm using getters
at constructors to overcome this issue.
public class MyPanel
Hi Frank,
I don't think there are any limitations regarding which version of
Tomcat you can use. I'm currently using it with Java 5 and Tomcat 5.x
and haven't had any problems. My IDE is IDEA, but you should be fine
with anything.
I started using Wicket after coming over from building a number
Hi Frank,
I'm working alone, and
have a lot of freedom in the tools and frameworks I choose.
That's the best job :)
Wicket sounds like a good approach – said to be easier to learn and use than
JSP/Struts or JSF; and I could cannibalize the html generated by the ASP.NET
pages, insert Wicket
18 matches
Mail list logo
