Only very little performance impact.
Wicket automatically creates a Link component for you and the
disable behavior is exactly the same as for for Links. And Links get
disabled if they point to the same page. If you don't want that
behavior, than you can not use autolinks. Just add standard
In wicket 1.2 you just have to add this line of code:
throw new RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(YourFancyErrorPage.class);
I'm not sure if this one will work with wicket version prior to 1.2, but
then it might be worth the upgrade ;-)
--
View this message in context:
We can't disabled lastModified for that kind of stuff. We need a last modified timestamp for the http HEAD request for resources inside jarsWe could cache that result if we see that it comes from a jar. But as i said then we have
to make sure that we have some sort of soluton for OSGI containers
Thanks. That was what I needed.
In wicket 1.2 you just have to add this line of code:
throw new RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException
(YourFancyErrorPage.class);
I'm not sure if this one will work with wicket version prior to
1.2, but
then it might be worth the upgrade ;-)
i dont think its a bug. autolinking is based on page's class, so if you have multiple links to the same page class with different parameters they will all be disabled. one more disadvantage of using wicket:link to do it automatically. if you used a link component you created you could override the
Hi,
is there any automatic-pre-render-method-invocation I can use to
check conditions and add feedback?
I tried onBeforeRender(). This seems to be to late to modify content?!
I tried onAttach(). Here I have a strange phenomenon: The new
feedback is not displayed, but I have an
Hi,
What should happen when AjaxRequest is issued and session has expired? In my app nothing happens at all.
/arto
Ha! found a bug
there is one parameter missing when generating ajax-response...
Signature in wicket-ajax.js is: function wicketSubmitFormById(formId, url, submitButton, successHandler, failureHandler) {
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.getEventHandler() has now:
return getCallbackScript(new
In my markup, I have added a RequiredTextField component called
message. I also use the wicket:message tag. Wicket seems to get
them confused. Is this a bug?
wicket.markup.MarkupException: Component message must be applied to a
tag of type 'input', not 'wicket:message key=phone' (line
Igor,
do you know RIFE/Continuations? It uses continuations for better state
handling and control flow instead of better performance.
There are some examples in this slide (pages 5 to 8):
https://www.dev.java.net/files/documents/204/3120/rife_fosdem_2004.pdf
It really looks like an
However, the session passed to the backend isn't always the same one,
causing the back-end to throw exceptions.
Then there is something wrong that is not Wicket related. Wicket just
passes/ uses the underlying httpSession.
Is there something i can do to
maintain the httpSession (and keep it
I can't speak for Igor - though we have talked about that too - but
for my opion see e.g.
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=39579#204913
Basically, I think continuations are a smart idea, and they might be
useful for wizard/ flow type applications. That said, I also think
heh, so why post to this thread and not start a new one?-IgorOn 4/14/06, Timo Stamm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Igor Vaynberg schrieb: what do rife's continuations have to do with ajax?
Nothing. On 4/14/06, Timo Stamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, do you know RIFE/Continuations? It uses
Eelco Hillenius schrieb:
I can't speak for Igor - though we have talked about that too - but
for my opion see e.g.
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=39579#204913
Thanks for the link.
mind you that Wicket allows for very fancy state optimizations as
well.
Quoting from
the problem with the word continuation is that it has recently aquired multiple meanings.in rife, afaik, the continations are used to drive program flow. that is, the continuation remembers where in the function you are and can resume from that point forward. this is basically an abstraction of a
i dont see how this spreads the logic around. your navigation logic would be isolated in an object that will drive the flow and the steps are reusable panels.i wrote a wizard framework for the company i work for, and we have been using it with great success. it is driven by a general workflow like
16 matches
Mail list logo
