Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

I guess it depends on what job you are in. It is nice for the person who has to maintain the properties. If I were a html designer I'd rather prefer a default text like "save" or whatever, which btw applies if no property is found. Juergen On 5/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: why

Re: [Wicket-user] How to overrite Application.properties properly?

foo/pkg/    MyWebApplication.properties    MyWebApplication.javafoo/pkg/pages    FooPage.properties    FooPage.html     FooPage.javaShould work. Can you see if you can reproduce in a wicket quickstart?MartijnOn 5/9/06, Bruno Borges < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I have changed the TypeValidator message

Re: [Wicket-user] component input handling

im off to bed, so maybe the night crew can take care of this.-IgorOn 5/8/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:thanxwhat about using getConvertedInput and getRawInput rather than directly using the variables? Igor Vaynberg wrote:> i was just looking at that. i think we messed up a little bit th

Re: [Wicket-user] component input handling

thanx what about using getConvertedInput and getRawInput rather than directly using the variables? Igor Vaynberg wrote: i was just looking at that. i think we messed up a little bit there. now that getinputasarray() is public i made getinput() go through that instead of request parameters dir

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

why not? in a preview you would get a button with text "wicket:i18n:buttons.save"thats good for preview since you can see the key!-IgorOn 5/8/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It will not be previeable any more.JuergenOn 5/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> why not a f

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

This component is already there:new WebMarkupContainer("imageAlt").add(new AttributeModifier("alt", true, new Resource...):-)MartijnOn 5/9/06, Andrew Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey Guys,I think adding something to support localized attributes would be a big plus.  I know that when Wicket ad

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

It will not be previeable any more. Juergen On 5/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: why not a format like this or -Igor On 5/8/06, Andrew Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > I think adding something to support localized attributes would be a big plus. I kno

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket "pages" embedded in jsps

ok, this is what i did given the existing wicket code. i'm sure it can be done better by changing the code itself 1. change newWebRequest in QrmApplication protected WebRequest newWebRequest(final HttpServletRequest servletRequest) { if (servletRequest.getPathInfo() == null) {

Re: [Wicket-user] component input handling (was: why is MarkupContainer.add final?)

i was just looking at that. i think we messed up a little bit there. now that getinputasarray() is public i made getinput() go through that instead of request parameters directly.-Igor On 5/8/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: on the off chance that not only igor is patient with this thread.

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket "pages" embedded in jsps

Sure. An example is more than welcome. Juergen On 5/9/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i've done some work to enable embedding wicket pages in jsp pages. this is required by us, since we're currently using struts, and can't move all our code to wicket. i think it is important to enab

[Wicket-user] wicket "pages" embedded in jsps

i've done some work to enable embedding wicket pages in jsp pages. this is required by us, since we're currently using struts, and can't move all our code to wicket. i think it is important to enable existing projects to start using wicket. the main problems in that HttpServletRequest.getPath(

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

Igor Vaynberg wrote: it is now :) just added a public non final getInputAsArray() then you can implement getInput() similar to getInputAsArray()[0] (checking for nulls) figured if we have a public non final getInput() the array version should be also. -Igor On 5/8/06, *Ittay Dror*

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

it is now :)just added a public non final getInputAsArray()figured if we have a public non final getInput() the array version should be also.-IgorOn 5/8/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ittay Dror wrote:>>> Ittay Dror wrote:>> Igor Vaynberg wrote:>>> and how do i validate the resu

[Wicket-user] component input handling (was: why is MarkupContainer.add final?)

on the off chance that not only igor is patient with this thread i noticed that there is an inconsistency (in my view) in how input is handled: there's Component.getInput() then FormComponent.inputAsStringArray() which is used to set convertedInput - by convert() and rawInput - by inputChan

[Wicket-user] How to overrite Application.properties properly?

I have changed the TypeValidator message, in several ways:foo/pkg/    MyWebApplication.properties    MyWebApplication.java    Application.propertiesfoo/pkg/pages    FooPage.properties    FooPage.html     FooPage.javaNone of these have worked. :/-- Bruno Borges[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sun Certified Java Pro

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

Ittay Dror wrote: Ittay Dror wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote: and how do i validate the resulting value? in updateModel, if i find the combined value is not right, there's not much i can do. you mean the sum of correct pieces is not always correct itself?!? you can create a validator

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

Ittay Dror wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote: and how do i validate the resulting value? in updateModel, if i find the combined value is not right, there's not much i can do. you mean the sum of correct pieces is not always correct itself?!? you can create a validator that performs the sa

Re: [Wicket-user] why create new page instances ?

here is a simple examplethe user is on the BookDetails page. the book details has a tabbed view that lets user tab through general/about author/reviews/comments tabs.the user logs in and views details about book 2 - so you get the singleton page, set book id to 2, and show it to the user the user c

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

why not a format like thisor -Igor On 5/8/06, Andrew Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey Guys,I think adding something to support localized attributes would be a big plus.  I know that when Wicket added wicket:message it really saved a lot of extra Java code on my part.  I think the same thing wo

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Hey Guys,I think adding something to support localized attributes would be a big plus.  I know that when Wicket added wicket:message it really saved a lot of extra Java code on my part.  I think the same thing would happen if we came up with something to do it in attributes.  AttributeModifiers obv

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

Igor Vaynberg wrote: and how do i validate the resulting value? in updateModel, if i find the combined value is not right, there's not much i can do. you mean the sum of correct pieces is not always correct itself?!? you can create a validator that performs the same aggregation and

Re: [Wicket-user] why create new page instances ?

On Sun, 07 May 2006 10:38:53 +0430, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i return to first post : 2- if a user view/edit 4 book in its session , for him/her created 4 BookDetails and 4 EditBook page object.(why this needed) i can not understand "why this needed ?" in mailing list

[Wicket-user] MaskConverter: isn't a better way?

This is the only way I know (better: I learned from Wiki/Docs/Examples) on how to use MaskConverter:TextField zipCode = new TextField("zipCode") { public IConverter getConverter() {MaskFormatter zipFormat = null;try {zipFormat = new MaskFormatter("#-###"); // Brazillian format } catch(Exception

Re: [Wicket-user] SignIn.html

thank you, fixed.-IgorOn 5/8/06, middledot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the SignI.html file in wicket-examples-1.2-rc3 contains a small typo:Password:which of course shoud bePassword: --View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SignIn.html-t1581459.html#a4292267Sent from the Wicket - User f

[Wicket-user] SignIn.html

the SignI.html file in wicket-examples-1.2-rc3 contains a small typo: Password: which of course shoud be Password: -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SignIn.html-t1581459.html#a4292267 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. ---

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

just checked it into corethe param looks like this wicket:antiCache=random-IgorOn 5/8/06, Bruno Borges < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:This could go to Wicket Core. But before this happens, one note: The 'rand' parameter should be renamed to something like .wicket_rand. 'rand' is too simple... :)Regards

Re: [Wicket-user] Image Resource

see here:http://www.nabble.com/changing-images-with-Ajax-t1570490.htmli have also just checked in NonCachingImage, so if you are using trunk you can use it. -IgorOn 5/8/06, Samyem Tuladhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am having problem generating dynamic images in Wicket. Wicket seem to generate th

[Wicket-user] Image Resource

I am having problem generating dynamic images in Wicket. Wicket seem to generate the same URL even when the Image's resource has changed. So the browser decides to use the cached image instead of the uptodate one. How do we tell wicket to generate a different img tag's src value when the image reso

RE: [Wicket-user] page map with hot deploy

I get the same exception. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.NullPointerException at wicket.PageMap.visitEntries(Lwicket.PageMap$IVisitor;)V(PageMap.java:574) at wicket.PageMap.clear()V(PageMap.java:193) at wicket.PageMap.remove()V(PageMap.java:308) at wicket.Ses

Re: [Wicket-user] page map with hot deploy

that is strangeare you saying that those pagemaps get deployed when a request is happening?Because all pagemaps gets the session set when the request comes in. (see RequestCycle.prepare() and Session.init()) On 5/9/06, Lusebrink, Scott E CTR DISA GIG-CS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: doing ho

[Wicket-user] page map with hot deploy

Title: page map with hot deploy doing hot deploys on wicket 1.2 projects gives null pointers in pagemap.java.   a page will work fine then after a hot deploy going back to the page caused a null pointer on session.getAttributeNames(); I'm not sure what is causing the session to be null but a

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

This could go to Wicket Core. But before this happens, one note:The 'rand' parameter should be renamed to something like .wicket_rand. 'rand' is too simple... :)Regardsm On 5/8/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Fine with me. If something thinks of a nice API.EelcoOn 5/8/06, Martijn Das

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

Fine with me. If something thinks of a nice API. Eelco On 5/8/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This seems common enough, shouldn't we add this to core (of course, only when it works :-))? Martijn On 5/8/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > try this: > > Image ima

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

Ok, thanks all for the help on this problem for me.My Image subclass that I created based on the code of Igor looks like this:class NonCachableImage extends Image{    public NonCachableImage(String id, IModel model)     {        super(id, model);    }        protected void onComponentTag(final Com

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

and how do i validate the resulting value? in updateModel, if i find the combined value is not right, there's not much i can do. you mean the sum of correct pieces is not always correct itself?!? you can create a validator that performs the same aggregation and checks that i suppose. also, there's

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

and how do i validate the resulting value? in updateModel, if i find the combined value is not right, there's not much i can do. also, there's a convert() method in Component, what if i want it to be employed also? ittay Igor Vaynberg wrote: On 5/8/06, *Ittay Dror* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

On 5/8/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote:> but you can make it generic pretty easily:>> class AggreatingAtomicFormComponent extends FormComponent {>>> updateModel() {>   visitChildren(new FormComponent.IVisitor() { ... updatemodel(); });the sub components will try to us

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

This seems common enough, shouldn't we add this to core (of course, only when it works :-))?MartijnOn 5/8/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:try this:Image image = new Image("image", resource) {    protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag) {   super.onComponentTag(tag)

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

try this:Image image = new Image("image", resource) {   protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag) {   super.onComponentTag(tag); String src=""   src="">  tag.set("src", src);}; if it works you can encapsulate it into a NonCachingImage or something-IgorOn

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

yep, exactly what i'm trying to do. the datepicker and timepicker should not use the form's model (which won't neccessaraly accept them, in my case, i use CompoundPropertyModel, and it doesn't have the corresponding methods). so, i need to set in them a Model instance. i can do that in onModelC

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

How are you adding those parameters the the image URL?In html I have an image tag like this:and in code:Resource resource = Image image = new Image("image", resource); I also tried:Image image = new Image("image", new Model("/images/sunshine.png"));But than it tries to find the images in the pa

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

Igor Vaynberg wrote: and this is also what martijn showed you. notice that in his example both components are sharing the same model instance and thus share the same Date object. the problem here is that the datepicker is not aware of the time portion of the date so it probably always overw

Re: [Wicket-user] mound("/", ...) throws Exception, why?

can you remove that if statement and see if it works?-IgorOn 5/8/06, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:And is exactly that. it throws an exception saying that the path can't be "/". I saw the source and there's an If statement checking for this. :)On 5/8/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Wicket-user] mound("/", ...) throws Exception, why?

And is exactly that. it throws an exception saying that the path can't be "/". I saw the source and there's an If statement checking for this. :)On 5/8/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: if you are talking about mounting a package on / then you should be able to do that with something li

Re: [Wicket-user] mound("/", ...) throws Exception, why?

if you are talking about mounting a package on / then you should be able to do that with something like mount("/", PackageName.for(Index.class));then if you have an Index.class page in that package it should be accessible from /site/Index at least i remember i wrote this functionality in because it

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

i'm not sure we're on the same page here. martijn showed me how to use the DatePicker, which i already have (and love it btw) what i need is this: given a Date field somewhere in my model, have two text fields. one showing the date part, one the time: so if my Date object represents '06/02/2006

Re: [Wicket-user] mound("/", ...) throws Exception, why?

Yeah, it's /site/*, I just cutted off the unnecessary info. Sorry... :DSo, how about something like:mountByClassName(String underPath, PackageName pkg);this would be the same as loop through all classes located under the pkg and create a mounted path with the same name as the class.I know this can

Re: [Wicket-user] mound("/", ...) throws Exception, why?

you cannot mount onto / because that is reserved for the homepage, so in a way homepage is always mounted on /if you want to mount something onto /site/index then you need to mount on /index not /mount("/index", Index.class);btw, your url mapping should be /site/* not just /site-IgorOn 5/8/06, Bru

[Wicket-user] mound("/", ...) throws Exception, why?

Why can't I mount my pages so they all can be bookmarkable from "/" ?Just a note: the WicketServlet is under url-pattern = /site, so my pages would be bookmarkable like "/site/Index".Regards, -- Bruno Borges[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sun Certified Java Programmer for 1.4Sun Certified Web Component Developer

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

in that case i think you should do what martijn said because that is proper encapsulation. how else can you reuse that combination elsewhere?IModel model=new Model(new Date());WebMarkupContainer composite=new WebMarkupContainer("composite", model)); composite.add(new TextFIeld("date", model));compo

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

Igor Vaynberg wrote: why not this? WebMarkupContainer composite=new WebMarkupContainer("id", new CompoundPropertyModel(new ValueMap())); composite.add(new TextField("date")); composite.add(new TextField("time")); this does what you want right? composite's model is a map whose date key cont

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

That's not the kind of context I meant. I was thinking there could be anadditional context parameter - maybe RequestCycle. Don't know if that is possible or necessary. It was just an idea.RequestCycle is a threadlocal and is available from anywhere via RequestCycle.get() given that code executes in

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

why not this?WebMarkupContainer composite=new WebMarkupContainer("id", new CompoundPropertyModel(new ValueMap()));composite.add(new TextField("date"));composite.add(new TextField("time")); this does what you want right?composite's model is a map whose date key contains the value of the date textfie

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

yes but why would you have that?Why not if you have the page call:page.getExpression()Then it is compile time save it refactores nicelyIn my eyes the the PropertyModel is just handy and there is no otherway to do it then by using strings. It is a pitty that we can give method or field pointers like

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment rendering

I made some test to see if Aaron request for a markup file with fragments only can be supported. There doesn't seem to be a simple solution. A page referencing fragments defined in a Panel which is also added to the Page defnitely doesn't work. We'd need a more fle

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 ?

if you quit checking your email every five seconds maybe you will get it done sooner! :)-IgorOn 5/8/06, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Working on it at this actual moment :) Writing, writing, writing. EelcoOn 5/8/06, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 5/8/06, Eelco Hillenius

[Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

Johan Compagner wrote: then we get partial scripting inside java/page. Didn't know that was a bad thing... Why would we have that. What would you call with performAction? We can already do this: PropertyResolver.getValue("expression", this.getPage()); I'd like to just be able to type: t

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

then we get partial scripting inside java/page.Why would we have that. What would you call with performAction?On 5/8/06, Anders Peterson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I assume you mean PropertyResolver.getValue(String _expression_, Objectobject);That's not the kind of context I meant. I was thinking

[Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

I assume you mean PropertyResolver.getValue(String expression, Object object); That's not the kind of context I meant. I was thinking there could be an additional context parameter - maybe RequestCycle. Don't know if that is possible or necessary. It was just an idea. I would specifically li

[Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

What I'm asking for is not to be able to use ognl (or similar) on top of wicket, but to have something equivalent inside it. An interface PropertyCoding (NSKeyValueCoding) that is then implemented by *all* wicket classes. /Anders Eelco Hillenius wrote: You can still use OGNL, just not by de

Re: [Wicket-user] Creating form-fields for a Set

Provided I understand the issue you want to: Dynamically create a TextField for each entry in the Set. The current value of the iterator shall be the default? The TextFied don't have Labels? No validators are required for numbers, phone number, email address, etc.? => use ListView or any of the

Re: [Wicket-user] a small issue with contrib VelocityPanel

Please find both FreemarkerPanel and VelocityPanel attachedOn 5/8/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Could you please provide a patch? You already have it on your computer right? I'll apply it right away.Thanks,EelcoOn 5/8/06, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I'm not sure if the

[Wicket-user] Creating form-fields for a Set

Hey everybody,   Thanks for the help on the last problem. I’m implementing it as we speak and I’m finally starting to dig the core Wicket concepts now!! (and loving it)   The next problem that I need to fix to proudly show off my wicket prototype is editing a Set of Strings in a form.

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment rendering

I did a little experiment. The code down below is all you need to implement your requirement of finding the fragments markup snippet on a markup stream directly associated with the class. /** * A special Fragment (WebMarkupContainer) which searches for the fragment * i

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

* We might consider adding event methods, like onAdd(Component) andonReplace(Component) that are called right after a component is added/ replaced. A special not on this is that the add method will dissapearanyway the next major release as we have the constructor change then.Replace will still exis

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

You can still use OGNL, just not by default for the PropertyModels etc. We removed OGNL as it had seriously bad performance - it showed up as the last hotspot we had when profiling Wicket -, and it doesn't seem to be maintained actively anymore (in fact, I had to wait for a bug fix for almost a ye

Re: [Wicket-user] why the use of tags

Eelco Hillenius wrote: > Tags with wicket:id attributes are coupled to Wicket components, while > are more like processing instructions. I/ we feel like > this is a big distinction and should be communicated as such. what about my other message about a CompositeComponent. how is it so different

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

You also have this now.Just call PropertyResolver.getValue(contextObject, propertyString)where should that performAction method be located?On 5/8/06, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A different web application framework that I've worked with has "ognl"available everywhere. It's extremel

[Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

Anders Peterson wrote: I'm sure it needs to return anything, but maybe it could be passed some sort of context object (if available). Should be: I'm NOT sure it needs to return anything, but maybe it could be passed some sort of context object (if available). --

[Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

Well... public void performActionNamed(String anExpression) { PropertyResolver.getValue(anExpression, this); } I'm sure it needs to return anything, but maybe it could be passed some sort of context object (if available). /Anders Johan Compagner wrote: Yes it is the wicket.util.lang

[Wicket-user] Re: Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

A different web application framework that I've worked with has "ognl" available everywhere. It's extremely convenient and powerful! http://developer.apple.com/documentation/WebObjects/Reference/API5.2.4/com/webobjects/foundation/NSKeyValueCoding.html Seems to me it wouldn't be difficult to add

Re: [Wicket-user] Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

Yes it is the wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolver classWhat would that perform do?How does it look like?PropertyResolver has limited support for executing methods.something like:Object value = PropertyResolver.getValue ("getAddressArray()", person);is supported.johanOn 5/8/06, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL

[Wicket-user] Where is the OGNL replacement code in wicket 1.2?

I'm looking for the equivalent of Ognl.setValue(...) and guessing I should use wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolver.setvalue(...); The wicket.util.object package (referred to in the wiki migrate instructions) does not exist. Would it be possible to add a method performActionNamed(String express

Re: [Wicket-user] why the use of tags

Eelco Hillenius wrote: Tags with wicket:id attributes are coupled to Wicket components, while are more like processing instructions. I/ we feel like this is a big distinction and should be communicated as such. what about my other message about a CompositeComponent. how is it so different fr

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

Eelco Hillenius wrote: a method like add is deliberately protected by final to ensure it will work like it is supposed to, no matter what component hierarchy you're in. So, before opening up such a method, we would like to be absolutely sure there are no alternatives for it. In your case there

Re: [Wicket-user] dynamic html controls

I've added http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Using_repeaters, although I'm not sure if there's not an optimisation I'm missing involving a compound property model, as I've got a populateItem() like this... protected void populateItem(ListItem item) { Use

Re: [Wicket-user] a small issue with contrib VelocityPanel

Could you please provide a patch? You already have it on your computer right? I'll apply it right away. Thanks, Eelco On 5/8/06, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not sure if there is any interest in wicket.contrib.markup.html.velocity.VelocityPanel. But just for the sake of complet

Re: [Wicket-user] menu tree

It's one of these components we'd still like to have in our distribution. Didn't happen so far yet though. There's a contribution here http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1416392&group_id=119783&atid=684977 (with a patch) you might find useful. There were a couple of things I

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 ?

Working on it at this actual moment :) Writing, writing, writing. Eelco On 5/8/06, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/8/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For those people that have reacted, I want to let you know that I gave > the complete list to Manning. They didn

Re: [Wicket-user] why the use of tags

Tags with wicket:id attributes are coupled to Wicket components, while are more like processing instructions. I/ we feel like this is a big distinction and should be communicated as such. Eelco On 5/8/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: why are all these tags? why not or similar? th

[Wicket-user] Re: [Wicket-announce] GOSS iAM - a commercial application of Wicket

Cool, thanks for sharing that. If you're interested, it would be very much appreciated to write a few lines about this at our WIKI: http://wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Stories And anyone else reading this (including the guys from Servoy and Topicus), it'd be nice to share a few lines there t

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 ?

On 5/8/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For those people that have reacted, I want to let you know that I gavethe complete list to Manning. They didn't want to include everyone on*sniff* ah well - roll on the publication :)

Re: [Wicket-user] proposal: internationalization project

Thanks for your reactions concerning starting up an internationalization project guys. If I ever have a spare moment in the next few weeks, I'll try to start it up. Might take a while though, so I hope you're not in a hurry :) Eelco --- Using

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 ?

For those people that have reacted, I want to let you know that I gave the complete list to Manning. They didn't want to include everyone on the list though, as that would take way to much time to handle. I didn't have much direct influence on who is picked and who is not, so for those that didn't

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment rendering

i have used it quiet a bit and it seems to work fine. so i would be +1 for making it enabled by default. I can confirm that :) +1 for enabling by default. Eelco --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Ge

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

a method like add is deliberately protected by final to ensure it will work like it is supposed to, no matter what component hierarchy you're in. So, before opening up such a method, we would like to be absolutely sure there are no alternatives for it. In your case there are a couple of things to

[Wicket-user] menu tree

Hi all, I want to develope menu tree via javascript calls in wicket How it is create plz give me some information regarding this Thanks in Advance Gangadhar --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment rendering

Yeah, but a good framework should not get in the way of what you are trying to do, right? I spent 2-3 hours trying to figure out a way to do this with fragments :) Others will probably hit the same wall someday. Panels did work for my solution, but in this situation loading fragments as a "stan

Re: [Wicket-user] TinyMCE

it was fixed two days back, now everything should be fine. i updated to tinymce 2.0.6.1 version as well and applied Frank's patch. please do and update and let me know if it works for you. iulianOn 5/8/06, Alexander Lohse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Pattern seems to be wrong/not working.After q

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

that is not my problem. my problem is that i have two components (text fields) - one for date, one for time, whose combined value is my model value. i can, of course, create a custom model, and onSubmit get its values, combine them, and put in the form's model. but this is awkward, and not co

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

i want to set the model of the child. i thought of doing that by: child.setModel(myModel); super.add(child); what is wrong with that? how else can i do it? here's the long story of what i'm trying to acheive: i have a web page with two text fields, for date and time (for the date,

Re: [Wicket-user] TinyMCE

Don't know wy you have to specify them once for a extentions.About that recursive thing:We do this:    if (recurse)                {                    addResources(scope, pattern, resources, new StringBuffer(relativePath                             .toString()).append(file.getName()).a

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

Ittay,It seems like you need to create a Panel instead So a much cleaner design, and more reusable component would be:public class MyDatePicker extends Panel {    public MyDatePicker(String id, IModel model) {     super(id);    add(new DatePicker("datepicker", model));    add(new TextFi

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment rendering

On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 00:52 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote: On 5/8/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: because it hasn't been extensively tested. As far as I'm aware you are almost the only user of it. If you think it is stable e

Re: [Wicket-user] why the use of tags

because it is much cleaner. juergen On 5/8/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: why are all these tags? why not or similar? thanks, ittay -- === Ittay Dror Chief architect, openQRM TL, R&D, Qlusters Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-3-6081994 Fax: +972-3-6081

Re: [Wicket-user] why the use of tags

Martijn Dashorst wrote: Which tags are you referring to, and why are they a problem? We have tried to minimize our specific tags, and they are nicely escaped so your browser should not complain about it. Some exist to make a clear distinction to which are components that are added to your

Re: [Wicket-user] why the use of tags

Which tags are you referring to, and why are they a problem?We have tried to minimize our specific tags, and they are nicely escaped so your browser should not complain about it.Some exist to make a clear distinction to which are components that are added to your panel, and the panel itself, or to

Re: [Wicket-user] why is MarkupContainer.add final?

You want to do what? add() is used to add Wicket Components to the component hierarchy. It is NOT used to set or add a model. Child components can be access by get(childId). Juergen On 5/8/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I want to create a MarkupContainer component which sets the mode

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment rendering

On 5/8/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: because it hasn't been extensively tested. As far as I'm aware you arealmost the only user of it. If you think it is stable enough anddoesn't interfere with any other features and/or functionalities thanit can be enabled by default. i have us

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment rendering

because it hasn't been extensively tested. As far as I'm aware you are almost the only user of it. If you think it is stable enough and doesn't interfere with any other features and/or functionalities than it can be enabled by default. I made some test to see if Aaron request for a markup file wi

  1   2   >