Hi there.
I am struggling with using getSession().invalidate() when logging out a
user.
I have a reduced my test case to a simple logout page:
public class LogoutPage extends WebPage {
@Override
protected void onEndRequest() {
getSession().invalidate();
}
Hi Johan.
I override newWebRequest in my WebApplication class as follows and works
fine.
protected WebRequest newWebRequest(HttpServletRequest request) {
String path = request.getRequestURL().toString();
getApplicationSettings().setContextPath(path);
return super.newWebRe
Btw, it turns out it *was* a bug in Jetty 6. It recently got fixed
(svn only now). Anyway, Wicket should now work regardless of that bug
or not.
Eelco
On 7/3/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just checked in the fix for the problem I found with Jetty 6 (and
> which might be an i
* Johan Compagner:
> so the older one doesn't need to be applied?
No, it doesn't.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make
so the older one doesn't need to be applied?On 7/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Johan Compagner:> is this path an append on the previous one or one by itself?
It's a brand new patch against 1.2-rc1. I just tested, it appliesOK on 1.2 release.-- Jean-Baptiste Quenotaka
That all works only for validation - it doesn't prevent components'
models from being updated, and it is quite a lot of work. An easier
and better way is to override isEnabled (or isVisible, but isEnabled
seems better here) and return false if they shouldn't be validated and
updated. The only catch
the difference between wicket and echo2 is that echo2 is only ajax, wicket supports regular requests as the primary mode. so, ajax in wicket will never probably be as easy as it is in echo2. if you are looking for a totally ajax based application you are probably better off sticking with echo2 or o
* Johan Compagner:
> is this path an append on the previous one or one by itself?
It's a brand new patch against 1.2-rc1. I just tested, it applies
OK on 1.2 release.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support
that should work fineBut you can only do that when a request is comming in not in construction time of the webapp.johanOn 7/3/06, R.A <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Johan.I remove base tag and set "getApplicationSettings().setContextPath(path)" inmy webapplication class's init method, work fine.Tha
First of all, thank you for your feedback, appreciate it very much!
I am new to Wicket. Before starting with Wicket I had some experience with
Echo2, where I do not have to worry about how to make a component being
ajaxified. This is why I am a little bit frustrated about this in Wicket..
Hope the
Why not something like:
class MyCustomValidator extends AbstractFormValidator {
private List validators;
private CheckBox checkbox;
private FormComponent formComponent;
public MyCustomValidator(cb, fc, StringValidator... vs) {
this.checkbox = cb;
this.formComponent
This is because the 'ajax' ID (the id Wicket uses in rendering) has to
be known before it knows the markup tag. This is a limitation of 1.2
that we have solved in 2.0 with the constructor change.
Simply put: in order to generate a unique identifier, a component
needs its parent. During constructio
The problem with FormValidator is that the individual components
(checkbox + textfields) are still validated with validators
(FormComponent.validateValidators()). My client wants the form to work
so that if the checkbox is not checked, the textfields can contain
invalid data.
One way to implement
Indeed, it seems that the old value is overriden with the generated value...
In this case, why the markupId do not care about the old value? Wouldn't it
be much better if it would be the same as the original id?
Alex Objelean wrote:
>
> In this case, the designer efforts will be disabled anytim
In this case, the designer efforts will be disabled anytime I use an
ajaxified component, isn't it?
For instance I have :
in CSS:
div#idForDesigner {
float: left;
border: solid red 1px;
}
in JAVA:
Component component = new MyComponent("idForWicket");
component.setOutputMarkupId(true);
You can add form level validation, creating composite validators, and
add both the checkbox and the field, and the validators for the field
to your composite validator.
See EqualInputValidator for an example implementation.
Martijn
On 7/3/06, Joni Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a cu
it will add "id='dlfjldfj'" to each component, which adds to the
amount of data sent,
it can overwrite existing 'id' attributes, disabling efforts done by
your designer,
ajax is hot, but not everyone wants to use it, so enabling it by
default is not something we as a framework supplier want to push
Why I should always call setOutputMarkupId(true) when I want to ajaxify the
component, couldn't it by default be true?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-OutputMarkupId-tf1883868.html#a5149915
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.
Using Tomcat but
I have a curious requirement for a form. When a user submits a form,
some of the FormComponents should not be processed at all (for example,
validation should not be done). Each FormComponent has an accompanying
checkbox control which determines whether the actual control is
activated or not.
[ ]
Hi Johan.
I remove base tag and set "getApplicationSettings().setContextPath(path)" in
my webapplication class's init method, work fine.
Thank you!
But...I don't know how do I "path" dynamically, so I set direct path, String
path = "http://localhost:9080/myapp/pc";, this time.
How do I get HttpSe
yes we are prepending the context and servlet paths to your html files so that they map ok.See the PrependContextPathHandler So if everything works out you shouldn't need to set the basetag, because we are preparsing the source for you.
johanOn 7/3/06, R.A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Frank.I succ
Hi Frank.
I succeeded at setting base tag, thank you!
But images is unshown.
I write img src="image/abc.jpg" in html file, but as looking at source file
on browser, img src="myapp/image/abc.jpg".
It seems like to be added "myapp" to img tag by Wicket.
"myapp" is context root.
I set "http://localh
I just checked in the fix for the problem I found with Jetty 6 (and
which might be an issue in other containers). From the change log:
'Implemented a workaround for an inconsistency between different
servlet containers and a bug in the servlet spec which does not seem
to state what should happen w
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 00:46 -0700, R.A wrote:
> How do I set this "path" in base tag?
In html:
In java:
WebComponent baseTag = new WebComponent("baseTag");
baseTag.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier("href", path));
add(baseTag);
Frank
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web serv
I have the same problem with 1.2 final
Matej Knopp a écrit :
Current released version is 1.2 final, can you check if it works with
that version?
-Matej
Alban Duval wrote:
Hi all.
I have two problems with Form in wicket 1,2-rc4 (it worked wit rc3 :-/ )
* The first is R
What servlet container are you testing with? I'm right now making a
workingaround for a bug in Jetty 6 (or rather the specification), that
results in the required check failing.
Eelco
On 7/3/06, Alban Duval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I have two problems with Form in wicket 1,2-
Hi.
Let me ask another question.
I'd like to change absolute path in base tag dynamically.
I get absolute path in page class as follows.
HttpServletRequest request = ((WebRequest)
getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest();
String path = request.getRequestURL().toString();
How do I set this "path" i
Current released version is 1.2 final, can you check if it works with
that version?
-Matej
Alban Duval wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have two problems with Form in wicket 1,2-rc4 (it worked wit rc3 :-/ )
>
> * The first is RequiredTextField that is not required when
> executing. The user ca
Hi all.
I have two problems with Form in wicket 1,2-rc4 (it worked wit rc3 :-/ )
The first is RequiredTextField that is not required when
executing. The user can go to the next page without filling the text
field.
The RequiredTextField is added in a form like this :
public
29 matches
Mail list logo
