I'll be checking in an URIRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy in the
next days that basically takes the remaining URL fragment and
gives it to the user as getURI(). To follow your advice,
I will also add an example of how to combine this with a
Someone should really make an example or even a reusable class
like that. What you're suggesting is very non-obvious to a newbie.
Jean-Baptiste Quenot-3 wrote:
* ZedroS Schwart:
Regarding static content, is it such a big issue to have some
wicket html pages with empty classes behind
* Jonathan Locke:
Someone should really make an example or even a reusable class
like that. What you're suggesting is very non-obvious to a
newbie.
I'll be checking in an URIRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy in the
next days that basically takes the remaining URL fragment and
Regarding static content, is it such a big issue to have some wicket
html pages with empty classes behind ?
Thanks in advance
ZedroS
On 3/15/07, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is definitely possible. First make sure you are running 1.2.5 or
better (this will fix a bug where posts did not
It is definitely possible. First make sure you are running 1.2.5 or
better (this will fix a bug where posts did not have a '/' after the
context name if you choose to deploy the application with a non root
context). Map your servlet to '/*' ... Next, deploy. =)
The only other issue to worry about
Hi all
On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is ok to do that (use /* mapping) if you use WicketFilter instead of
WicketServlet
I'm sorry but I didn't a WicketFilter class in the API nor in the
wicket examples. And the web.xml file from wicket examples seems
rather normal to me
Hello,
the Filter is not in Wicket 1.2.x, only 1.3 and 2.0.
ZedroS Schwart schrieb:
Hi all
On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is ok to do that (use /* mapping) if you use WicketFilter instead of
WicketServlet
I'm sorry but I didn't a WicketFilter class in the API nor
Danke schön Rüdiger !
I understand better now.
Have a good day
++
ZedroS
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT
On 3/12/07, Brian Topping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here I thought they were cool, then they use Ant?!?
Yes, with Ivy. Maybe not cool, but works very well :-)
- Xavier
:b
On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:45 AM, mraible wrote:
Thought y'all might be interested:
http://opensource.joost.com/
Thought y'all might be interested:
http://opensource.joost.com/
Joost is a new company started by the founders of Skype:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joost
Matt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Joost-uses-Wicket-tf3390296.html#a9437082
Sent from the Wicket - User
Here I thought they were cool, then they use Ant?!?
:b
On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:45 AM, mraible wrote:
Thought y'all might be interested:
http://opensource.joost.com/
Joost is a new company started by the founders of Skype:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joost
Matt
--
View this message
If they use Wicket why doesn't it show at all on their website at
joost.com? I am expecting to at least see some evidence of a servlet
context path...
Gili
Brian Topping wrote:
Here I thought they were cool, then they use Ant?!?
:b
On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:45 AM, mraible wrote:
is it at all feasible that it is being used for an internal system?
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they use Wicket why doesn't it show at all on their website at
joost.com? I am expecting to at least see some evidence of a servlet
context path...
Gili
Brian
In any public application I deploy I remove the servlet context path
(wicket or no wicket).
Ryan
On 3/12/07, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they use Wicket why doesn't it show at all on their website at
joost.com? I am expecting to at least see some evidence of a servlet
context
My point is that you can't do that with Wicket, unless you know
something I don't...?
Gili
Ryan wrote:
In any public application I deploy I remove the servlet context path
(wicket or no wicket).
Ryan
On 3/12/07, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they use Wicket why
Gili,
I think I did this on http://www.autoscraper.com...
Brian
On Mar 12, 2007, at 5:30 PM, cowwoc wrote:
My point is that you can't do that with Wicket, unless you know
something I don't...?
Gili
Ryan wrote:
In any public application I deploy I remove the servlet context path
Hi Brian,
Yes you can probably do that for a Wicket site with no external
references (i.e. static files hosted outside the scope of the servlet
such as images) but last time I checked the Wicket developers were
recommending against such a configuration.
Gili
Brian Topping wrote:
Gili,
it is ok to do that (use /* mapping) if you use WicketFilter instead of
WicketServlet
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brian,
Yes you can probably do that for a Wicket site with no external
references (i.e. static files hosted outside the scope of the servlet
That's news to me :) Thanks!
I tried reading more about it on the Wiki but I couldn't find an
example that maps the root. The example in
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html maps the application to
/app. Do you have another example or documentation somewhere?
Gili
look how wicket-examples are setup
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's news to me :) Thanks!
I tried reading more about it on the Wiki but I couldn't find an
example that maps the root. The example in
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html maps
i think that's correct. but i also heard that it will be publicly visible
later.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
is it at all feasible that it is being used for an internal system?
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they use Wicket why doesn't it show at all on
i was being sarcastic :)
-igor
On 3/12/07, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think that's correct. but i also heard that it will be publicly visible
later.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
is it at all feasible that it is being used for an internal system?
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc
I thought everybody knew this, Jonathan I guess once mentioned it on his
weblog. And there's also another big one here
http://martijndashorst.com/blog/2007/03/10/myspace-going-wicket/
On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was being sarcastic :)
-igor
On 3/12/07, Jonathan Locke
23 matches
Mail list logo
