That's interesting. Do you include Wicket pages in you sitemesh definitions too?
Eelco
On 4/1/06, Nili Adoram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reconsidering I used Sitemesh which provides a better approach to
this issue.
However, this is a good opportunity to thank you Wicket team for
Thanks for voting. Don't forget to use it too! ;)
Eelco
On 4/1/06, Nili Adoram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reconsidering I used Sitemesh which provides a better approach to
this issue.
However, this is a good opportunity to thank you Wicket team for
developing the most wonderful
Our application is composed of wicket page and struts page (we wanted to
avoid rewriting our huge application so we decided that only new pages
are implemented as wicket pages).
In order to achieve a unique layout for all pages no matter if wicket or
struts I used sitemesh servlet filter with
After reconsidering I used Sitemesh which provides a better approach to
this issue.
However, this is a good opportunity to thank you Wicket team for
developing the most wonderful framework.
I voted for you!
Nili
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
To my knowledge, none of the core developers of Wicket
To my knowledge, none of the core developers of Wicket uses the
Include component for their projects. What about this: if you and
anyone else that uses this functionality agree on what would be the
best implementation, I'd be happy to look at the patch and put it in
Wicket if we agree on it. That
I posted a very similar component to the group a while back -- search
for Servlet forward to a JSP. It could be used as a starting point
for a nice component, as it definitely needs polishing.
On 2006-03-29 23:54:57 -0700, Nili Adoram [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
How about extending Include as
