Re: [Wicket-user] TinyMCE integration

2006-09-25 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Just for those that want to sell the whole package. And only if you change the javascript file iirc. If you make it a plugin, and keep that a separate download, it can have lgpl, gpl or any other license, provided that you may distribute the incompatible file(s). Martijn On 9/22/06, Eelco Hillen

Re: [Wicket-user] TinyMCE integration

2006-09-25 Thread Ted Roeloffzen
Ok, thanksOn 9/22/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IANAL, but this is really only a problem in the sense that we'll notmoving the component to Apache. But the wicket-stuff project is meantto stay at sourceforge anyway.I don't think it's a problem for end-users. EelcoOn 9/22/06, Ted Ro

Re: [Wicket-user] TinyMCE integration

2006-09-22 Thread Eelco Hillenius
IANAL, but this is really only a problem in the sense that we'll not moving the component to Apache. But the wicket-stuff project is meant to stay at sourceforge anyway. I don't think it's a problem for end-users. Eelco On 9/22/06, Ted Roeloffzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok that is good news

Re: [Wicket-user] TinyMCE integration

2006-09-22 Thread Ted Roeloffzen
Ok that is good news, but we still have the problem that the licenses of TinyMCE and Wicket might be incompatible.On 9/22/06, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Checked it now, and the current release of tinymce does not work well. However, this issuehttp://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php

Re: [Wicket-user] TinyMCE integration

2006-09-21 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Checked it now, and the current release of tinymce does not work well. However, this issue http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1440124&group_id=103281&atid=635682 suggests the problem I'm experiencing will be gone with the next release. Eelco On 9/21/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMA

Re: [Wicket-user] TinyMCE integration

2006-09-21 Thread Eelco Hillenius
I also have an open bug report for the system that I'm working on that tinymce doesn't work well with the latest Safari. I haven't checked that yet though... maybe other people have experience with that? Eelco On 9/21/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just one caveat: tinymce is

Re: [Wicket-user] TinyMCE integration

2006-09-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Just one caveat: tinymce is LGPL last time I checked... not sure how this works out, but you can't guarantee that the CMS is then Apache licensed (if that is what you're aiming for). Martijn On 9/21/06, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Ted Roeloffzen wr

Re: [Wicket-user] TinyMCE integration

2006-09-21 Thread Janne Hietamäki
On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Ted Roeloffzen wrote: > Some of you may know that we are trying to create a CMS or a least > CMS-components with Wicket. When i looked at the Wicket-stuff site > a saw that there is a project to integrate TinyMCE into Wicket. I > was wondering if anyone knows h

[Wicket-user] TinyMCE integration

2006-09-21 Thread Ted Roeloffzen
Some of you may know that we are trying to create a CMS or a least CMS-components with Wicket. When i looked at the Wicket-stuff site a saw that there is a project to integrate TinyMCE into Wicket. I was wondering if anyone knows how far along this project is. It could be a fine addition to the CMS