Thanks, Igor. You rock!
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i will try to get it setup today.
-igor
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm with Fillipo. We've already determined that we can't host
> wicket-stuff with wicket on apache.org. No need to m
i will try to get it setup today.
-igor
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm with Fillipo. We've already determined that we can't host wicket-stuff
with wicket on apache.org. No need to mention it again. Both Eelco and
Igor mentioned that there are some boxes wicket has
I'm with Fillipo. We've already determined that we can't host wicket-stuff
with wicket on apache.org. No need to mention it again. Both Eelco and Igor
mentioned that there are some boxes wicket has that we can use to set up
confluence. Let's do that. How do we move ahead?
On 1/11/07, Filippo Diot
On 1/11/07, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Confluence is setup here: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/
Sorry guys... I don't get it.
You've said in another thread that we cannot use apache infrastructure
for wicket-stuff.. right?
So, if I understand well, that instance of confluence yo
Confluence is setup here: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/
On 1/11/07, Filippo Diotalevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, we can't use Apache's infrastructure for wicket-stuff. However,
> we have a couple of servers available that are not r
On 1/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, we can't use Apache's infrastructure for wicket-stuff. However,
> we have a couple of servers available that are not related to Apache I
> believe.
>
> Eelco
Eelco,
are there any news with this regard?
--
Filippo Diotalevi
[EMAIL PROT
