e
> > recipient to ensure that they are virus free and no responsibility is
> > accepted by Multicom Products Limited for any loss or damage arising
> > in any
> > way from receipt or use thereof.
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message - From: "
oss or damage arising
in any
way from receipt or use thereof.
- Original Message - From: "Bennett, Timothy (JIS -
Applications)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 2:43 PM
Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Wicket + Acegi Security ?
-Original Me
tt, Timothy (JIS - Applications)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 2:43 PM
Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Wicket + Acegi Security ?
-Original Message-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 4:28 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.s
I opened an issue for it:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1250242&group_id=119783&atid=684978
Help is appreciated!
Eelco
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simp
> -Original Message-
> From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 4:28 AM
> To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket + Acegi Security ?
>
> Now, I don't want to downplay the advantages a pro
I just had a consultancy gig with a customer last week (one of the
world's largest banks) who had massive troubles with implementing
portlet technology just because of the historical dependency on URLs
(they use SiteMinder) for authentication/ authorisation.
Now, I don't want to downplay the a
Hi list,
Just wondering if anybody has successfully used the Acegi security
framework with Wicket (Phil?). I'm currently using Acegi with
SpringMVC and I'd like to use it with Spring/Wicket.
I guess the techniques from the signin examples will do for now, but
in future I need more sophist
