Thanks Scott. I'll have a look into it tonight (10 hours from now).
Juergen
On 11/24/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I don't know if my use-case is enough of a reason to clutter up the
interface of WebPage. I also don't know if there is a reason to widen
== Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
== Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could someone point me to where in the source code this happens? I
don't really know my way around Wicket internals yet, but I'd like to
see this, and it's not in WebPage, which was my first guess.
== Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
== Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFE: allow wicket:id on body tag which currently is not possible due
to wickets body onLoad handling.
Okay. It's at http://tinyurl.com/7azmc [ ... ]
I'll look to see if I can create a patch for this.
Okay, a patch
Okay, a patch is attached that modifies WebPage and BodyOnloadContainer.
It's a suggestion for something less than the wicket:id on the body
tag. It simply adds
public void addBodyAttributeModifier(AttributeModifier modifier)
to WebPage, so that you can do, for instance,
I don't know if my use-case is enough of a reason to clutter up the
interface of WebPage. I also don't know if there is a reason to widen
this facility beyond adding AttributeModifiers. But for what it's
worth, here is my simple suggestion.
Honestly, I'm not in favour of cluttering the
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I don't know if my use-case is enough of a reason to clutter up the
interface of WebPage. I also don't know if there is a reason to widen
this facility beyond adding AttributeModifiers. But for what it's
worth, here is my simple suggestion.
Honestly, I'm not in
Why does the BODY allow an unused wicket:id attribute?
I was trying to implement an enhancement to my markup-inheritance-based
pages to add a class attribute to the body tag in order to make it a
little easier to apply my CSS. I added 'wicket:id=body' to the body
tag, and started adding a
It all has to do with wicket:head and panels being able to
contribute body onLoad=xxx attributes to the page. In order to
support that feature, a webmarkupcontainer is automatically created
and associated with the body tag of the page (in case of an exception,
on the exception page you can see a
== Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
== Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the info, Juergen.
So my first question is why don't I get an exception when there is a
wicket:id attribute on the BODY tag and no corresponding Component on
the Page?
It all has to do with wicket:head
On 11/22/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
== Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the info, Juergen.
So my first question is why don't I get an exception when there is a
wicket:id attribute on the BODY tag and no corresponding
10 matches
Mail list logo
