Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Sorry, I guess except the javadoc there is no extra doc on it. What is
your question? Signin and Signin2 and not very complex.
I think this is precisely the Problem.
I found it already out by myself, but it took me some time to find and
understand that the key thing
David,
yes you're right we have to work on the docs, has been on our list and
is under construction. Did you check out our wiki and (the outdated)
user guide. it should provide at a beginner some inside into Wicket.
You mentioned you would simplifiy the API even further. You mentioned
IModel.
Hi Juergen,
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
David,
yes you're right we have to work on the docs, has been on our list and
is under construction. Did you check out our wiki and (the outdated)
user guide. it should provide at a beginner some inside into Wicket.
You mentioned you would simplifiy the
Uh ohh, i started reading the dicussion about interfaces in wicket.
I think Eleco and Jonathan might be wrong in some ways.
One /very/ important reason not to use interfaces in this case is that:
interfaces are hard to evolve. Interfaces have to be pretty darn stable
before even considering
I quite long enough. But i guess because of fact that you answer only
with one non-context question to my mail that you will not even think
about the meaning of what i said, right?
Rather than bother around with who i am and how long i have been doing
something you should just engage with
i think you're awfully, awfully full of yourself (in fact, you sound like
me about 10 years ago... ;-)). have you even considered the
possibility that it might be /you/ that doesn't get it?
from my perspective:
loose coupled interfaces == bell bottom jeans
people think that they're the
for everything, but in this case it would be nice.
Thanks,
Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Locke
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 2:29 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
i don't have a graphic equalizer that's going to compensate. i think
we're done talking.
David Liebeherr wrote:
Jonathan Locke wrote:
David Liebeherr wrote:
I quite long enough. But i guess because of fact that you answer
only with one non-context question to my mail that you will
Sorry, but is that the way you react on critism?
Cu,
Dave
Jonathan Locke wrote:
i don't have a graphic equalizer that's going to compensate. i think
we're done talking.
David Liebeherr wrote:
Jonathan Locke wrote:
David Liebeherr wrote:
I quite long enough. But i guess because of
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
i think you're awfully, awfully full of yourself (in fact,
you sound like me about 10 years ago... ;-)). have you even
considered the possibility that it might be /you/ that doesn't get it?
from my perspective:
loose coupled
Hi Juergen,
I think Wicket has a great design. Escpecially I like the use of classes
in favour of interfaces where no alternative implementations are realy
useful.
You mentioned you would simplifiy the API even further. You mentioned
IModel. Anything else that comes into your mind?
In the
yeah, this would make a good FAQ entry. we struggled with naming this
class for quite a while and i can understand your unhappiness with the
name. unfortunately, i think it's too late to change this one now.
Christian Essl wrote:
Hi Juergen,
I think Wicket has a great design.
thoughts?
Thanks,
Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Locke
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:41 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
Jonathan
PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
Jonathan,
Could you please elaborate on why interfaces are fragile.
It doesn't
click for me. How is it more fragile to have an interface
and a single
.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Igor Vaynberg
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:04 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
I can see your point. My thinking has always been that any
Of
Jonathan Locke
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:41 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
Jonathan,
Could you please elaborate on why interfaces are fragile.
It doesn't
click for me. How is it more fragile
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
I can see your point. My thinking has always been that any abstract
class has an implicit interface which is the sum of its public
methods, and that there really is no difference between evolving
public methods in an abstract class
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Locke
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 6:12 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
btw, why doesn't PageableListViewNavigationLink just use its own page?
the navigation and the navigated object should never
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Igor
Vaynberg
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:04 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
I can see your point. My thinking has always been that
any abstract
class has an implicit interface which is the sum
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jonathan
Locke
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:41 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
Jonathan,
Could you please elaborate
, August 02, 2005 5:04 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
I can see your point. My thinking has always been that
any abstract
class has an implicit interface which is the sum of its public
methods, and that there really is no difference
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Igor
Vaynberg
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:04 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Sigin Example
I can see your point. My thinking has always been
Sorry, I guess except the javadoc there is no extra doc on it. What is
your question? Signin and Signin2 and not very complex.
Juergen
On 8/1/05, David Liebeherr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any documentation/tutorial available for the Signin Exmaple?
I realy have some problems
23 matches
Mail list logo
