+1
I too agree that people would be more inclined to use databinder (the whole
thing) if they were able to use a models only package first on their "pure"
Wicket projects.
Xavier Hanin wrote:
>
> On 6/27/07, Nathan Hamblen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Xavier Hanin wrote:
>> > I'll try to s
On 6/27/07, Nathan Hamblen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Xavier Hanin wrote:
> I'll try to subscribe to databinder forum (I was not fortunate enough
> first time I tried) and see what nathan think about that. If others
> have a different opinion, let me know.
It's a highly exclusive place, thanks
Xavier Hanin wrote:
> I'll try to subscribe to databinder forum (I was not fortunate enough
> first time I tried) and see what nathan think about that. If others
> have a different opinion, let me know.
It's a highly exclusive place, thanks to link spammers that I would like
to kill. I'll look ou
On 6/27/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just my 2 cents, but i think the databinder project would be a great place
for this.
Indeed it makes sense. I personally don't mind where it goes, or even if it
goes somewhere.
I'll try to subscribe to databinder forum (I was not fortunate e
just my 2 cents, but i think the databinder project would be a great place
for this.
On 6/27/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've blogged about that a few days ago [1], but jonathan told me it might
be interesting to contribute it to wicket contrib or wicket examples. "It"
is a
