thus im quite new,
2[x]
as its the only way to have a preview wich works in WYSIWYG editors and wont
be ** up (hopefully...) by your next designer who changed the text so it
looks better...
On 8/3/06, Dirk Markert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 [x]
2006/8/3, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 08:50 +0200, Korbinian Bachl wrote:
thus im quite new,
2[x]
be ** up (hopefully...) by your next designer who changed the text so it
looks better...
This a good point, with option 1 it is likely that designers touch the
value-attribute. In option 2, it doesn't
1 [X]
Btw.
We are using ${key} everywhere (customized markup parsing) and it's much
more convenient than wicket:message :-)
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute
modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two
1 [ ]
2 [X]
input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/
If you want to express it without a default value, that would be
written as:
input type=submit value=my_key wicket:message=value/
And if Wicket is going to support multiple attributes:
input type=submit
But this:input type=submit value=my_key wicket:message=value/i really don't like.That is worsed of both worlds. You still don't have default/preview but you do have an
extra input attribute to parse. Ok knowing that something must be i18n is easier.But you are right about that it looks neather
2
previewability is one of wicket's strong features
Joni
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:10 -0700, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute
modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two
alternative approaches in mind. For
2 [x]
Eelco Hillenius a écrit :
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute
modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two
alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look
like:
1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/
1 [x]-IgorOn 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attributemodifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have twoalternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either looklike:
1) input type=submit
if we have to choose for one then 2but i think we can support both, i think it can just be a markupfilter/parser implementation per option.johanOn 8/3/06,
Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attributemodifiers all over the place for
Yeah, but we have to choose a default here. Unless you want to support
those two options at the same time.
Eelco
On 8/3/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we have to choose for one then 2
but i think we can support both, i think it can just be a
markupfilter/parser
If you want the opinion of non-committers, here's a strong preference for
2 [X]
The thought of seeing the wicket... text in preview mode really goes
against the grain to me.
-- Scott
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute
modifiers
All votes count for this thread as far as I am concerned.
Eelco
On 8/3/06, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want the opinion of non-committers, here's a strong preference for
2 [X]
The thought of seeing the wicket... text in preview mode really goes
against the grain to me.
2 [x]
Wilko
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/VOTE%3A-how-should-localized-attributes-work--tf2047179.html#a5639800
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
2 [ X ]
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
2
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
2 [x]
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
2 [x]
On 8/3/06, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 [x]
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business
2[x]
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
2 [X]
--- Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to
attach attribute
modifiers all over the place for that sole reason -
we have two
alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this
would either look
like:
1) input type=submit
2 [X]On 8/3/06, MK Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 [X]--- Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason -
we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either
2 [x]2006/8/3, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attributemodifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have twoalternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either looklike:
1) input type=submit
2 [x]
On 8/3/06, Dirk Markert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 [x]
2006/8/3, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute
modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two
alternative approaches in mind. For end-users
2
- Original Message -
From:
Dirk
Markert
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:32
PM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how
should localized attributes work?
2 [x]
2006/8/3, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED
2
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
1 [X]
as in this case every attribute would be assignable from java
Imran
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT
Hey, you cheat! You voted twice! :)
Eelco
On 8/3/06, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 [X]
On 8/3/06, MK Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 [X]
--- Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to
attach attribute
modifiers
he is a witch! throw him in the lake! if he floats that will prove he is a witch and then we burn him. if he drowns he wasnt a witch, we let him go.-IgorOn 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, you cheat! You voted twice! :)Eelco
27 matches
Mail list logo
