date:20070124


and how to really abort the thing on the serverside.

On 1/23/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


no it is not supported right now, but it can be built. open up a new
feature request in our jira and we will look into it. also outline how you
would like the api to look, how are you going to wire it in your javascript.
do you want to basically just set the timeout? or be able to cancel on a
click, etc.

-igor


On 1/22/07, Prashant Khanal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ok the main problem is that i want to include some
 timeout mechanism for ajax operation and to abort the
 request in case it takes considerable time.
 As can be done with XMLHttpRequest using setTimeOut,
 is there any way that i can achive this in wicket.

 So the main reason to cancel is for those ajax
 operation that takes awful long time.

 --- Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Why do you need to cancel it?
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of Prashant Khanal
  Sent: 22. januar 2007 12:09
  To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  Subject: [Wicket-user] how to abort the
  xmlhttprequest
 
  Hello all,
  Is there any way to abort the xmlhttprequest in
  wicket. As XMLHttpRequest object has got abort()
  method to abort the request. Can it be used in
  wicket.
 
 
 
 

 

  We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
  (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures
  list.
  http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
 
 

 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get
  the chance to share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief
  surveys - and earn cash
 

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 -

  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get
  the chance to share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief
  surveys - and earn cash
 

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 





 

 Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peak at the forecast
 with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
 http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather

 -

 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] how to abort the xmlhttprequest


just fire off a new thread or runnable (using a threadpool)
and then connect  that thread to a session so that you can poll for it
when it is finished.
Then you also can say, this takes to long and set a boolean so that the
worker thread does do a terminate as soon as possible

johan


On 1/24/07, Prashant Khanal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


How to use that in a wicket. Can u explain it a bit
more.
--- Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Why not use a worker thread?

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Prashant Khanal
 Sent: 23. januar 2007 04:41
 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] how to abort the
 xmlhttprequest

 Ok the main problem is that i want to include some
 timeout mechanism for ajax operation and to abort
 the
 request in case it takes considerable time.
 As can be done with XMLHttpRequest using setTimeOut,
 is there any way that i can achive this in wicket.

 So the main reason to cancel is for those ajax
 operation that takes awful long time.

 --- Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Why do you need to cancel it?
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of Prashant Khanal
  Sent: 22. januar 2007 12:09
  To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  Subject: [Wicket-user] how to abort the
  xmlhttprequest
 
  Hello all,
  Is there any way to abort the xmlhttprequest in
  wicket. As XMLHttpRequest object has got abort()
  method to abort the request. Can it be used in
  wicket.
 
 
 
 



  We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
  (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures
  list.
  http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
 
 

-
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of
 IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll
 get
  the chance to share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief
  surveys - and earn cash
 

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

-
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of
 IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll
 get
  the chance to share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief
  surveys - and earn cash
 

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 







 Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peak at the forecast
 with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
 http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather


-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get
 the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief
 surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get
 the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief
 surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user







Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.

Re: [Wicket-user] No Page found for component


i see that you are in an init (constructor call) of your page:

myapp.gui.wizards.EditDetailsWizardStep.init(EditDetailsWizardStep.java
:109)

So why does validator run on that? Thats a new component and those don't
have yet (in 1.3) a parent page

johan





On 1/24/07, Tim Squires [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi,

I have a page based on wicket.extensions.wizard.  When the formValidator
identifies an invalid field, I call error(a message) on that
Component.  At that point the following exception is thrown.

java.lang.IllegalStateException: No Page found for component
[MarkupContainer [Component id = status, page = No Page, path =
view:status.DropDownChoice]]
 at wicket.Component.getPage(Component.java:1044)
 at wicket.Component.error(Component.java:680)
 at
myapp.gui.wizards.EditDetailsWizardStep.init(EditDetailsWizardStep.jav
a:109)
...
...

Can anyone shed any light on this problem?  I though all components
would be able to find the containing page?

Thanks,
Tim


The Information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the individuals named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
you should be aware that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding
or other duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited.
The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual
author and not necessarily those of LINK Interchange Network Ltd.
Prior to taking any action based upon this e-mail message you should
seek appropriate confirmation of its authenticity. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Multiple sessions from one client

2007-01-24 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug

Ok, I went with the no-cookies-but-jsession-id-in-url approach and it 
works just fine.

Here's a link to a site that helped me with the Jetty configuration:

http://www.mojavelinux.com/blog/archives/2006/11/disabling_session_cookies_in_jetty/

or - somewhat ugly - in the code:

WebAppContext webAppContext = new WebAppContext();
...
((HashSessionManager) 
(webAppContext.getSessionHandler().getSessionManager())).setUsingCookies(false);

But there is one pitfall: When you switch to not using cookies for the 
session id and a browser still HAS a session cookie, that session cookie 
is - of course - sent as part of the request when you access the 
webapplication again. That causes Wicket to show the session timeout 
page with everything you do (because that session is invalid and the 
cookie is never updated...). So what I did is to set the session cookie 
name to something different than the default JSESSIONID. That doesn't 
keep the browser from still sending the old session cookie as part of 
the request, but Jetty ignores it because it doesn't have the name Jetty 
is looking for.

In code the workaround looks like this:

((HashSessionManager) 
(webAppContext.getSessionHandler().getSessionManager())).setSessionCookie(SOMETHING_OTHER_THAN_JSESSIONID);

Now I can have multiple different sessions in the same browser. Works 
like a charm!

Thank you guys for your help.

- Johannes


Matej Knopp wrote:
 Erik van Oosten wrote:
   
 Short answer: NO.

 Long answer: mostly no, but it strongly depends on the browser.

 Solution: do not use the session (is against Wicket matra anyway) but 
 maintain state in the Wicket components. Make sure that your components 
 are versioned (defaults to on).

 
 Yeah, but this is not a solution always (if you have to for example 
 allow two different users to be logged in for some reason). Only thing 
 I can think of that could work is to disable session cookies (if the 
 container allows it) and use jsessionid in url only. This way you can 
 have different session in every browser window.

 -Matej
   
 Regards,
  Erik.


 Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
 
 Is it possible to have multiple sessions from the same client?
   
   


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

   


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] wicket:head with page


In the wiki, there is a gotcha that look like this :
Adding wicket:head to a Page

wicket:head is intended for panels and borders only. Do not add this to a
page.

The problem is : it is exactly what I wanted to do.  I got a child class
that need to add some css/javascript to the header of the page.  Is it
because our design is too pour or just that this is not true anymore or what
else?  I wanted to have a little more detailed about that.

Thanks

Marc

P.S. : I'll make sure to copy the details into the wiki after :)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page


There is always the classic :
getApplicationSettings ().setInternalErrorPage (MyCustomErrorPage.class);

But that will not give you the exception thrown.

On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi all, I am trying to make a custom exception page.

I have created a class which overrides the onRuntimeException method in
RequestCycle and wicket does not seem to be using.  Do I need to tell it
to use this class, somehow?  Is there anything else I can do?  Basically
I need a custom error page which can display the exception being thrown.

Thanks

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Dreamweaver

2007-01-24 Thread Otan


Just like what I said, I can't find any usecase to make a Dreamweaver
extensions for Wicket.

Who from your team do you expect will use Dreamweaver? The page authors,
right? Page authors who are working with the markup concerns only the
wicket:id attribute and some wicket tags. Databinder or something? Wicket is
not JSF or JSP. The good thing about wicket is that it's so easy to insert
wicket components into the markup by putting only the wicket:id and some
few wicket tags into the wicket markups that make it so Dreamweaver-friendly
and page authors-friendly.

Just my 2 centavos.

On 24/01/07, nilo.de.roock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I was just checking if someone has been doing some DW work. It seems no
one
has.

Just thinking out loud whether I should develop something myself ...

( ... )

I agree that a Dreamweaver extension for Wicket may seem useless or
overkill
if you are a Java developer. Developers prefer vi over DW, I suppose. But
then ( Java ) developers usually don't excel in designing websites ( have
a
look at http://www.csszengarden.com/ to see what designers can do without
even touching html, let alone if you give them the freedom to change html
as
well ). The explanation is probably that designers are better in
communicating with end-users than developers are.

I strongly propose seperating design ( including coding html and css ) and
technical work from architectural design to coding Java.  But I am getting
off-topic, to the point: a Dreanweaver extension for Wicket.

I am thinking of... ( in order of increasing complexity )

#1 The tool should communicate clearly which components the Wicket
framework
has to offer, what they do and how they should be used.

#2 The tool should take care of coding wicket:id attributes everywhere,
either real-time or as a sort of pre-compile before handing over to the
Java
team.

#3 The tool should validate code and naming style.

#4 There should be an option to temporarily replace data components with
dummy data.

#5 A utility to wicket-ize existing sites. It should be possible to
automatically generate the .html part of an existing ( data driven )
website.

I am always open to other ideas...

I am currently studying Wicket / Databinder as a follow-up of a selection
project. The product of my study will be a small site including a set of (
customized ) how to's for developing wicket pages. I'll try to develop a
Dreamweaver extension as well covering #1, #2 and if time permits #3 and /
or #4. I have to dive into DW but if I remember well there is similar
stuff
for PHP templating so it shouldn't be too hard.

I'll let you know when I have to something which I can show.
- nilo de roock



Otan wrote:

 Yeah, Wicket made it possible for us to use dreamweaver again for
 componentized webpages. Based from my experience, I can't find any
usecase
 to make a Dreamweaver extensions for Wicket.

 On 24/01/07, nilo.de.roock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Wicket makes coding fun again! I don't have a Mac but I do have
 Dreamweaver
 8. It has been a while since I have been using Dreamweaver so I almost
 forgot what a superb program it still is. - ( I hope it is not against
 Wicket ethics to discuss commercial tool$. )

 I would like to ask if anyone else is on this list is using Dreamweaver
 to
 develop and communicate gui designs to users?

 If so, has anyone customized and / or extended Dreamweaver to develop
and
 validate Wicket html?

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Dreamweaver-tf3070690.html#a8535117
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Dreamweaver-tf3070690.html#a8559297
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll

[Wicket-user] [wicket-user] change content of modalwindow

2007-01-24 Thread Paul Maarschalkerweerd


Hi,

I want to change the content of a modalwindow, to do this I use the method
setContent. But the strange thing is that a new window appears in front of
the old one. I don't understand why is that.

I create a modalwindow on a page, set the content with the setContent method
and open it with an ajaxlink. I pass the modalWindow to the new panel via
the contructor. The new panel has also an ajaxlink where I set the new
content. When I click that link a new modalWindow appears in de the screen
in front of the first.

Maybe this isn't the right way to do it.

Can somebody help me with this problem?

Thnx

Paul
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page

2007-01-24 Thread Otan


The following works for me:

!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xmlns:wicket=
http://www.wicketframework.org;
   head
   title~/title
   wicket:head
   script language=javascript type=text/javascript
   alert('Content of the wicket:head gets contributed into the
final page.');
   /script
   /wicket:head
   /head
   body
   wicket:extend
   This is a child markup and here is its content. Notice that I
have a wicket:head above.
   /wicket:extend
   /body
/html



On 25/01/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


In the wiki, there is a gotcha that look like this :
Adding wicket:head to a Page

wicket:head is intended for panels and borders only. Do not add this to
a page.

The problem is : it is exactly what I wanted to do.  I got a child class
that need to add some css/javascript to the header of the page.  Is it
because our design is too pour or just that this is not true anymore or what
else?  I wanted to have a little more detailed about that.

Thanks

Marc

P.S. : I'll make sure to copy the details into the wiki after :)


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page


Yeah, I know, I also implemented something and It work.  But since it is in
the gotcha part of the wiki, this mean that we should not do this.  But
since it work, I don't know why...

Marc

On 1/24/07, Otan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


The following works for me:

!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd 
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xmlns:wicket=
http://www.wicketframework.org;
head
title~/title
wicket:head
script language=javascript type=text/javascript
alert(' Content of the wicket:head gets contributed into
the final page.');
/script
/wicket:head
/head
body
wicket:extend
This is a child markup and here is its content. Notice that I
have a wicket:head above.
/wicket:extend
/body
/html



On 25/01/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

 In the wiki, there is a gotcha that look like this :
 Adding wicket:head to a Page

 wicket:head is intended for panels and borders only. Do not add this
 to a page.

 The problem is : it is exactly what I wanted to do.  I got a child class
 that need to add some css/javascript to the header of the page.  Is it
 because our design is too pour or just that this is not true anymore or what
 else?  I wanted to have a little more detailed about that.

 Thanks

 Marc

 P.S. : I'll make sure to copy the details into the wiki after :)



 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page

2007-01-24 Thread Timo Rantalaiho

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Marc-Andre Houle wrote:
 In the wiki, there is a gotcha that look like this :
 Adding wicket:head to a Page
 
 wicket:head is intended for panels and borders only. Do not add this to a
 page.
 
 The problem is : it is exactly what I wanted to do.  I got a child class
 that need to add some css/javascript to the header of the page.  Is it
 because our design is too pour or just that this is not true anymore or what
 else?  I wanted to have a little more detailed about that.

I think that it might be outdated, I take that you mean

  http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/best-practices-and-gotchas.html

And here there seems to be the same issue

  http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/consistent-page-layout-using-borders.html

Maybe there should be the same point about markup
inheritance as here:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg17430.html

 P.S. : I'll make sure to copy the details into the wiki after :)

Is it publicly editable?

-- 
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

2007-01-24 Thread Apaar Trivedi

Thank you for that but I also need to be able to display the original
exception being thrown, so this method did not work for me.

 

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Marc-Andre Houle
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:02 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

 

There is always the classic : 
 getApplicationSettings ().setInternalErrorPage
(MyCustomErrorPage.class);

But that will not give you the exception thrown.

On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi all, I am trying to make a custom exception page.

I have created a class which overrides the onRuntimeException method in
RequestCycle and wicket does not seem to be using.  Do I need to tell it
to use this class, somehow?  Is there anything else I can do?  Basically

I need a custom error page which can display the exception being thrown.

Thanks


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT 
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
V
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

 

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Listing of the data

see DataTable in wicket-extensions

there is an example in wicket-examples under repeaters

-igor


On 1/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello All,
 I need to be able to have a generic component which I can use to list the
 data row by row. Now there is a trick number of columns can vary every time
 and I do not want to define a new html document for every time(number of
 columns in my table is data driven coming out of the db).

 THank you
 Gennadiy


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page


Wiki : Yes it is if you create an account.

The comment of igor in the mailling list archive is directly related to what
I want to do.

What I want to know is : Why is it not in the wiki, should I update the
wiki?  I don't want to disturb developer because they surely have something
else to do, but I would like to clear this thing out in my head...

Marc

On 1/24/07, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Marc-Andre Houle wrote:
 In the wiki, there is a gotcha that look like this :
 Adding wicket:head to a Page

 wicket:head is intended for panels and borders only. Do not add this
to a
 page.

 The problem is : it is exactly what I wanted to do.  I got a child class
 that need to add some css/javascript to the header of the page.  Is it
 because our design is too pour or just that this is not true anymore or
what
 else?  I wanted to have a little more detailed about that.

I think that it might be outdated, I take that you mean

  http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/best-practices-and-gotchas.html

And here there seems to be the same issue

  http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/consistent-page-layout-using-borders.html

Maybe there should be the same point about markup
inheritance as here:


http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg17430.html

 P.S. : I'll make sure to copy the details into the wiki after :)

Is it publicly editable?

--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Issues with Validators


yep, that will do it

-igor


On 1/24/07, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


private class ExistingUserValidator extends StringValidator{

public void onValidate(FormComponent formComponent, String string)
{
//lookup database
//if username taken
// error(formComponent)
}
protected String resourceKey(FormComponent formComponent)
{
return ExistingUserValidator ;
}

}

?? is it

On 1/24/07, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 What are proper ways to build custom validators, i seem to loose touch
 when i checked IValidator doc and i saw THIS IS NOT PART OF PUBLIC API and
 then I looked at CustomValidator and every thing in deprecated. Is there any
 newest approach for writing a custom validator

 For instance I want to validate against a database for a uniqueContraint
 situation.

 Any latest tips?

 thanks







-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

2007-01-24 Thread Apaar Trivedi

Thank you, I am working on this and making some progress.  I am having
trouble implementing the methods for getProcessor(), newClientInfo() and
redirectTo() when I extend the RequestCycle.

What should getProcessor and newClientInfo be returning?  

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
Hillenius
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:23 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

Override WebApplication#getDefaultRequestCycleFactory and provide the
factory to create your custom request cycle. For instance:

public class MyApplication extends WebApplication implements
IRequestCycleFactory {

protected IRequestCycleFactory getDefaultRequestCycleFactory() {
return this;
}

public RequestCycle newRequestCycle(Session session, Request
request,
Response response) {
return new MyRequestCycle(session, request, response);
}
...

where you let your application class be the factory.

Eelco


On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all, I am trying to make a custom exception page.

 I have created a class which overrides the onRuntimeException method
in
 RequestCycle and wicket does not seem to be using.  Do I need to tell
it
 to use this class, somehow?  Is there anything else I can do?
Basically
 I need a custom error page which can display the exception being
thrown.

 Thanks



-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
V
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
V
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

That's where your custom request cycle comes in: override
onRuntimeException in it and return the page you want, doing anything
with the passed in exception you like.

Eelco


On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





 Thank you for that but I also need to be able to display the original
 exception being thrown, so this method did not work for me.




  


 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Marc-Andre Houle
  Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:02 AM
  To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page




 There is always the classic :
   getApplicationSettings ().setInternalErrorPage (MyCustomErrorPage.class);

  But that will not give you the exception thrown.


 On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all, I am trying to make a custom exception page.

  I have created a class which overrides the onRuntimeException method in
  RequestCycle and wicket does not seem to be using.  Do I need to tell it
  to use this class, somehow?  Is there anything else I can do?  Basically
  I need a custom error page which can display the exception being thrown.

  Thanks

 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] [wicket-user] change content of modalwindow


how about some code, sounds like you are maybe opening another modal window
with one already open?

-igor

On 1/24/07, Paul Maarschalkerweerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi,

I want to change the content of a modalwindow, to do this I use the method
setContent. But the strange thing is that a new window appears in front of
the old one. I don't understand why is that.

I create a modalwindow on a page, set the content with the setContent
method and open it with an ajaxlink. I pass the modalWindow to the new panel
via the contructor. The new panel has also an ajaxlink where I set the new
content. When I click that link a new modalWindow appears in de the screen
in front of the first.

Maybe this isn't the right way to do it.

Can somebody help me with this problem?

Thnx

Paul








-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page

I changed the WIKI entry. Thanks for finding.

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page

On 1/24/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In the wiki, there is a gotcha that look like this :
 Adding wicket:head to a Page

 wicket:head is intended for panels and borders only. Do not add this to a
 page.

 The problem is : it is exactly what I wanted to do.  I got a child class
 that need to add some css/javascript to the header of the page.  Is it
 because our design is too pour or just that this is not true anymore or what
 else?  I wanted to have a little more detailed about that.
 Thanks

The WIKI entry was wrong or at least outdated. I changed it. Note that
can can use add(HeaderContributor.forJavaScript(..)) etc for the same
thing.

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

You should extend WebRequestCycle rather than RequestCycle.

Eelco

On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thank you, I am working on this and making some progress.  I am having
 trouble implementing the methods for getProcessor(), newClientInfo() and
 redirectTo() when I extend the RequestCycle.

 What should getProcessor and newClientInfo be returning?

 Thanks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
 Hillenius
 Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:23 AM
 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

 Override WebApplication#getDefaultRequestCycleFactory and provide the
 factory to create your custom request cycle. For instance:

 public class MyApplication extends WebApplication implements
 IRequestCycleFactory {

 protected IRequestCycleFactory getDefaultRequestCycleFactory() {
 return this;
 }

 public RequestCycle newRequestCycle(Session session, Request
 request,
 Response response) {
 return new MyRequestCycle(session, request, response);
 }
 ...

 where you let your application class be the factory.

 Eelco


 On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi all, I am trying to make a custom exception page.
 
  I have created a class which overrides the onRuntimeException method
 in
  RequestCycle and wicket does not seem to be using.  Do I need to tell
 it
  to use this class, somehow?  Is there anything else I can do?
 Basically
  I need a custom error page which can display the exception being
 thrown.
 
  Thanks
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
 V
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 

 
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
 V
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page


Yeah, but when you have big chunk and everything, you don't necessary want
this to be in the Java world.  At least, that what I think since I want all
my decoration in html and all my logic in java...

On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 1/24/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In the wiki, there is a gotcha that look like this :
 Adding wicket:head to a Page

 wicket:head is intended for panels and borders only. Do not add this
to a
 page.

 The problem is : it is exactly what I wanted to do.  I got a child class
 that need to add some css/javascript to the header of the page.  Is it
 because our design is too pour or just that this is not true anymore or
what
 else?  I wanted to have a little more detailed about that.
 Thanks

The WIKI entry was wrong or at least outdated. I changed it. Note that
can can use add(HeaderContributor.forJavaScript(..)) etc for the same
thing.

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] how to use GridView in wicket 2.0 snapshot?

2007-01-24 Thread tooy li(Gmail)

hi,
it's always complains that 
  Markup with path 'check' not found in fragment: roleList   table  
   tr wicket:id=roleList td align=center  
wicket:id=cols  input type=checkbox wicket:id=check /  
   span wicket:id=role/span/td /tr 
/tableGridViewString gridView = new GridViewString(roles, roleList, 
dataProvider) {
   protected void populateItem(ItemString item) {
new CheckString(item, check, item.getModel());
new Label(item, role, (String) item.getModelObject());
   }
   @Override
   protected void populateEmptyItem(Item arg0) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub

   }
  
  };

I write these code follow the example of  1.2 version. and I also find the 
gridview is disappear in the current one snapshot of wicket 2.0.
Is there anyone can help me ?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] how to use GridView in wicket 2.0 snapshot?


gridview has moved from extensions to core, but doesnt yet work with
the 2.0snapshots

-igor


On 1/24/07, tooy li(Gmail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


hi,
it's always complains that
 Markup with path 'check' not found in fragment: roleList   table
tr wicket:id=roleList td
align=center  wicket:id=cols  input type=checkbox
wicket:id=check / span
wicket:id=role/span/td /tr
/tableGridViewString gridView = new GridViewString(roles, roleList,
dataProvider) {
   protected void populateItem(ItemString item) {
new CheckString(item, check, item.getModel());
new Label(item, role, (String) item.getModelObject());
   }
   @Override
   protected void populateEmptyItem(Item arg0) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub

   }

  };

I write these code follow the example of  1.2 version. and I also find the
gridview is disappear in the current one snapshot of wicket 2.0.
Is there anyone can help me ?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page

Sure. Just wanted to point out that there is an alternative way, which
is not better or worse, just different :)

Eelco

On 1/24/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yeah, but when you have big chunk and everything, you don't necessary want
 this to be in the Java world.  At least, that what I think since I want all
 my decoration in html and all my logic in java...


 On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On 1/24/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   In the wiki, there is a gotcha that look like this :
   Adding wicket:head to a Page
  
   wicket:head is intended for panels and borders only. Do not add this
 to a
   page.
  
   The problem is : it is exactly what I wanted to do.  I got a child class
   that need to add some css/javascript to the header of the page.  Is it
   because our design is too pour or just that this is not true anymore or
 what
   else?  I wanted to have a little more detailed about that.
   Thanks
 
  The WIKI entry was wrong or at least outdated. I changed it. Note that
  can can use add(HeaderContributor.forJavaScript(..)) etc for the same
  thing.
 
  Eelco
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

2007-01-24 Thread Apaar Trivedi

When I do this, does my application still need to implement
IRequestCycleFactory? 

If so, how do I return my extended WebRequestCycle though I must be
implementing newWebRequestCycle?  If I sound confused on this, I
certainly am, so thanks for your patience.

What I have right now is extending WebRequestCycle and using that to
override onRuntimeException.


And in my extended application I am implementing IRequestCycleFactory.  



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
Hillenius
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:06 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

You should extend WebRequestCycle rather than RequestCycle.

Eelco

On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thank you, I am working on this and making some progress.  I am having
 trouble implementing the methods for getProcessor(), newClientInfo()
and
 redirectTo() when I extend the RequestCycle.

 What should getProcessor and newClientInfo be returning?

 Thanks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
 Hillenius
 Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:23 AM
 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

 Override WebApplication#getDefaultRequestCycleFactory and provide the
 factory to create your custom request cycle. For instance:

 public class MyApplication extends WebApplication implements
 IRequestCycleFactory {

 protected IRequestCycleFactory getDefaultRequestCycleFactory()
{
 return this;
 }

 public RequestCycle newRequestCycle(Session session, Request
 request,
 Response response) {
 return new MyRequestCycle(session, request, response);
 }
 ...

 where you let your application class be the factory.

 Eelco


 On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi all, I am trying to make a custom exception page.
 
  I have created a class which overrides the onRuntimeException method
 in
  RequestCycle and wicket does not seem to be using.  Do I need to
tell
 it
  to use this class, somehow?  Is there anything else I can do?
 Basically
  I need a custom error page which can display the exception being
 thrown.
 
  Thanks
 
 


 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
cash
 

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
 V
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 



 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
 V
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
V
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
V
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

What you do is let your application provide a request cycle *factory*.
You do this by overriding method  getDefaultRequestCycleFactory from
Application. That method returns an instance of IRequestCycleFactory,
which produces the custom request cycle. Now, to make life a little
bit easier and avoid creating a separate class for this, we can just
let your application class implement the IRequestCycleFactory
interface, return itself in method getDefaultRequestCycleFactory. The
newRequestCycle method is the factory method to create the custom
request cycle instances. It will be called automatically if you follow
this pattern.

Eelco


On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When I do this, does my application still need to implement
 IRequestCycleFactory?

 If so, how do I return my extended WebRequestCycle though I must be
 implementing newWebRequestCycle?  If I sound confused on this, I
 certainly am, so thanks for your patience.

 What I have right now is extending WebRequestCycle and using that to
 override onRuntimeException.


 And in my extended application I am implementing IRequestCycleFactory.



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
 Hillenius
 Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:06 AM
 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page

 You should extend WebRequestCycle rather than RequestCycle.

 Eelco

 On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thank you, I am working on this and making some progress.  I am having
  trouble implementing the methods for getProcessor(), newClientInfo()
 and
  redirectTo() when I extend the RequestCycle.
 
  What should getProcessor and newClientInfo be returning?
 
  Thanks
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
  Hillenius
  Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:23 AM
  To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Custom exception page
 
  Override WebApplication#getDefaultRequestCycleFactory and provide the
  factory to create your custom request cycle. For instance:
 
  public class MyApplication extends WebApplication implements
  IRequestCycleFactory {
 
  protected IRequestCycleFactory getDefaultRequestCycleFactory()
 {
  return this;
  }
 
  public RequestCycle newRequestCycle(Session session, Request
  request,
  Response response) {
  return new MyRequestCycle(session, request, response);
  }
  ...
 
  where you let your application class be the factory.
 
  Eelco
 
 
  On 1/24/07, Apaar Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hi all, I am trying to make a custom exception page.
  
   I have created a class which overrides the onRuntimeException method
  in
   RequestCycle and wicket does not seem to be using.  Do I need to
 tell
  it
   to use this class, somehow?  Is there anything else I can do?
  Basically
   I need a custom error page which can display the exception being
  thrown.
  
   Thanks
  
  
 
 
  -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
  share your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
 cash
  
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
  V
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
 
 
 
  -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
  V
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
 V
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 

 
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page

2007-01-24 Thread Timo Rantalaiho

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
 I changed the WIKI entry. Thanks for finding.

This remains

   Note: the use of wicket:head should not even be necessary at all
   in a Page, since everything in the head of a Page is already
   contributed to the output.

   The development team is currently considering throwing an exception
   if wicket:head is used in a Page component.

   http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/consistent-page-layout-using-borders.html

or should the entire page be removed? In the top it says

Markup inheritance is much more convenient to use than Borders.
Everything below is more complicated than necessary.

:)

-- 
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] error on the faq


There is a typo in the faq -- which hit one our Wicket test driver
developers.  The last FAQ How can I hide markup and/or components? should
have

   tr wicket:id=wicket-hideme

instead of

   tr id=wicket-hideme

Also, there are CDATA tags wrapping each of the code examples.

Cheers, Scott


![CDATA[
WebMarkupContainer hideme = new WebMarkupContainer(hideme);
hideme.setVisible(false);

html
body
table
tr id = wicket-hideme
tdthis row will be hidden/td
/tr
tr
tdthis row will not be hidden/td
/tr
/table
/body
/html
]]



--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] DatePicker and ModalWindow


Now you're just going to make me lazier.  :)  Thanks.

On 1/24/07, Prashant Khanal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Well use this  in ur css file:
.calendar, .calendar table{
z-index: 10[ or suitable value];
}
This will make your datepicker appear in front of the
modal window.

--- Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Note to self: must learn css better.  Thanks.

 On 1/23/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  you have to use css to set a higher zvalue for the
 datepicker popup
 
  -igor
 
 
  On 1/23/07, Scott Swank  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
   I put a DatePicker in a form that is in a
 ModalWindow.  The DatePicker
   rendered below the ModalWindow (z height) and
 was not active because only
   the modal window was active.  Is this anything
 like a known issue?  I search
   the history of this list and the wiki without
 success.
  
   Thanks,
   Scott
  
   --
   Scott Swank
   reformed mathematician
  
  

-
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of
 IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll
 get the chance to share
   your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief
 surveys - and earn cash
  
  

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  
 
 

-
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of
 IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll
 get the chance to share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief
 surveys - and earn cash
 

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 


 --
 Scott Swank
 reformed mathematician
 
-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get
 the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief
 surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user







No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user





--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Tracking session expire exception


Is anything new about this?
I also want to know how it is about this issue :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-206

Thanks.

Marc

On 1/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


yes i see it, will look it at asap

On 1/22/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think the mail didn't pass through sf.net.  So, I try again.

 Marc

 On 1/16/07, Marc-Andre Houle  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Here is the example.
  Open two tabs with the same page, in each one of them, click on page
  2, and see the page map being the same :)
 
  Marc
 
  P.S. : I included only the source directory since it would be too big
  to include everything!  Just change the src directory of a quickstart
  project.
 
  On 1/16/07, Johan Compagner  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
   Now, the output look like this :
I access the index page first time :
index Page map is :null
  
  
   correct.
  
   I access the index page from another tab :
index Page map is :null
index Page map is :wicket-0
  
  
   correct.
   First is rendered in default pagemap.
   Then we detect a new window and do a bookmarkable redirect to a
   wicket generated pagemap. (wicket-0)
  
  
   I access Page2 from the whatever link (I mean, the two tabs have the
same result :
Page 2 map is :null
  
  
   When you click on the link in the window that has wicket=0 pagemap
   It should give you that pagemap there. If that is not the case can
   you make a quickstart app?
  
   johan
  
  
  
   -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
   share your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
   cash
  
   http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  
 
 


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user





-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] [wicket-user] change content of modalwindow

2007-01-24 Thread Paul Maarschalkerweerd


the basepage:
http://webical.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/webical/trunk/src/main/java/org/webical/web/components/CalendarDayViewPanel.java?view=markup

and the panels:
http://webical.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/webical/trunk/src/main/java/org/webical/web/components/EditAllOrOneEventDecisionPanel.java?view=markup
http://webical.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/webical/trunk/src/main/java/org/webical/web/components/EventAddEditPanel.java?view=markup

Here are the snipplets:

This is the panel where the user clicks on an event, the details are shown
in the modalwindow

if(!event.isAllDay()  event.getDtStart() != null  event.getDtEnd() !=
null){
   YUICalendarEvent yuiCalendarEvent = new
YUICalendarEvent(DAY_VIEW_YUI_EVENT_OBJECT){

   private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

   @Override
   public void onEventClicked(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
   eventSelectionListener.eventSelected(event, false,
EventSelectionListener.DEFAULT_ALL_EVENTS, gregorianCalendar,target,
modalWindow);
   }
   };


this is the eventSelected method from the basepage

public void eventSelected(Event event, boolean edit, int editAmount,
GregorianCalendar calendar, AjaxRequestTarget target, ModalWindow
modalWindow) {

  
   modalWindow.setContent(new
EditAllOrOneEventDecisionPanel(modalWindow.getContentId(), event,
getEventSelectionListener(),
   getPanelChangeLister(), calendar,
modalWindow));
   modalWindow.show(target);

  

}

this is the part from the Panel where the content should be changed :

...
AjaxLink editOnlyThisEventLink = new
AjaxLink(EVENT_EDIT_ONLY_THIS_INSTANCE_MARKUP_ID){

   private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

   @Override
   public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
   eventSelectionListener.eventSelected(event, true,
EventSelectionListener.EDIT_ONE_EVENT, calendar, target, modalWindow);


   }
   };
...

and back on the basepage an event is selected an shown in a edit panel :

public void eventSelected(Event event, boolean edit, int editAmount,
GregorianCalendar calendar, AjaxRequestTarget target, ModalWindow
modalWindow) {
...
   modalWindow.setContent(new EventAddEditPanel(
modalWindow.getContentId(),
   getAddEditFormListener(get(
modalWindow.getContentId())),event,

((WebicalSession)BasePage.this.getSession()).getUser(), false, new
GregorianCalendar(), getEventSelectionListener()));
   modalWindow.show(target);
...
}



Hope this is useful!

Paul





On 1/24/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


how about some code, sounds like you are maybe opening another modal
window with one already open?

-igor

On 1/24/07, Paul Maarschalkerweerd  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

 I want to change the content of a modalwindow, to do this I use the
 method setContent. But the strange thing is that a new window appears in
 front of the old one. I don't understand why is that.

 I create a modalwindow on a page, set the content with the setContent
 method and open it with an ajaxlink. I pass the modalWindow to the new panel
 via the contructor. The new panel has also an ajaxlink where I set the new
 content. When I click that link a new modalWindow appears in de the screen
 in front of the first.

 Maybe this isn't the right way to do it.

 Can somebody help me with this problem?

 Thnx

 Paul









 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___

[Wicket-user] Dojo contrib: WicketServlet cannot be changed once it is set

2007-01-24 Thread Tim Squires

Hi,

I added wicket-contrib-dojo 0.3.1 to app and when it's redeployed I
get...

java.lang.IllegalStateException: WicketServlet cannot be changed once it
is set

wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.setWicketServlet(WebApplication.java
:400)
wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.init(WicketServlet.java:283)
javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.java:211)

org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(Authenticator
Base.java:524)

org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java
:105)

org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:1
48)

org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:86
9)

org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.proc
essConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:664)

org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint
.java:527)

org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollow
erWorkerThread.java:80)

org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool
.java:684)
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

It does not even need to reference any of the contrib-dojo classes to
break it.

The app uses tomcat form based auth (via NTLM) then forwards to the
wicket servlet, it's after the user is authenicated that the exception
is thrown.

Remove the wicket-contrib-dojo jar from the classpath and everything
works again.

Any ideas where I could start looking for the problem?

I'm actually just after FXFeedbackIndicator - are there any other
alternatives that people are using?

Wicket: 1.2.4
Wicket-contrib-dojo 0.3.1
Tomcat 5.5.20
Java: 1.5

Thanks for your time,
Tim


The Information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the individuals named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
you should be aware that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding
or other duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited.
The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual
author and not necessarily those of LINK Interchange Network Ltd.
Prior to taking any action based upon this e-mail message you should
seek appropriate confirmation of its authenticity. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page

Changed it, thanks,

Eelco


On 1/24/07, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
  I changed the WIKI entry. Thanks for finding.

 This remains

Note: the use of wicket:head should not even be necessary at all
in a Page, since everything in the head of a Page is already
contributed to the output.

The development team is currently considering throwing an exception
if wicket:head is used in a Page component.

http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/consistent-page-layout-using-borders.html

 or should the entire page be removed? In the top it says

 Markup inheritance is much more convenient to use than Borders.
 Everything below is more complicated than necessary.

 :)

 --
 Timo Rantalaiho
 Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 

 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] error on the faq

Anyone coming across such typos/ small errors that are obvious, please
feel free to fix them right away.

Eelco


On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 There is a typo in the faq -- which hit one our Wicket test driver
 developers.  The last FAQ How can I hide markup and/or components? should
 have

 tr wicket:id=wicket-hideme

 instead of

  tr id=wicket-hideme

 Also, there are CDATA tags wrapping each of the code examples.

 Cheers, Scott


 ![CDATA[
 WebMarkupContainer hideme = new WebMarkupContainer(hideme);

 hideme.setVisible(false);

 html
 body
  table
  tr id = wicket-hideme
  tdthis row will be hidden/td

  /tr
  tr
  tdthis row will not be hidden/td
  /tr
  /table
 /body
 /html
 ]]


 --
 Scott Swank
 reformed mathematician
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] error on the faq

Oh, that is a bit difficult on the public site :)

Eelco


On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Anyone coming across such typos/ small errors that are obvious, please
 feel free to fix them right away.

 Eelco


 On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  There is a typo in the faq -- which hit one our Wicket test driver
  developers.  The last FAQ How can I hide markup and/or components? should
  have
 
  tr wicket:id=wicket-hideme
 
  instead of
 
   tr id=wicket-hideme
 
  Also, there are CDATA tags wrapping each of the code examples.
 
  Cheers, Scott
 
 
  ![CDATA[
  WebMarkupContainer hideme = new WebMarkupContainer(hideme);
 
  hideme.setVisible(false);
 
  html
  body
   table
   tr id = wicket-hideme
   tdthis row will be hidden/td
 
   /tr
   tr
   tdthis row will not be hidden/td
   /tr
   /table
  /body
  /html
  ]]
 
 
  --
  Scott Swank
  reformed mathematician
  -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
  http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] error on the faq

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-235

On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Oh, that is a bit difficult on the public site :)

 Eelco


 On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Anyone coming across such typos/ small errors that are obvious, please
  feel free to fix them right away.
 
  Eelco
 
 
  On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   There is a typo in the faq -- which hit one our Wicket test driver
   developers.  The last FAQ How can I hide markup and/or components? 
   should
   have
  
   tr wicket:id=wicket-hideme
  
   instead of
  
tr id=wicket-hideme
  
   Also, there are CDATA tags wrapping each of the code examples.
  
   Cheers, Scott
  
  
   ![CDATA[
   WebMarkupContainer hideme = new WebMarkupContainer(hideme);
  
   hideme.setVisible(false);
  
   html
   body
table
tr id = wicket-hideme
tdthis row will be hidden/td
  
/tr
tr
tdthis row will not be hidden/td
/tr
/table
   /body
   /html
   ]]
  
  
   --
   Scott Swank
   reformed mathematician
   -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
   your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
   http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  
 


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] error on the faq


kinda  :)

On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Oh, that is a bit difficult on the public site :)

Eelco


On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Anyone coming across such typos/ small errors that are obvious, please
 feel free to fix them right away.

 Eelco


 On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  There is a typo in the faq -- which hit one our Wicket test driver
  developers.  The last FAQ How can I hide markup and/or components?
should
  have
 
  tr wicket:id=wicket-hideme
 
  instead of
 
   tr id=wicket-hideme
 
  Also, there are CDATA tags wrapping each of the code examples.
 
  Cheers, Scott
 
 
  ![CDATA[
  WebMarkupContainer hideme = new WebMarkupContainer(hideme);
 
  hideme.setVisible(false);
 
  html
  body
   table
   tr id = wicket-hideme
   tdthis row will be hidden/td
 
   /tr
   tr
   tdthis row will not be hidden/td
   /tr
   /table
  /body
  /html
  ]]
 
 
  --
  Scott Swank
  reformed mathematician
 
-
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user





--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

The application I'm building must always have bookmarkable URLs which contain
all page parameters needed to reconstruct the page.

Achieved this currently by letting all page events update state/model, then
redirect to a new URL based on that state, so that the URL includes the new
state. But this has the downside of generating a new page every time, so I
was trying to find a way to remove the old pages which I know I don't need,
since the application is all bookmarkable URLs anyway.

I realize we are killing Wicket back button support, but since our entire
app has bookmarkable URLs anyway, I think we'll be fine. We don't need a
whole lot of state preserved from one page to the next, and where we do
we'll implement the flow with ajax anyway, probably, all on a single page.

Still not sure if my approach makes sense, this is just what I've worked out
so far.

If anyone has any tips on how better to approach this, I'd love to hear
them. I'm getting a sense that Wicket is built more to support stateful
flows managed entirely by Wicket than to support a whole slew of
bookmarkable URLs. If there is a way I can keep using the wicket event
framework such that it posts page parameters in the URL somehow against
bookmarkable URLs, it would be much easier than having to do it myself.

-Jason

igor.vaynberg wrote:

you do realize that by doing this you are completely killing the back
button
support in your app

-igor

On 1/23/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Eelco Hillenius wrote:

Well, every user (session) will use memory, correct. But only to a
certain limit. Wicket 1.2 holds a couple of page/ versions in a
session, and Wicket 2.0 by default only holds the current one. So the
creation of a fresh instance (e.g. a bookmarkable page) will replace
another one. Hence, how much memory you'll need is a simple function
of the number of concurrent sessions times the size of your session
and page(s) in it.

How can I instruct Wicket not to maintain the multiple versions of a
given
page within the session? I've tried the following but when I dump the
session contents I still see multiple page versions:

getSessionSettings().setMaxPageMaps(1);
getPageSettings().setMaxPageVersions(1);

Am I missing the boat on this entirely?

-Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Strategy-to-avoid-new-instances-of-pages-and-panels-tf2566413.html#a8553452
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Strategy-to-avoid-new-instances-of-pages-and-panels-tf2566413.html#a8570548
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

I think the current method name makes sense, but what is unclear is whether
the CURRENT page is taking up one of the positions. I would think setting
the max to 1 would ensure that the pagemap contains the current page and no
others. If in fact the current page doesn't need room in the page map, then
I guess 0 would make more sense. I think adding detail to the javadoc should
be sufficient to clear up this ambiguity.

Johan Compagner wrote:

set the max to 0 then the change list of the version manager will really
not
contain anything

this is the test: (after the new one is added to the list)

// If stack is overfull, remove oldest entry
if (getVersions() maxVersions)
{
expireOldestVersion();
}

What is logical? max versions is that also counting the current one?
What is the best English for this??
should we better express it like: setMaxPageUndoBuffer() ??

johan

On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Eelco Hillenius wrote:

How can I instruct Wicket not to maintain the multiple versions of a
given
page within the session? I've tried the following but when I dump the
session contents I still see multiple page versions:

getSessionSettings().setMaxPageMaps(1);
getPageSettings().setMaxPageVersions(1);

Am I missing the boat on this entirely?

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Strategy-to-avoid-new-instances-of-pages-and-panels-tf2566413.html#a8570594
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Tracking session expire exception


Ok, I got news about the first page expired problem.  Problems with page map
that I said before and in the JIRA issue are still there, but the page
expire is gone.  Here is why :
In the pop up, I created a bookmarkable page link like this :

String parentPageMap = wicket:default;
if(pp != null)
{
   parentPageMap = (String)pp.get (parent_page_map);
}
Class pageClass = SomePage.class;
BookmarkablePageLink bpl = new BookmarkablePageLink(link, pageClass);
bpl.setPageMap (PageMap.forName (parentPageMap));
bpl.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(target, parentPageMap));
add(bpl);

The problem with this, it is that it create a new page map.  So, because
there is a new pagemap, the session expire when I try to access things from
the session.

I posted because it is pratical to have an archive that describe solutions
found! :)  It was entirely my fault, but, anyway!



On 1/24/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Is anything new about this?
I also want to know how it is about this issue :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-206

Thanks.

Marc

On 1/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 yes i see it, will look it at asap

 On 1/22/07, Marc-Andre Houle  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I think the mail didn't pass through sf.net.  So, I try again.
 
  Marc
 
  On 1/16/07, Marc-Andre Houle  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Here is the example.
   Open two tabs with the same page, in each one of them, click on page
   2, and see the page map being the same :)
  
   Marc
  
   P.S. : I included only the source directory since it would be too
   big to include everything!  Just change the src directory of a quickstart
   project.
  
   On 1/16/07, Johan Compagner  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   
Now, the output look like this :
 I access the index page first time :
 index Page map is :null
   
   
correct.
   
I access the index page from another tab :
 index Page map is :null
 index Page map is :wicket-0
   
   
correct.
First is rendered in default pagemap.
Then we detect a new window and do a bookmarkable redirect to a
wicket generated pagemap. (wicket-0)
   
   
I access Page2 from the whatever link (I mean, the two tabs have
 the same result :
 Page 2 map is :null
   
   
When you click on the link in the window that has wicket=0 pagemap
It should give you that pagemap there. If that is not the case can
you make a quickstart app?
   
johan
   
   
   

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
cash
   

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
   
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
   
   
   
  
  
 
 
  -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
  share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
  http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Client-side form validation in Wicket 1.2 or 1.3

2007-01-24 Thread Vincent Demay

Hi,

We make some client-side validation (not also client-side but with ajax) 
in Wicket-Contrib-Dojo. But it is not as powerfull as we expected for 
the moment because we do not have time to do that for the moment. You 
can see a   live demo here :
http://www.demay-fr.net:8080/WCD13/app : it is the last 
wicket-contrib-dojo sample from sourceforge svn. You can checkout src 
from the repo. Your contributions are welcome

--
Vincent


Eelco Hillenius a écrit :
 It is actually pretty easy to build with Wicket if you want. Like Igor
 said, there is a project for this in wicket-stuff, but as the
 javascript project died and I (who set up the project) don't want to
 support it much as I never actually used it for anything real. Imo
 Ajax is a lot more powerful.

 However, contributions are more than welcome, and you could try to
 rally to get a few people working on this in the form of a
 wicket-stuff project.

 Eelco


 On 1/23/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Tapestry does a very good job with client-side form validation. Perhaps
 there is code in the Tapestry repository that could be using in Wicket?

 BTW, these are the things that I like about form validation in Tapestry 4.1
 1)  client-side form validation
 2)  CSS class for invalid fields  fieldInvalid
 3)  CSS class for missing fields:  fieldMissing

 Sean



 On 1/23/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 no, wicket doesnt provide this out of the box.

 there have been some attempts to provide such functionality, i think there
   
 was a project that integrated fvalidate js lib with wicket in wicket-stuff
 somewhere.
 
 -igor


   
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



 

 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
   


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

But i was talking about the settings maxpageversions.
thats not the same thing as how many there can be in the pagemap
That depends on the page map that is used (in 1.3 or 2.0)
AccessStackPageMap uses by default 5 because that is EvictionStrategy:

private IPageMapEvictionStrategy pageMapEvictionStrategy = new
LeastRecentlyAccessedEvictionStrategy(5);

The PageMap of the secondlevelcache only has one active in the session.

But you are making an app where all the urls are again bookmarkable and you
don't use forms anywhere?
or if you use for (with wicket 1.2) you handle the post in the constructor
of the page itself?
Thats not really where wicket is made for, your throw away pretty much 90%
of what makes wicket.

johan

On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I think the current method name makes sense, but what is unclear is
whether
the CURRENT page is taking up one of the positions. I would think setting
the max to 1 would ensure that the pagemap contains the current page and
no
others. If in fact the current page doesn't need room in the page map,
then
I guess 0 would make more sense. I think adding detail to the javadoc
should
be sufficient to clear up this ambiguity.

Johan Compagner wrote:

set the max to 0 then the change list of the version manager will really
not
ntain anything

this is the test: (after the new one is added to the list)

// If stack is overfull, remove oldest entry
if (getVersions() maxVersions)
{
expireOldestVersion();
}

What is logical? max versions is that also counting the current one?
What is the best English for this??
should we better express it like: setMaxPageUndoBuffer() ??

johan

On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Eelco Hillenius wrote:

How can I instruct Wicket not to maintain the multiple versions of a
given
page within the session? I've tried the following but when I dump the
session contents I still see multiple page versions:

getSessionSettings().setMaxPageMaps(1);
getPageSettings().setMaxPageVersions(1);

Am I missing the boat on this entirely?

-Jason
--
View this message in context:

http://www.nabble.com/Strategy-to-avoid-new-instances-of-pages-and-panels-tf2566413.html#a8553452
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Strategy-to-avoid-new-instances-of-pages-and-panels-tf2566413.html#a8570594
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Wicket-user] Tracking session expire exception


On 1/24/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Ok, I got news about the first page expired problem.  Problems with page
map that I said before and in the JIRA issue are still there, but the page
expire is gone.  Here is why :
In the pop up, I created a bookmarkable page link like this :

String parentPageMap = wicket:default;
if(pp !=
null)
{
parentPageMap = (String)pp.get (parent_page_map);
}
Class
 pageClass = SomePage.class;
BookmarkablePageLink bpl = new BookmarkablePageLink(link, pageClass);
bpl.setPageMap (PageMap.forName (parentPageMap));

bpl.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(target, parentPageMap));
add(bpl);

The problem with this, it is that it create a new page map.  So, because
there is a new pagemap, the session expire when I try to access things from
the session.



i am lost with that last sentence,  what do you mean with this? When does
the session expire?

and what is this code:

if(pp !=
null)
{
   parentPageMap = (String)pp.get (parent_page_map);
}

johan
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Tracking session expire exception


pp refer to page parameters that I get in the pop up

Here is the context :
The bookmarkable page link will be open in the window that open the pop up.

This code is in the pop-up.
The problem is when I have done that :

bpl.setPageMap (PageMap.forName (parentPageMap));

It will create a new page map wicket:default.  This will lead the main
window to reload correctly with the correct page class, but it will be
linked with the new page map named : wicket:default.

So, the correct way of doing this, it is that when the pagemap name is null,
fetch the pagemap using null, but window.name value will be wicket:default,
so, we have to set the target value to something else than the pagemap name
which is null.

It is hard to explain the why of that, but that is the problem I got.  Sorry
for being unclear.

Marc

On 1/24/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




On 1/24/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ok, I got news about the first page expired problem.  Problems with page
 map that I said before and in the JIRA issue are still there, but the page
 expire is gone.  Here is why :
 In the pop up, I created a bookmarkable page link like this :

 String parentPageMap = wicket:default;
 if(pp !=
 null)
 {
 parentPageMap = (String)pp.get (parent_page_map
 );
 }
 Class
  pageClass = SomePage.class;
 BookmarkablePageLink bpl = new BookmarkablePageLink(link, pageClass);
 bpl.setPageMap (PageMap.forName (parentPageMap));

 bpl.add(new
  SimpleAttributeModifier(target, parentPageMap));
 add(bpl);

 The problem with this, it is that it create a new page map.  So, because
 there is a new pagemap, the session expire when I try to access things from
 the session.


i am lost with that last sentence,  what do you mean with this? When does
the session expire?

and what is this code:

if(pp !=
null)
{
parentPageMap = (
String)pp.get (parent_page_map);
}

johan



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

Sorry, guess I misunderstood. Still trying to wrap my head around these
concepts.

We have an app that is all bookmarkable pages so far, but we may encounter
cases without them further down the road.

But even for our bookmarkable pages, they may have lots of activity on them
which is ajax actions which update the model behind the scenes. The way
wicket wires components to their models is still very beneficial, as is the
markup inheritance and java-centric development model, etc.

As an example, we currently have a search results page which must always
include all search criteria in the URL. So right now we have multiple panels
with various search criteria. When the user updates the form elements and
clicks search, we let wicket update all the backing models for us, then we
assemble a new URL based on the updated models, and redirect to the new URL.

This is instead of what might be a more familiar web model where the form
data is simply submitted TO the new URL -- instead, we are submitting to
wicket, letting wicket do all the updates to our backing state, and then we
just construct a new URL to represent the new criteria and redirect to it.

I won't deny that this is a bit wacky, but it was the only way I could find
to ensure that my search criteria are included in the URL, but we still get
wicket's free behavior of updating all model data. The trick is that we are
abandoning the updated model data and redirecting to a new page...

Not sure how well I've explained this. If there was a way to get wicket to
simply use bookmarkable URLs when it does the form submission, I'd be happy
to fall back on wicket.

Also, FYI, we are using a lot of the Wicket ajax behavior for updating state
which does NOT need to be in the URL.

-Jason

Johan Compagner wrote:

private IPageMapEvictionStrategy pageMapEvictionStrategy = new
LeastRecentlyAccessedEvictionStrategy(5);

The PageMap of the secondlevelcache only has one active in the session.

But you are making an app where all the urls are again bookmarkable and
you
don't use forms anywhere?
or if you use for (with wicket 1.2) you handle the post in the constructor
of the page itself?
Thats not really where wicket is made for, your throw away pretty much 90%
of what makes wicket.

johan

On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I think the current method name makes sense, but what is unclear is
whether
the CURRENT page is taking up one of the positions. I would think setting
the max to 1 would ensure that the pagemap contains the current page and
no
others. If in fact the current page doesn't need room in the page map,
then
I guess 0 would make more sense. I think adding detail to the javadoc
should
be sufficient to clear up this ambiguity.

Johan Compagner wrote:

set the max to 0 then the change list of the version manager will
really
not
ntain anything

this is the test: (after the new one is added to the list)

// If stack is overfull, remove oldest entry
if (getVersions() maxVersions)
{
expireOldestVersion();
}

What is logical? max versions is that also counting the current one?
What is the best English for this??
should we better express it like: setMaxPageUndoBuffer() ??

johan

On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Eelco Hillenius wrote:

Well, every user (session) will use memory, correct. But only to a
certain limit. Wicket 1.2 holds a couple of page/ versions in a
session, and Wicket 2.0 by default only holds the current one. So
the
creation of a fresh instance (e.g. a bookmarkable page) will replace
another one. Hence, how much memory you'll need is a simple function
of the number of concurrent sessions times the size of your session
and page(s) in it.

How can I instruct Wicket not to maintain the multiple versions of a
given
page within the session? I've tried the following but when I dump the
session contents I still see multiple page versions:

getSessionSettings().setMaxPageMaps(1);
getPageSettings().setMaxPageVersions(1);

Am I missing the boat on this entirely?

-Jason
--
View this message in context:

http://www.nabble.com/Strategy-to-avoid-new-instances-of-pages-and-panels-tf2566413.html#a8553452
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

[Wicket-user] Images problem

2007-01-24 Thread Predrag Spasojevic


Hi all,

I'm developing a web application which basically shows lots of pictures.
Pictures are stored in a database. I want that the same picture always has
the same value of the src attribute no matter where it is displayed.  As I
understand it is possible only if the image resource is shared. In other
words when using setImageResoruceReference the src attribute is always the
same for the same resource but when using setImageResource src attribute
depends on the current location of the image component.

Problem with shared resources is that they are cached. Wicket keeps all
shared resources in the SharedResources class No matter how light I make my
DynamicImageResource subclass I really don't won't to have thousands of
those objects in the cache.

Does anyone have any idea how to solve this problem?

--
Regards,
Predrag Spasojevic
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

Ahh so you are using pages with state. (you use ajax)
You just don't want to version them? Because for navigation you only use
bookmarkable pages

Just have one base page that does serVersioned(false)
then all your pages are unversioned.

johan

On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Sorry, guess I misunderstood. Still trying to wrap my head around these
concepts.

We have an app that is all bookmarkable pages so far, but we may encounter
cases without them further down the road.

But even for our bookmarkable pages, they may have lots of activity on
them
which is ajax actions which update the model behind the scenes. The way
wicket wires components to their models is still very beneficial, as is
the
markup inheritance and java-centric development model, etc.

As an example, we currently have a search results page which must always
include all search criteria in the URL. So right now we have multiple
panels
with various search criteria. When the user updates the form elements and
clicks search, we let wicket update all the backing models for us, then
we
assemble a new URL based on the updated models, and redirect to the new
URL.

This is instead of what might be a more familiar web model where the form
data is simply submitted TO the new URL -- instead, we are submitting to
wicket, letting wicket do all the updates to our backing state, and then
we
just construct a new URL to represent the new criteria and redirect to it.

I won't deny that this is a bit wacky, but it was the only way I could
find
to ensure that my search criteria are included in the URL, but we still
get
wicket's free behavior of updating all model data. The trick is that we
are
abandoning the updated model data and redirecting to a new page...

Not sure how well I've explained this. If there was a way to get wicket to
simply use bookmarkable URLs when it does the form submission, I'd be
happy
to fall back on wicket.

Also, FYI, we are using a lot of the Wicket ajax behavior for updating
state
which does NOT need to be in the URL.

-Jason

Johan Compagner wrote:

private IPageMapEvictionStrategy pageMapEvictionStrategy = new
LeastRecentlyAccessedEvictionStrategy(5);

The PageMap of the secondlevelcache only has one active in the session.

But you are making an app where all the urls are again bookmarkable and
you
don't use forms anywhere?
or if you use for (with wicket 1.2) you handle the post in the
constructor
of the page itself?
Thats not really where wicket is made for, your throw away pretty much
90%
of what makes wicket.

johan

On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I think the current method name makes sense, but what is unclear is
whether
the CURRENT page is taking up one of the positions. I would think
setting
the max to 1 would ensure that the pagemap contains the current page
and
no
others. If in fact the current page doesn't need room in the page map,
then
I guess 0 would make more sense. I think adding detail to the javadoc
should
be sufficient to clear up this ambiguity.

Johan Compagner wrote:

set the max to 0 then the change list of the version manager will
really
not
ntain anything

this is the test: (after the new one is added to the list)

// If stack is overfull, remove oldest entry
if (getVersions() maxVersions)
{
expireOldestVersion();
}

What is logical? max versions is that also counting the current one?
What is the best English for this??
should we better express it like: setMaxPageUndoBuffer() ??

johan

On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Eelco Hillenius wrote:

Well, every user (session) will use memory, correct. But only to a
certain limit. Wicket 1.2 holds a couple of page/ versions in a
session, and Wicket 2.0 by default only holds the current one. So
the
creation of a fresh instance (e.g. a bookmarkable page) will
replace
another one. Hence, how much memory you'll need is a simple
function
of the number of concurrent sessions times the size of your
session
and page(s) in it.

How can I instruct Wicket not to maintain the multiple versions of a
given
page within the session? I've tried the following but when I dump
the
session contents I still see multiple page versions:

getSessionSettings().setMaxPageMaps(1);
getPageSettings().setMaxPageVersions(1);

Am I missing the boat on this entirely?

-Jason
--
View this message in context:

http://www.nabble.com/Strategy-to-avoid-new-instances-of-pages-and-panels-tf2566413.html#a8553452
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Wicket-user] Tracking session expire exception


Why not do it a bit more reliable?

for example when you go back use a piece of javascript:

window.opener.location.href = bookmarkable url

or get the window name from the window.opener.name?
(in the popup or when you open the popup)
and use that as the target.

The only problem that could be is that the pagemap name of the generated
bookmarkable url
must use the pagemap of the opener page, instead of the current popup page.
Then it should work fine.

johan


On 1/24/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


pp refer to page parameters that I get in the pop up

Here is the context :
The bookmarkable page link will be open in the window that open the pop
up.
This code is in the pop-up.
The problem is when I have done that :

bpl.setPageMap (PageMap.forName (parentPageMap));

It will create a new page map wicket:default.  This will lead the main
window to reload correctly with the correct page class, but it will be
linked with the new page map named : wicket:default.

So, the correct way of doing this, it is that when the pagemap name is
null, fetch the pagemap using null, but window.name value will be
wicket:default, so, we have to set the target value to something else than
the pagemap name which is null.

It is hard to explain the why of that, but that is the problem I got.
Sorry for being unclear.

Marc

On 1/24/07, Johan Compagner  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 On 1/24/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Ok, I got news about the first page expired problem.  Problems with
  page map that I said before and in the JIRA issue are still there, but the
  page expire is gone.  Here is why :
  In the pop up, I created a bookmarkable page link like this :
 
  String parentPageMap = wicket:default;
  if(pp !=
  null)
  {
  parentPageMap = (String)pp.get (parent_page_map
 
  );
  }
  Class
   pageClass = SomePage.class;
  BookmarkablePageLink bpl = new BookmarkablePageLink(link, pageClass);
  bpl.setPageMap (PageMap.forName (parentPageMap));
 
  bpl.add(new
 
   SimpleAttributeModifier(target, parentPageMap));
  add(bpl);
 
  The problem with this, it is that it create a new page map.  So,
  because there is a new pagemap, the session expire when I try to access
  things from the session.


 i am lost with that last sentence,  what do you mean with this? When
 does the session expire?

 and what is this code:

 if(pp !=
 null
 )
 {
 parentPageMap = (
 String)pp.get (parent_page_map);
 }

 johan




 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Images problem


create a single dynamicimageresource that can load different images based on
the id passed in from the url

then you just do urlfor(myresource)+id=+id; to build the url

there is an article on the wiki that shows how to do this

-igor


On 1/24/07, Predrag Spasojevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi all,

I'm developing a web application which basically shows lots of pictures.
Pictures are stored in a database. I want that the same picture always has
the same value of the src attribute no matter where it is displayed.  As I
understand it is possible only if the image resource is shared. In other
words when using setImageResoruceReference the src attribute is always the
same for the same resource but when using setImageResource src attribute
depends on the current location of the image component.

Problem with shared resources is that they are cached. Wicket keeps all
shared resources in the SharedResources class No matter how light I make my
DynamicImageResource subclass I really don't won't to have thousands of
those objects in the cache.

Does anyone have any idea how to solve this problem?

--
Regards,
Predrag Spasojevic
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels


ajax requests shouldnt create versions anyways! did you fix that in 2.0 yet?

-igor


On 1/24/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Ahh so you are using pages with state. (you use ajax)
You just don't want to version them? Because for navigation you only use
bookmarkable pages

Just have one base page that does serVersioned(false)
then all your pages are unversioned.

johan


On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Sorry, guess I misunderstood. Still trying to wrap my head around these
 concepts.

 We have an app that is all bookmarkable pages so far, but we may
 encounter
 cases without them further down the road.

 But even for our bookmarkable pages, they may have lots of activity on
 them
 which is ajax actions which update the model behind the scenes. The way
 wicket wires components to their models is still very beneficial, as is
 the
 markup inheritance and java-centric development model, etc.

 As an example, we currently have a search results page which must always
 include all search criteria in the URL. So right now we have multiple
 panels
 with various search criteria. When the user updates the form elements
 and
 clicks search, we let wicket update all the backing models for us,
 then we
 assemble a new URL based on the updated models, and redirect to the new
 URL.

 This is instead of what might be a more familiar web model where the
 form
 data is simply submitted TO the new URL -- instead, we are submitting to
 wicket, letting wicket do all the updates to our backing state, and then
 we
 just construct a new URL to represent the new criteria and redirect to
 it.

 I won't deny that this is a bit wacky, but it was the only way I could
 find
 to ensure that my search criteria are included in the URL, but we still
 get
 wicket's free behavior of updating all model data. The trick is that we
 are
 abandoning the updated model data and redirecting to a new page...

 Not sure how well I've explained this. If there was a way to get wicket
 to
 simply use bookmarkable URLs when it does the form submission, I'd be
 happy
 to fall back on wicket.

 Also, FYI, we are using a lot of the Wicket ajax behavior for updating
 state
 which does NOT need to be in the URL.

 -Jason


 Johan Compagner wrote:
 
  But i was talking about the settings maxpageversions.
  thats not the same thing as how many there can be in the pagemap
  That depends on the page map that is used (in 1.3 or 2.0)
  AccessStackPageMap uses by default 5 because that is EvictionStrategy:
 
  private IPageMapEvictionStrategy pageMapEvictionStrategy = new
  LeastRecentlyAccessedEvictionStrategy(5);
 
  The PageMap of the secondlevelcache only has one active in the
 session.
 
  But you are making an app where all the urls are again bookmarkable
 and
  you
  don't use forms anywhere?
  or if you use for (with wicket 1.2) you handle the post in the
 constructor
  of the page itself?
  Thats not really where wicket is made for, your throw away pretty much
 90%
  of what makes wicket.
 
  johan
 
 
 
  On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  I think the current method name makes sense, but what is unclear is
  whether
  the CURRENT page is taking up one of the positions. I would think
 setting
  the max to 1 would ensure that the pagemap contains the current page
 and
  no
  others. If in fact the current page doesn't need room in the page
 map,
  then
  I guess 0 would make more sense. I think adding detail to the javadoc
  should
  be sufficient to clear up this ambiguity.
 
 
  Johan Compagner wrote:
  
   set the max to 0 then the change list of the version manager will
  really
   not
   ntain anything
  
   this is the test: (after the new one is added to the list)
  
   // If stack is overfull, remove oldest entry
   if (getVersions()  maxVersions)
   {
   expireOldestVersion();
   }
  
   What is logical? max versions is that also counting the current
 one?
   What is the best English for this??
   should we better express it like: setMaxPageUndoBuffer() ??
  
   johan
  
  
   On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  
   Eelco Hillenius wrote:
   
Well, every user (session) will use memory, correct. But only to
 a
certain limit. Wicket 1.2 holds a couple of page/ versions in a
session, and Wicket 2.0 by default only holds the current one.
 So
  the
creation of a fresh instance (e.g. a bookmarkable page) will
 replace
another one. Hence, how much memory you'll need is a simple
 function
of the number of concurrent sessions times the size of your
 session
and page(s) in it.
   
  
   How can I instruct Wicket not to maintain the multiple versions of
 a
   given
   page within the session? I've tried the following but when I dump
 the
   session contents I still see multiple page versions:
  
   getSessionSettings().setMaxPageMaps(1);
   getPageSettings().setMaxPageVersions(1);
  
   Am I missing the boat on

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels


Did not know about that functionality. Sounds perfect. Then for pages which
must always have bookmarkable URL, we can always extend a base class that
sets itself to unversioned, and for other non-bookmarkable pages we can
still rely on the standard behavior with back button support.

Thanks!

-Jason


Johan Compagner wrote:
 
 Ahh so you are using pages with state. (you use ajax)
 You just don't want to version them? Because for navigation you only use
 bookmarkable pages
 
 Just have one base page that does serVersioned(false)
 then all your pages are unversioned.
 
 johan
 
 
 On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Sorry, guess I misunderstood. Still trying to wrap my head around these
 concepts.

 We have an app that is all bookmarkable pages so far, but we may
 encounter
 cases without them further down the road.

 But even for our bookmarkable pages, they may have lots of activity on
 them
 which is ajax actions which update the model behind the scenes. The way
 wicket wires components to their models is still very beneficial, as is
 the
 markup inheritance and java-centric development model, etc.

 As an example, we currently have a search results page which must always
 include all search criteria in the URL. So right now we have multiple
 panels
 with various search criteria. When the user updates the form elements and
 clicks search, we let wicket update all the backing models for us, then
 we
 assemble a new URL based on the updated models, and redirect to the new
 URL.

 This is instead of what might be a more familiar web model where the form
 data is simply submitted TO the new URL -- instead, we are submitting to
 wicket, letting wicket do all the updates to our backing state, and then
 we
 just construct a new URL to represent the new criteria and redirect to
 it.

 I won't deny that this is a bit wacky, but it was the only way I could
 find
 to ensure that my search criteria are included in the URL, but we still
 get
 wicket's free behavior of updating all model data. The trick is that we
 are
 abandoning the updated model data and redirecting to a new page...

 Not sure how well I've explained this. If there was a way to get wicket
 to
 simply use bookmarkable URLs when it does the form submission, I'd be
 happy
 to fall back on wicket.

 Also, FYI, we are using a lot of the Wicket ajax behavior for updating
 state
 which does NOT need to be in the URL.

 -Jason


 Johan Compagner wrote:
 
  But i was talking about the settings maxpageversions.
  thats not the same thing as how many there can be in the pagemap
  That depends on the page map that is used (in 1.3 or 2.0)
  AccessStackPageMap uses by default 5 because that is EvictionStrategy:
 
  private IPageMapEvictionStrategy pageMapEvictionStrategy = new
  LeastRecentlyAccessedEvictionStrategy(5);
 
  The PageMap of the secondlevelcache only has one active in the session.
 
  But you are making an app where all the urls are again bookmarkable and
  you
  don't use forms anywhere?
  or if you use for (with wicket 1.2) you handle the post in the
 constructor
  of the page itself?
  Thats not really where wicket is made for, your throw away pretty much
 90%
  of what makes wicket.
 
  johan
 
 
 
  On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  I think the current method name makes sense, but what is unclear is
  whether
  the CURRENT page is taking up one of the positions. I would think
 setting
  the max to 1 would ensure that the pagemap contains the current page
 and
  no
  others. If in fact the current page doesn't need room in the page map,
  then
  I guess 0 would make more sense. I think adding detail to the javadoc
  should
  be sufficient to clear up this ambiguity.
 
 
  Johan Compagner wrote:
  
   set the max to 0 then the change list of the version manager will
  really
   not
   ntain anything
  
   this is the test: (after the new one is added to the list)
  
   // If stack is overfull, remove oldest entry
   if (getVersions()  maxVersions)
   {
   expireOldestVersion();
   }
  
   What is logical? max versions is that also counting the current one?
   What is the best English for this??
   should we better express it like: setMaxPageUndoBuffer() ??
  
   johan
  
  
   On 1/24/07, dukejansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  
   Eelco Hillenius wrote:
   
Well, every user (session) will use memory, correct. But only to
 a
certain limit. Wicket 1.2 holds a couple of page/ versions in a
session, and Wicket 2.0 by default only holds the current one. So
  the
creation of a fresh instance (e.g. a bookmarkable page) will
 replace
another one. Hence, how much memory you'll need is a simple
 function
of the number of concurrent sessions times the size of your
 session
and page(s) in it.
   
  
   How can I instruct Wicket not to maintain the multiple versions of
 a
   given
   page within the session? I've tried the following but when I

[Wicket-user] flourish right-wing

2007-01-24 Thread limb


If you plan on using this content for any purpose, you should review this 
disclaimer and copyright notice. Kirwan were on holiday in England when she 
died but according to family members, They were never called to properly 
identify the body but did admit, a close family friend did identify the body.
Mutual Fund FAQsHaving run the About. One of the family members is grabbed by 
an alien, and the family fights back, shooting at the invaders. If you could 
really just up and drop a half day of work with I'm Cutting Down My Stress 
Level as the reason anytime you wanted, chances are, most would.
It was dark outside and a little cloudy, smoke coming out of the industry.
Hopefully, he will find UFOs and film them. It was, if not relaxing, 
enlightening. They were arranged in a diamond shape.
I have the job responsibility of moving aircraft under there own power from 
gate to gate or the hangar complex for maintenance. Retired Pilot Snaps Photo 
of UFO Retired Air Force pilot Col.
Actually, I thought it was quite hilarious. AboutThis entry, Fantasy Sports 
Lawsuit Reply Brief, is part of the Tech Law Advisor weblog and was posted by  
in the Internet Regulation Category. Brokerages and funds  took the full brunt 
of regulatory attacks by former NY Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and the SEC 
since the laws were more clearly defined for those industries.
Latest UFO Sighting ReportsHey, everyone, we have a lot of good UFO reports to 
look over this week, so let's get started.
Today, Barsaatu, whose name translates to rain in Hindi, indulges in more than 
three servings of mud on a daily basis. There are a lot of statements in the 
Bible which hold metaphorical and figurative meanings.
They took a picture of it, and getting home and looking at the photos of the 
day, they saw something strange in the right hand corner. In the midst of these 
reports, there have also been several reports from Argentina where eyewitnesses 
have reported a number of UFOs, with one of the unknown objects believed to 
have crashed.
We could not hear any engine sound. It was a very bright orange, and soon, shot 
straight upward and was gone. Today, Barsaatu, whose name translates to rain in 
Hindi, indulges in more than three servings of mud on a daily basis.

publishing.gif
Description: GIF image
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] How do you load an external image?


When I use the above StaticImage Wicket looks for the image url in the path
of the relevant component like so:

com/vegas/cart/wicket/components/scroll/http:/cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg

Do I need to add a WebPageResourceStreamLocator or some such thing?  The
full log output is below.  Thank you as always.

1/24 15:02:14 WARN | PackageResource.getResourceStream(553): Unable to find
package resource [path =
com/vegas/cart/wicket/components/scroll/http:/cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg,
style = null, locale = en_US]
1/24 15:02:14 ERROR| AjaxRequestTarget.respond(379): Error while responding
to an AJAX request: [EMAIL PROTECTED] markupIdToComponent
[{scrollPopup=[MarkupContainer [Component id = scrollPopup, page =
com.vegas.cart.wicket.pages.Index, path = 7:scrollPopup.ModalWindow,
isVisible = true, isVersioned = false]]}], prependJavascript [[]],
appendJavascript [[var element = document.getElementById
(scrollPopup_content);
var settings = new Object();
settings.minWidth=200;
settings.minHeight=200;
settings.className=w_blue;
settings.width=800;
settings.height=400;
settings.resizable=true;
settings.element = element;
settings.cookieId=modal-window-18936477;
settings.title=Deathmatch Scrolling View;
settings.mask=semi-transparent;
settings.onClose = function() { var
wcall=wicketAjaxGet('/wicketapp/app?wicket:interface=:7:scrollPopup::IBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=1',
function() { }, function() { }); };
Wicket.Window.create(settings).show();
]]
wicket.protocol.http.servlet.AbortWithWebErrorCodeException
   at wicket.markup.html.PackageResource.getResourceStream(
PackageResource.java:556)
   at wicket.markup.html.PackageResource.init(PackageResource.java:502)
   at wicket.markup.html.PackageResource.get(PackageResource.java:424)
   at
wicket.markup.html.image.resource.LocalizedImageResource$1.newResource(
LocalizedImageResource.java:361)
   at wicket.ResourceReference.bind(ResourceReference.java:149)
   at wicket.markup.html.image.resource.LocalizedImageResource.bind(
LocalizedImageResource.java:180)
   at
wicket.markup.html.image.resource.LocalizedImageResource.loadStaticImage(
LocalizedImageResource.java:368)
   at
wicket.markup.html.image.resource.LocalizedImageResource.setSrcAttribute(
LocalizedImageResource.java:283)
   at wicket.markup.html.image.Image.onComponentTag(Image.java:225)
   at wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:1688)
   at wicket.markup.html.WebComponent.onRender(WebComponent.java:61)
   at wicket.Component.render(Component.java:1533)
   at wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1334)
   at wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java
:982)
   at wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java
:571)
   at wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:108)
   at wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:1719)
   at wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:927)
   at wicket.Component.render(Component.java:1533)
   at wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1334)
   at wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java
:982)
   at wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java
:571)
   at wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:108)
   at wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:1719)
   at wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:927)
   at wicket.Component.render(Component.java:1533)
   at wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:1657)
   at wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.respondComponent(AjaxRequestTarget.java
:474)
   at wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.respond(AjaxRequestTarget.java:361)
   at wicket.request.compound.DefaultResponseStrategy.respond(
DefaultResponseStrategy.java:49)
   at wicket.request.compound.AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.respond
(AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.java:66)
   at wicket.RequestCycle.doProcessEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:902)
   at wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:934)
   at wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1010)
   at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1084)
   at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:454)
   at wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.doGet(WicketServlet.java:219)
   at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:697)
   at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:810)
   at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(
ApplicationFilterChain.java:252)
   at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(
ApplicationFilterChain.java:173)
   at org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(
ReplyHeaderFilter.java:81)
   at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(
ApplicationFilterChain.java:202)
   at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(
ApplicationFilterChain.java:173)
   at

Re: [Wicket-user] How do you load an external image?

how are you creating the static image?

-igor


On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When I use the above StaticImage Wicket looks for the image url in the path
 of the relevant component like so:

 com/vegas/cart/wicket/components/scroll/http:/cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg

  Do I need to add a WebPageResourceStreamLocator or some such thing?  The
 full log output is below.  Thank you as always.

 1/24 15:02:14 WARN |
 PackageResource.getResourceStream(553): Unable to find
 package resource [path =
 com/vegas/cart/wicket/components/scroll/http:/cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg,
 style = null, locale = en_US]
 1/24 15:02:14 ERROR| AjaxRequestTarget.respond(379): Error while responding
 to an AJAX request: [EMAIL PROTECTED] markupIdToComponent
 [{scrollPopup=[MarkupContainer [Component id = scrollPopup, page =
 com.vegas.cart.wicket.pages.Index , path =
 7:scrollPopup.ModalWindow, isVisible = true, isVersioned = false]]}],
 prependJavascript [[]], appendJavascript [[var element =
 document.getElementById(scrollPopup_content);
 var settings = new Object();
 settings.minWidth=200;
 settings.minHeight=200;
 settings.className=w_blue;
 settings.width=800;
 settings.height=400;
 settings.resizable=true;
 settings.element = element;
 settings.cookieId=modal-window-18936477;
 settings.title=Deathmatch Scrolling View;
 settings.mask=semi-transparent;
 settings.onClose = function() { var
 wcall=wicketAjaxGet('/wicketapp/app?wicket:interface=:7:scrollPopup::IBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=1',
 function() { }, function() { }); };
 Wicket.Window.create(settings).show();
 ]]
 wicket.protocol.http.servlet.AbortWithWebErrorCodeException
 at
 wicket.markup.html.PackageResource.getResourceStream(PackageResource.java:556)
 at wicket.markup.html.PackageResource
 .init(PackageResource.java:502)
 at
 wicket.markup.html.PackageResource.get(PackageResource.java:424)
 at
 wicket.markup.html.image.resource.LocalizedImageResource$1.newResource(LocalizedImageResource.java
 :361)
 at wicket.ResourceReference.bind(ResourceReference.java:149)
 at
 wicket.markup.html.image.resource.LocalizedImageResource.bind(LocalizedImageResource.java:180)
 at
 wicket.markup.html.image.resource.LocalizedImageResource.loadStaticImage
 (LocalizedImageResource.java:368)
 at
 wicket.markup.html.image.resource.LocalizedImageResource.setSrcAttribute(LocalizedImageResource.java:283)
 at
 wicket.markup.html.image.Image.onComponentTag(Image.java:225)
 at
 wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:1688)
 at
 wicket.markup.html.WebComponent.onRender(WebComponent.java:61)
 at wicket.Component.render(Component.java:1533)
 at wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext
 (MarkupContainer.java:1334)
 at
 wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:982)
 at
 wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java:571)
 at wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody
 (Panel.java:108)
 at
 wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:1719)
 at wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:927)
 at wicket.Component.render(Component.java:1533)
 at wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext
 (MarkupContainer.java:1334)
 at
 wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:982)
 at
 wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java:571)
 at wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody
 (Panel.java:108)
 at
 wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:1719)
 at wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:927)
 at wicket.Component.render(Component.java:1533)
 at wicket.Component.renderComponent
 (Component.java:1657)
 at
 wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.respondComponent(AjaxRequestTarget.java:474)
 at
 wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.respond(AjaxRequestTarget.java:361)
 at
 wicket.request.compound.DefaultResponseStrategy.respond
 (DefaultResponseStrategy.java:49)
 at
 wicket.request.compound.AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.respond(AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.java:66)
 at
 wicket.RequestCycle.doProcessEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java
 :902)
 at
 wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:934)
 at wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1010)
 at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1084)
 at wicket.RequestCycle.request (RequestCycle.java:454)
 at
 wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.doGet(WicketServlet.java:219)
 at
 javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:697)
 at
 javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java
 :810)
 at
 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:252)
 at
 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173)
 at
 org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilter.java:81)

Re: [Wicket-user] error on the faq

2007-01-24 Thread Jonathan Locke



That is a typo, but you actually meant to say:

tr wicket:id=hideme

not:

tr wicket:id=wicket-hideme

because it's:

WebMarkupContainer hideme = new WebMarkupContainer(hideme);

not

WebMarkupContainer hideme = new WebMarkupContainer(wicket-hideme);


Scott Swank wrote:
 
 There is a typo in the faq -- which hit one our Wicket test driver
 developers.  The last FAQ How can I hide markup and/or components?
 should
 have
 
 tr wicket:id=wicket-hideme
 
 instead of
 
 tr id=wicket-hideme
 
 Also, there are CDATA tags wrapping each of the code examples.
 
 Cheers, Scott
 
 
 ![CDATA[
 WebMarkupContainer hideme = new WebMarkupContainer(hideme);
 hideme.setVisible(false);
 
 html
 body
   table
   tr id = wicket-hideme
   tdthis row will be hidden/td
   /tr
   tr
   tdthis row will not be hidden/td
   /tr
   /table
 /body
 /html
 ]]
 
 
 
 -- 
 Scott Swank
 reformed mathematician
 
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--error-on-the-faq-tf3083739.html#a8584536
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] How do you load an external image?


The image is added to the panel like so:

  add(new StaticImage(productImage, 
http://cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg;));

And that uses a convenience constructor I added to the original StaticImage:

package com.vegas.wicket;

import wicket.markup.ComponentTag;
import wicket.markup.html.WebComponent;
import wicket.model.IModel;
import wicket.model.Model;

public class StaticImage extends WebComponent
{
   private static final long serialVersionUID = -7600332611457262341L;

   public StaticImage(String id, IModel model)
   {
   super(id, model);
   }

   public StaticImage(String id, String url)
   {
   this(id, new Model(url));
   }

   protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag)
   {
   checkComponentTag(tag, img);
   tag.put(src, getModelObjectAsString());
   }
}
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] How do you load an external image?


And the html tag is simply:

  img wicket:id=productImage /

Thank you.

On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


The image is added to the panel like so:

   add(new StaticImage(productImage, 
http://cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg
));

And that uses a convenience constructor I added to the original
StaticImage:

package com.vegas.wicket;

import wicket.markup.ComponentTag;
import wicket.markup.html.WebComponent;
import wicket.model.IModel;
import wicket.model.Model;

public class StaticImage extends WebComponent
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = -7600332611457262341L;

public StaticImage(String id, IModel model)
{
super(id, model);
}

public StaticImage(String id, String url)
{
this(id, new Model(url));
}

protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag)
{
checkComponentTag(tag, img);
tag.put(src, getModelObjectAsString());
}
}





--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] error on the faq


Indeed.

On 1/24/07, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




That is a typo, but you actually meant to say:

tr wicket:id=hideme

not:

tr wicket:id=wicket-hideme

because it's:

WebMarkupContainer hideme = new WebMarkupContainer(hideme);

not

WebMarkupContainer hideme = new WebMarkupContainer(wicket-hideme);

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] How do you load an external image?


that is very peculiar, i dont see a reason for it to look for a packaged
resource, what does the produced markup look like?

-igor


On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


And the html tag is simply:

   img wicket:id=productImage /

Thank you.

On 1/24/07, Scott Swank  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The image is added to the panel like so:

add(new StaticImage(productImage,  
http://cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg
 ));

 And that uses a convenience constructor I added to the original
 StaticImage:

 package com.vegas.wicket;

 import wicket.markup.ComponentTag;
 import wicket.markup.html.WebComponent;
 import wicket.model.IModel;
 import wicket.model.Model;

 public class StaticImage extends WebComponent
 {
 private static final long serialVersionUID = -7600332611457262341L;

 public StaticImage(String id, IModel model)
 {
 super(id, model);
 }

 public StaticImage(String id, String url)
 {
 this(id, new Model(url));
 }

 protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag)
 {
 checkComponentTag(tag, img);
 tag.put(src, getModelObjectAsString());
 }
 }




--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] How do you load an external image?


We have added a new ResourceStreamLocator to let us put html files off in a
separate directory for our UI team.  From our WebApplication:

 protected void init() {
 super.init();
 CompoundResourceStreamLocator locator =

(CompoundResourceStreamLocator)getResourceSettings().getResourceStreamLocator();
WebApplicationPath resourceFinder = (WebApplicationPath)
getResourceSettings().getResourceFinder();
resourceFinder.add(/dev/uiproto/wicketapp/content); //this path
should be changed
resourceFinder.add(/dev/workspace/wicketapp/content); //this path
should be changed

locator.add(0, new WebPageResourceStreamLocator(resourceFinder));
 }

Is that potentially the culprit?

On 1/24/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


that is very peculiar, i dont see a reason for it to look for a packaged
resource, what does the produced markup look like?

-igor


On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 And the html tag is simply:

img wicket:id=productImage /

 Thank you.

 On 1/24/07, Scott Swank  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The image is added to the panel like so:
 
 add(new StaticImage(productImage,  
http://cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg
  ));
 
  And that uses a convenience constructor I added to the original
  StaticImage:
 
  package com.vegas.wicket;
 
  import wicket.markup.ComponentTag;
  import wicket.markup.html.WebComponent;
  import wicket.model.IModel;
  import wicket.model.Model;
 
  public class StaticImage extends WebComponent
  {
  private static final long serialVersionUID =
  -7600332611457262341L;
 
  public StaticImage(String id, IModel model)
  {
  super(id, model);
  }
 
  public StaticImage(String id, String url)
  {
  this(id, new Model(url));
  }
 
  protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag)
  {
  checkComponentTag(tag, img);
  tag.put(src, getModelObjectAsString());
  }
  }




 --
 Scott Swank
 reformed mathematician

 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user






--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] How do you load an external image?


No markup is produced.  It's in a ModalWindow.  Here's the dump from the
Ajax debug window:

*INFO: *
Initiating Ajax GET request on
/wicketapp/app?wicket:interface=:1:openScroll::IBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0random=
0.46680841416499696
*INFO: *Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
*ERROR: *Received Ajax response with code: 500
*INFO: *Invoking post-call handler(s)...
*INFO: *Invoking failure handler(s)...


On 1/24/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


that is very peculiar, i dont see a reason for it to look for a packaged
resource, what does the produced markup look like?

-igor


On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 And the html tag is simply:

img wicket:id=productImage /

 Thank you.

 On 1/24/07, Scott Swank  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The image is added to the panel like so:
 
 add(new StaticImage(productImage,  
http://cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg
  ));
 
  And that uses a convenience constructor I added to the original
  StaticImage:
 
  package com.vegas.wicket;
 
  import wicket.markup.ComponentTag;
  import wicket.markup.html.WebComponent;
  import wicket.model.IModel;
  import wicket.model.Model;
 
  public class StaticImage extends WebComponent
  {
  private static final long serialVersionUID =
  -7600332611457262341L;
 
  public StaticImage(String id, IModel model)
  {
  super(id, model);
  }
 
  public StaticImage(String id, String url)
  {
  this(id, new Model(url));
  }
 
  protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag)
  {
  checkComponentTag(tag, img);
  tag.put(src, getModelObjectAsString());
  }
  }




 --
 Scott Swank
 reformed mathematician

 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user






--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] How do you load an external image?

i have no idea why you would have that weird stuff in the src
attribute, its not in the model.

-igor


On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 No markup is produced.  It's in a ModalWindow.  Here's the dump from the
 Ajax debug window:

 INFO: Initiating Ajax GET request on
 /wicketapp/app?wicket:interface=:1:openScroll::IBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0random=0.46680841416499696
 INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
 ERROR: Received Ajax response with code: 500
 INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)...
 INFO: Invoking failure handler(s)...

 On 1/24/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
  that is very peculiar, i dont see a reason for it to look for a packaged
 resource, what does the produced markup look like?
 
  -igor
 
 
 
 
  On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   And the html tag is simply:
  
  img wicket:id=productImage /
  
   Thank you.
  
  
   On 1/24/07, Scott Swank  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
The image is added to the panel like so:
   
   add(new StaticImage(productImage, 
 http://cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg
 ));
   
And that uses a convenience constructor I added to the original
 StaticImage:
   
package com.vegas.wicket;
   
import wicket.markup.ComponentTag;
import wicket.markup.html.WebComponent;
import wicket.model.IModel;
import wicket.model.Model;
   
public class StaticImage extends WebComponent
{
private static final long serialVersionUID =
 -7600332611457262341L;
   
public StaticImage(String id, IModel model)
{
super(id, model);
}
   
public StaticImage(String id, String url)
{
this(id, new Model(url));
}
   
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag)
{
checkComponentTag(tag, img);
tag.put(src, getModelObjectAsString());
}
}
  
  
  
   --
   Scott Swank
   reformed mathematician
  
 -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
  
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 



 --
 Scott Swank
 reformed mathematician
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] How do you load an external image?

ah, so the image doesnt even render, i see. i thought that url you
showed was in the image's src. so this thread doesnt have anything to
do with the staticimage component itself???

-igor


On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 No markup is produced.  It's in a ModalWindow.  Here's the dump from the
 Ajax debug window:

 INFO: Initiating Ajax GET request on
 /wicketapp/app?wicket:interface=:1:openScroll::IBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0random=0.46680841416499696
 INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
 ERROR: Received Ajax response with code: 500
 INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)...
 INFO: Invoking failure handler(s)...

 On 1/24/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
  that is very peculiar, i dont see a reason for it to look for a packaged
 resource, what does the produced markup look like?
 
  -igor
 
 
 
 
  On 1/24/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   And the html tag is simply:
  
  img wicket:id=productImage /
  
   Thank you.
  
  
   On 1/24/07, Scott Swank  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
The image is added to the panel like so:
   
   add(new StaticImage(productImage, 
 http://cache.vegas.com/resorts/thehotel/mandalaybaynew.jpg
 ));
   
And that uses a convenience constructor I added to the original
 StaticImage:
   
package com.vegas.wicket;
   
import wicket.markup.ComponentTag;
import wicket.markup.html.WebComponent;
import wicket.model.IModel;
import wicket.model.Model;
   
public class StaticImage extends WebComponent
{
private static final long serialVersionUID =
 -7600332611457262341L;
   
public StaticImage(String id, IModel model)
{
super(id, model);
}
   
public StaticImage(String id, String url)
{
this(id, new Model(url));
}
   
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag)
{
checkComponentTag(tag, img);
tag.put(src, getModelObjectAsString());
}
}
  
  
  
   --
   Scott Swank
   reformed mathematician
  
 -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
  
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 



 --
 Scott Swank
 reformed mathematician
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head with page

2007-01-24 Thread Otan


Oops! Let me correct my previous post. Based on the new Wiki, wicket:head is
not necessary for a child markup if it is a page; the html head is enough
to be contributed to the final head of the markup.

On 25/01/07, Otan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


The following works for me:

!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd 
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xmlns:wicket=
http://www.wicketframework.org;
head
title~/title
wicket:head
script language=javascript type=text/javascript
alert(' Content of the wicket:head gets contributed into
the final page.');
/script
/wicket:head
/head
body
wicket:extend
This is a child markup and here is its content. Notice that I
have a wicket:head above.
/wicket:extend
/body
/html



On 25/01/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

 In the wiki, there is a gotcha that look like this :
 Adding wicket:head to a Page

 wicket:head is intended for panels and borders only. Do not add this
 to a page.

 The problem is : it is exactly what I wanted to do.  I got a child class
 that need to add some css/javascript to the header of the page.  Is it
 because our design is too pour or just that this is not true anymore or what
 else?  I wanted to have a little more detailed about that.

 Thanks

 Marc

 P.S. : I'll make sure to copy the details into the wiki after :)



 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] where's wicket stuff gmap


Is the gmap component gone, or temporarily unavailable?

Thank you,
Scott

--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] where's wicket stuff gmap