Hi.
This is my 3rd day with Wicket. I really like Wicket so far.
I am looking through the docs and examples and their source,
but came to a couple of questions.
I want to know how the code will look like if I applied Wicket to
one of my web apps. I have a domain model with lots of objects,
too
On 2/11/07, Natto Lover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My questions are:
(1) Can I create URLs without instantiating the page objects?
wicket has bookmarkable pages ( a page that has a default constructor or
page(PageParameters) constructor ). you can create a url for this page
without creating
huh?
Why is 2.0 not on apache yet?
johan
On 2/9/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.0 and 1.2.x are here
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/wicket/
just not in org/apache/wicket yet
-igor
On 2/9/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i can't wait for 2.0 snapshots! =)
Because I (we) haven't fixed the pom's yet.
Martijn
On 2/11/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
huh?
Why is 2.0 not on apache yet?
johan
On 2/9/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.0 and 1.2.x are here
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/wicket/
just not
Thanks a lot! I'll try what you explained.
Let me clarify the last part of my question.
If so, how can I avoid creating duplicate instances for the same
domain object when the user clicks the link for the same instance
for multiple times?
not sure what you mean by duplicate instances
Hi all,
Is there a possibility to render a Wicket page to a file instead to the browser?
In fact, i need to make an 'HTML offline export' of all products stored in
database... how would you do to accomplish this, including stylesheets and
images?
(i already tried wget but I'm having problems
well yes, there will be two pages pointing to the same dir, but wicket uses
an LRU map to keep only X number of them in session. so eventually it will
go away, you dont need to worry about it
-igor
On 2/11/07, Natto Lover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a lot! I'll try what you explained.
After switching from 1.2.4 to 1.2.5, I am seeing a lot of JavaScript errors
Object expected on
AjaxFallbackLink links.
In development mode I also found that the WICKET AJAX DEBUG is often
missing after using
a AJAX link followed by a link to a bookmarkable/mounted page.
Looking a the html
Hi all,
Fragments allow to do selections in page's content, but I find this way too
complicated to accomplish a simple if statement:
I have a form. Inside it, an upload field, for images. Besides it, a little
image preview and a delete link. I would like to easily switch between preview
+
Why not use setVisible() on the components? Or subclass and override
isVisible()?
Martijn
On 2/11/07, Francisco Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Fragments allow to do selections in page's content, but I find this way too
complicated to accomplish a simple if statement:
I have a form.
does wget keep the cookie for session tracking?
-igor
On 2/11/07, Francisco Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a possibility to render a Wicket page to a file instead to the
browser?
In fact, i need to make an 'HTML offline export' of all products stored in
database... how
I am trying to develop with Wicket in IntelliJ. Whenever I do a
hotswap on some code changes, it seems like IntelliJ / Tomcat
automatically redeploys the application and I get a 'Page Expired'
error.
Is there any way for me to run the app in debugger mode, make changes
to methods,
we dont use any fancy launchers here, just this
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-examples/src/main/java/wicket/examples/StartExamples.java
debug that as a java application, include a jetty dependency and you are
ready to go.
-igor
On 2/11/07, Jesse
Well, yes. ADMIN and USER are just string constants of no particular
significance. You can use any strings you want without changing the source
code.
Matt Welch wrote:
I'm trying to use wicket-auth-roles for authentication and authorization,
but there are a few things I'm not quite
Well, yes(and I could certainly be making this harder than it really is) but
that doesn't seem to alleviate the issue with all of the classes in that use
the Roles class explicitly.
In any case, I took Igor's suggestion and used the great work in
wicket-auth-roles as a guide and created
it's been a long time since i worked on this code, so i don't recall the
details that well. if there are specific things we could do to make
wicket-auth-roles more reusable right out of the box, i think we should
consider them... please feel free to file an RFE if you have a specific idea
of
That must be the key to your success.
I talk about this off and on over at churchpundit.
CommentsPage: congratulations!
It's a wonderful, life-changing experience. Villa Rentals in Osceloa Florida
Disney Orlando Area 1st Choice - Grand Palms 3 bed condo 5 miles to Disney
Villa to rent Osceloa
i dont know if its worth doing this. the truth of the matter is that most
apps have very different authorization schemes. i think what you will end up
doing is creating something so generic it is convoluted, take a look at
acegi - they tried to do that. i think we are better off with a concise
yeah. i hear ya and i agree in general. but if there i something simple
and straightforward we could do to make the existing code more broadly
applicable or extensible somehow, why not at least put in an RFE to consider
it?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
i dont know if its worth doing this. the
19 matches
Mail list logo
