Just found out that this is only happening when im using
wicket-extensions (1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT)
On 4/22/07, Bjön Limell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im having this problem too
On 4/21/07, Peter Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just trying the latest 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT and I
You can use this workaround (if you're using widket-extensions):
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.wicket/groupId
artifactIdwicket-extensions/artifactId
version1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/version
exclusions
exclusion
I think a blog project which covers most common requirements will be fine.
About ORM, I prefer Hibernate.
// I have noticed your plan in Wicket Group of JavaEye. I'd like to take
part in this project, if you start pupa.
best,
Hailong Zhang
On 4/22/07, 王磊 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will
I will begin a open source project for wicket which name is pupa.
I hope it can be a best practice for wicket users.
Wicket1.3 is the best choice to write the project,becuase i think stateless
page is very important feature.
But wicket2.0 is too far to use.
So ,i need more advices about the
Hi,
I'm about to develop a new e-commerce site and having grown tired of other
frameworks I have tried, Wicket seems to bring forward a lot that I have
been missing and wanting to use.
However, I have never used a component-based framework and I have a few
questions that I hope someone can
why not use JPA? then you can back that by hibernate/toplink/whatever
-igor
On 4/22/07, Zhang Hailong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a blog project which covers most common requirements will be fine.
About ORM, I prefer Hibernate.
// I have noticed your plan in Wicket Group of JavaEye.
Because it lacks criteria queries? :)
-Matej
On 4/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why not use JPA? then you can back that by hibernate/toplink/whatever
-igor
On 4/22/07, Zhang Hailong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a blog project which covers most common requirements
Hi
On 4/22/07, Matthias Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm about to develop a new e-commerce site and having grown tired of other
frameworks I have tried, Wicket seems to bring forward a lot that I have
been missing and wanting to use.
However, I have never used a component-based
Hi Matthias,
For example, for the new site that I'm developing, the only information that
I can see is needed to be stored between requests in the session objects is
whether the user is logged in or not (and his/her user-id). For such a site,
is something like Wicket overkill in terms of
Hi all,
i'm trying to write a simple test to see if a page gets rendered. when i
run the test i'm getting error: NoClassDefFoundError for GenericServlet (see
below). it complains about the line where WicketTester gets instantiated.
i tried to specify absolute path to the .war file in the
Wicket 1.2.6 available
The Wicket team is proud to announce another maintenance release for
Wicket 1.2. With our first 1.3 release looming on the horizon, this
probably marks the last 1.2 release. This release contains numerous
fixes.
IMPORTANT NOTE
A critical bug has
yeah, i think all that stuff moved to examples due to
security concerns with that stuff being bookmarkable
and not protected by an authorization strategy.
Alexander Lohse wrote:
Hi,
I cannot find the LiveSessionsPage since I recently updated our
project to the lastest version of
i can confirm that. i have no idea what i meant by that comment. ;-)
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
On 2/28/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is an interesting comment indeed. if it was really true then
webpage.getmarkuptype() would be final. anyone else mind to comment?
Looks
I have a table which contains a list of users. At the end of each row there
is an delete/undo link. When the user clicks delete I want to hide the row
and replace it with only the undo link. What would be the best way to do
this? Thanks for your time.
view = new ListView(rows, data) {
Is the DatesComparatorValidator object something you wrote or is that
something coming
in wicket 1.3?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--ajax-libraries---wicket-tf3191437.html#a10129826
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I wonder what's the difference between Link and PageLink in the following
situation:
-use Link and in onClick() handler use setResponsePage(new MyPage(myParam));
-use PageLink and provide getPage() and getPageIdentity() functions and
inside getPage() return new MyPage(myParam);
--
View this
16 matches
Mail list logo