believe me, i know that. but hopefully the way i repsonded has cured at
least one person, no hard feelings :)
-igor
On 6/21/07, Ballist1c [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cool your jets mate... your never going to get rid of stupidity...
igor.vaynberg wrote:
maybe if you wouldve bothered
Yes. Markup inheritance is meant to go one-on-one with Java
inheritance which is limited to single parents. If people feel a
markup inheritance-like pattern would be useful, we could discuss it,
but it has to be a different kind of concept.
Eelco
On 6/21/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cure??? there is no cure... i promise you :D
igor.vaynberg wrote:
believe me, i know that. but hopefully the way i repsonded has cured at
least one person, no hard feelings :)
-igor
On 6/21/07, Ballist1c [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cool your jets mate... your never going to get
You could use the image map component (see the example in
org.apache.wicket.examples.linkomatic), but that would indeed result
in a lot of components for not that much gains.
I'm pretty sure that at least in Wicket 1.3 you don't need to put the
servlet context in your hrefs yourself, as Wicket
I think the best thing you can do is somehow trying to really get it
reproducable and try to fit it in a quickstart or junit test and open
a JIRA issue for it.
Eelco
On 6/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i'm having an strange behavior in my application.
i have a form with
Здравствуйте, Ballist1c.
Вы писали Friday, June 22, 2007, 5:32:27 AM:
whoa, okay guys, slow down a second... we need to get something clear here...
I am not smearing wicket, this is an impression I got when 5/5 wicket
websites i visited were slow there is nothing wrong with that and It
That's right. I've been afflicted, too. Look at some of the questions I
was asking today. Sigh.
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:24 -0700, Ballist1c wrote:
cure??? there is no cure... i promise you :D
igor.vaynberg wrote:
believe me, i know that. but hopefully the way i repsonded has
I'll try my best to find some spare time to do it. Hopefully over the weekend.
I already tried to open your tar.gz with Winzip 10, unfortunately
winzip only comes up with an error. Could you please either zip them
or send them to me separately. Thanks.
Juergen
On 6/21/07, Jan Kriesten [EMAIL
Did you try overriding #newLink, #newJunctionLink or #newNodeLink? I
don't really know the component, but it looks like you can return any
markup component you like there...
I think your best best is to browse around the code of the component
and it's superclasses and experiment a bit.
Eelco
I
I am indeed talking about the Go button in my form. It is providing
the correct behaviour.
Now, what I'm looking for is to allow the user to submit the form by
just hitting enter rather than having to click the Go button.
I thought that I would need to bind the enter key to the go button...
are
This feature has not yet been backported to 1.3 the reason being that
we first need to backport all of the markup fragment/render changes.
That will not happen in 1.3.
yes, open a jira issue please.
Juergen
On 6/21/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
open a jira issue please
-igor
Hope this helps
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=10675702framed=y
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Leangen
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:33 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Binding the
Also, I think that Julian Klappenbach had some good ideas on how to
build in good key binding support in Wicket. Julian, are you reading
with us?
Eelco
On 6/21/07, Joe Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope this helps
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=10675702framed=y
copy to the list, as sourceforge doesn't allow zip-attachments atm.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] html wicket:id=html CSS
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:53:23 +0200
From: Jan Kriesten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Juergen,
I'll try my best to find some spare time to do
All you need to do is override newNodeLink imho. Also to change row
background color you'll need to tweak the styles and add attribute
modifier inside populateItem, it's not really trivial, but it's not a
rocket science as well.
Simple alternateive in 1.3 would be to call setEnabled(false) on the
juergen, there are two of you in jira, which makes it hard to assign issues.
do you think you can work it out with asf infrastructure group to remove the
account you no longer use?
-igor
On 6/21/07, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This feature has not yet been backported to 1.3
Ok, thanks everybody!
So, am I to assume that the only way to do this is through the use of
Javascript?
If that's so, then I'll do as suggested in the previous posts.
I'll post back with the results of what I find, though if it's more
complicated than I thought, I may have to put it aside for
I'm not sure I fully understand your situation, but if your wicket front end
is obtaining xml-serialised versions of business objects (or data transfer
objects or whatever), can you not generate a simple Java version from the
xml schema? Then perhaps your colleagues objections about having to
On 6/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i'm having an strange behavior in my application.
i have a form with a listview inside and the items in this listview can be
reordered using buttons (that's why the list is inside a form). In the
form i have a link that opens a
Hi,
I got the latest 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT through Maven yesterday and all my pages
that use markup inheritance stopped working. My login page which does not
use markup inheritance works and then after submitting that ito goes to the
home page, nothing works.
Thing is I tried a very simple quickstart
Hello,
We have markup which displays currently visited(disabled) links in a
special way.
By default, if you use wicket:link, autolinks for current page will look
like:
spanemCurrent Page/em/span
I need to make them look like:
a class=selectedCurrent Page/a
This is just a design rule
What wicket version are you using? Nested forms are only supported in
1.3. If you are using modal window with 1.2, the only reliable way to
use forms is putting a page inside modal window.
-Matej
On 6/22/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's weird. You should be able to call setRequired from that
listener, that's the point why i have introduced it!
-Matej
On 6/22/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm *still* trying to find a way to modify a component *when the model is
bound*. The new
I'd prefer a meeting in work hours, if possible else we can just do it
after hours..
My weekends are totally booked though...
I could arrange something at jayway if we wanted to?
regards Nino
Frank Bille wrote:
Sounds good. Do you guys think we should try to find a date soon (like
in early
Ok I think the problem is related to the ReloadingWicketFilter which I was
extending and using. When I remove this, things are fine.
So my conclusion is that latest ReloadingWicketFilter has problems for pages
using Markup inheritance.
Thanks,
Peter.
On 6/22/07, Peter Thomas [EMAIL
I would very much like to attend, but I'm out of the country on that date.
I hope there will be more such gatherings in the future though!
Jan
On 14/06/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
As Wicket grows in popularity, we bump into increasing numbers of UK
users. We think
2007/6/19, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
take a look at the class
org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui.calendar.DatePicker (in
wicket-datetime)
there is the following statement in line 183
TextTemplateHeaderContributor.forJavaScript(DatePicker.class,
DatePicker.js,
On Friday, June 22, 2007, 7:33:40 AM, C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
believe me, i know that. but hopefully the way i repsonded has cured at
least one person, no hard feelings :)
I'm mostly just read-only on this list and not able to contribute as
much useful bits as
Gwyn Evans wrote:
On Friday, June 22, 2007, 7:33:40 AM, C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
believe me, i know that. but hopefully the way i repsonded has cured at
least one person, no hard feelings :)
I'm mostly just read-only on this list and not able to
Great idea with the calendar!
It is the same with me, after 16-17 is the best for me too.
/Flemming
On 6/22/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/22/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've created a public google calendar for us:
On 6/22/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've created a public google calendar for us:
http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=7mkimsnp84i09nh48u5ju59pqg%40group.calendar.google.com
And entered your proposition Flemming. It looks ok for me.
Cool, thx.
I
Op woensdag 20-06-2007 om 17:32 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Eelco
Hillenius:
Yeah, we should do that soon. We'll get to that within a few weeks hopefully.
Please don't forget to update the Gmane gmane.comp.java.wicket.*
newsgroup hierarchy too. Thanks. :)
regards,
--
Reinout van Schouwen
Hi, I'm not familiar with wicket sessions. I understand that I can
create my own session object that extends the WebSession, and that
will have some fields containing my sessions datas. In that case I
have to replace the ISessionFactory of my application.
The other choice to store datas in the
it should be pretty easy to update the wicketstuff-hibernate project to
verify this is broken. how should i proceed with this issue?
On 6/22/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's weird. You should be able to call setRequired from that
listener, that's the point why i have introduced
Actually I was just about to write a mail about starting a wicket stuff
contrib on this, but did not have time for it this morning, as I was
busy trying to fix a problem on the gmap contrib.
I'll continue this on the dev list, for now i'll create a svn repo for
1.3 on stuff svn.
it's gonna be
imo your best option is to override the newSession method in
Application and use your own custom session as it allows you to get
your objects back without casting, as you would have to with metadata,
and it allows you to do do some detach logic (if you need to).
Alternatively you could use the
Yes, indeed it does. Good catch. So you do need to get to the
httpsession directly after all. Which I guess is a bit safer.
Eelco
OK. So how am I going to get to the HttpSession directly?
-
This SF.net email is
shameless plug: http://blog.ehour.nl/index.php/archives/14
:)
Matthieu Casanova wrote:
Hi, I'm not familiar with wicket sessions. I understand that I can
create my own session object that extends the WebSession, and that
will have some fields containing my sessions datas. In that case I
have
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Kees de Kooter wrote:
OK. So how am I going to get to the HttpSession directly?
Something like ((WebRequest)getRequest).
getHttpServletRequest().getSession() . Typically to find this
kind of things it's a good idea to get a relevant object
(webSession or WebRequest in this
Congratz guys. This news will certainly turn some heads in your direction...
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits.
you should really create your own session.
Usage of the metadata things should really be avoided for that kind of data.
I almost could say. don't use meta data at all, its a wicket internal thing
to store quickly markers and stuff like that.
johan
On 6/22/07, Matthieu Casanova [EMAIL
Could you describe the problems in a JIRA issue? Thanks.
Eelco
On 6/22/07, Peter Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok I think the problem is related to the ReloadingWicketFilter which I was
extending and using. When I remove this, things are fine.
So my conclusion is that latest
2007/6/22, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
you should really create your own session.
Usage of the metadata things should really be avoided for that kind of data.
I almost could say. don't use meta data at all, its a wicket internal thing
to store quickly markers and stuff like that.
On 6/22/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've often seen folk want what I see as abstract tags that can then
be implemented by subclasses. The way I've handled that for our
application is by creating an abstract component (say it's a page)
with div tags with appropriate wicket:ids.
or create models that bind to xml, something like
class XmlPropertyModel(String xml, String path) extends
AbstractReadOnlyModel {
Object getObject() { return XmlUtils.getPath(xml, path); }
}
add(new TextField(foo, new XmlPropertyModel(xml, address.street));
also create anl
The quick start was in the included email, anyway here it is again ..
public interface IHelloListener extends IRequestListener
{
public static final RequestListenerInterface INTERFACE = new
RequestListenerInterface(
IHelloListener.class);
void onHello();
}
application.init() {
getmarkupsettings().setdefaultbeforedisabledlink(a class=\selected\);
getmarkupsettings().setdefaultafterdisabledlink(/a);
}
-igor
On 6/22/07, Serge P. Nekoval [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We have markup which displays currently visited(disabled) links in a
special
give us a quickstart/something we can work with and then we can take a look.
cant expect us to poke in the dark.
-igor
On 6/22/07, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to create a custom request listener like the following code,
but something is wrong because I always get the
Like Johan said, the typical case is to provide your own custom
session. You'll have strongly typed variables that way and that's the
whole idea users being able to provide their own in the first place.
Metadata is intended for framework-like use. When you don't know/
don't want to force clients
I've often seen folk want what I see as abstract tags that can then
be implemented by subclasses. The way I've handled that for our
application is by creating an abstract component (say it's a page)
with div tags with appropriate wicket:ids.
public class BasePage extends WebPage
{
public
Sure Eelco, JIRA logged: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-685
On 6/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you describe the problems in a JIRA issue? Thanks.
Eelco
On 6/22/07, Peter Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok I think the problem is related to the
yeah, dont think we ever thought about doing that...please open a jira
issue. it is probably something we should support.
-igor
On 6/22/07, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The quick start was in the included email, anyway here it is again ..
public interface IHelloListener extends
Eelco,
Thanks for the reply!
You could use the image map component (see the example in
org.apache.wicket.examples.linkomatic), but that would indeed result
in a lot of components for not that much gains.
The problem with the ImageMap component is that it doesn't support alt
and title
Does holding references to other Pages inside a Page make them be serialized
twice ? Like :
class MyPage extends Page {
ListPage otherPages;
}
would it make any difference if it was inside another object, like :
class MyPage extends Page {
MyPageHolder pageHolder; //
will try to get to it soon, maybe on the weekend
-igor
On 6/21/07, Marieke Vandamme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I could reproduce in a very simple example..
Could you check it for me? I don't see any exception..
MainPage.java
-
add(new InlineFrame(myIframe,
where are those writejavascript lines? in inlinepage constructor?
-igor
On 6/21/07, Marieke Vandamme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I could reproduce in a very simple example..
Could you check it for me? I don't see any exception..
MainPage.java
-
add(new
Does holding references to other Pages inside a Page make them be serialized
twice ? Like :
class MyPage extends Page {
ListPage otherPages;
}
Yep, if you are using the SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, which is the
default for Wicket 1.3, evry page will get serialized as a
Scott Swank wrote:
I've often seen folk want what I see as abstract tags that can then
be implemented by subclasses. The way I've handled that for our
application is by creating an abstract component (say it's a page)
with div tags with appropriate wicket:ids.
public class BasePage
On 6/23/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does holding references to other Pages inside a Page make them be
serialized
twice ? Like :
class MyPage extends Page {
ListPage otherPages;
}
Yep, if you are using the SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, which is the
default
59 matches
Mail list logo
