No 1.4 is enough for wicket 1.x
When wicket 2.0 is released you'll need JDK 1.5
Dipu wrote:
HI Ananth,
I am not sure , but can you check the JDK version you are using. I think you
will need the JDK 1.5
Cheers
Dipu
- Original Message -
From: Ananth Prakash
To:
Vote:
1. Give me the constructor change and the Java 5 functionality in one
pass (Wicket 2.0)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that
n Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There has been some work on session management, so I guess this may be
considered to be a bug. Could you please file a bug report?
Thanks,
Martijn
On 1/9/06, Crash_neo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble with a v
it
as serializable.
so try private class User implements Serializable.
that should solve the problem.
-Igor
On 1/9/06, *Crash_neo* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble with a very simple file.
For the record this works on wicket 1.1
I am now using wicket head
Nice article,
as a new user I like these kind of tuto's it gives me some grip on the
possibilities.
I am looking forward to he tips etc. your planning to write
R.J. Lorimer wrote:
I have posted a quick Tutorial to the Javalobby Tips Tricks section
presenting Wicket 1.1 (actually works with
Don't know if it is relevant any more, but I have the same problem, not
only with the 1.1b3 version,but with every version of the wicket.jar
uptill now. (always thought I was doing something wrong).
So u double confermation ...
Same config as Igor
Server version: Apache Tomcat/5.5.9
Server
+1:-)
Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote:
Are you going to make it opensource? I would like to have a look at
Wicket in a serious application.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Matej Knopp
Verzonden: woensdag 3 augustus 2005 0:23
+/- 0 (+1)
I like the option discussed in the wicket 1.1b2-rc1 string.
keep both and make the old one deprecated.
But if you can't have both, then break
Johan Compagner wrote:
We now have:
public AbstractChoice(final String id, IModel model, final List
choices, final IChoiceRenderer
