Re: [Wicket-user] filtertable and checkgroup cannot work together

2006-09-08 Thread wq
I made it. I replace this line --table.addTopToolbar(new FilterToolbar(table,provider)); with --add(new FilterPanel(filter-panel,table,provider)); the Filterpanel is copied from FilterToolbar with some modification and not added into table,the filterform is now out of table. it works fine!

Re: [Wicket-user] filtertable and checkgroup cannot work together

2006-09-06 Thread wq
thanks Igor! without a form, how can I get the filter input? have some sample codes? can I move the filterform out of the table? igor.vaynberg wrote: filter toolbar was not meant to be embedded in another form because it uses a form of its own, so for right now i would say that

Re: [Wicket-user] filtertable and checkgroup cannot work together

2006-09-06 Thread Igor Vaynberg
noep, no sample code. just try taking the original toolbar and removing the form it creates - and pass one into the constructor instead.-IgorOn 9/6/06, wq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks Igor!without a form, how can I get the filter input?have some sample codes?can I move the filterform out of

[Wicket-user] filtertable and checkgroup cannot work together

2006-08-31 Thread wq
final CheckGroup group=new CheckGroup(group, new ArrayList()); ... group.add(new CheckGroupSelector(groupselector)); .. SortableWapSrcDataProvider provider = new SortableWapSrcDataProvider(); DefaultDataTable table = new DefaultDataTable(table,columns,provider,30); table.addTopToolbar(new

Re: [Wicket-user] filtertable and checkgroup cannot work together

2006-08-31 Thread wq
HELP! HELP! wq wrote: final CheckGroup group=new CheckGroup(group, new ArrayList()); ... group.add(new CheckGroupSelector(groupselector)); .. SortableWapSrcDataProvider provider = new SortableWapSrcDataProvider(); DefaultDataTable table = new

Re: [Wicket-user] filtertable and checkgroup cannot work together

2006-08-31 Thread Igor Vaynberg
filter toolbar was not meant to be embedded in another form because it uses a form of its own, so for right now i would say that usecase is not supported. please add an rfe for it.if you want one right now then you have to create your own variant that doesnt use an embedded form. it would be