its already in for 2.0 en 1.3
On 12/3/06, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd say that a file descriptor leak is not an option in any case.
The code I supplied tests to see if something is a JarURLConnection and
get's the URL to the jar file itself if this is the case. You can th
I'd say that a file descriptor leak is not an option in any case.
The code I supplied tests to see if something is a JarURLConnection and
get's the URL to the jar file itself if this is the case. You can then
test if THAT url is modified. This is what the JarURLConnection does
anyway, so you do
We need a default that works for most users and via options something
that works for all. If we have something that by default works for
all, that's all the better.
Eelco
On 11/27/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No we as a framework should think about ALL users not MOST users.
>
No we as a framework should think about ALL users not MOST users.
And we have quit a lot OSGI users as far as i know. And we should work
in that environment as good as we can.
So we need to check jars. And besides that we don't know it everytime that
it is a jar..
It is just and url..
johan
On
* Johan Compagner:
> So instead of opening a connection inside the jar we just open a
> connection to the jar only. That would work for the app servers
> that uses the jar url connection but it won't help for example
> WebLogic and others. Because they use there own kind of thing..
We need to