[Wicket-user] mapping application to /
I'm trying to build my first real app using wicket and am looking for advice on how to structure it. I expect it will have moderately heavy traffic but most things can be cached with a simple ehcache Filter.The issue i see is that if i want to have wicket generated content on the root page, i need to map the application servlet to: url-pattern/*/url-patternBut if i do that, it looks like all the static content has to go through wicket too. Is there any way to have the web server directly serve content under: /static/*? Alternatively i guess i could map multiple application to deeper paths, but that seems like a bad idea.I've read that 2.0 will switch to a filter model, what is the best practice until then? thanks - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] mapping application to /
There is no need to use /*. In fact it is the least favourable solution. Take a look at the examples. Juergen On 11/5/06, ryan mckinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to build my first real app using wicket and am looking for advice on how to structure it. I expect it will have moderately heavy traffic but most things can be cached with a simple ehcache Filter. The issue i see is that if i want to have wicket generated content on the root page, i need to map the application servlet to: url-pattern/*/url-pattern But if i do that, it looks like all the static content has to go through wicket too. Is there any way to have the web server directly serve content under: /static/*? Alternatively i guess i could map multiple application to deeper paths, but that seems like a bad idea. I've read that 2.0 will switch to a filter model, what is the best practice until then? thanks - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] mapping application to /
The examples have a static /index.html and multiple apps defined at /helloworld, /echo, etc each one has its own session (if i understand correctly)I'd like to have wicket style templates on index.html and share session attributes across the sub pages (specifically user authentication) Do i need to map an Application to index.html also?thanks(i apologize if this is super basic)On 11/5/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is no need to use /*. In fact it is the least favourablesolution. Take a look at the examples.JuergenOn 11/5/06, ryan mckinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to build my first real app using wicket and am looking for advice on how to structure it.I expect it will have moderately heavy traffic but most things can be cached with a simple ehcache Filter. The issue i see is that if i want to have wicket generated content on the root page, i need to map the application servlet to:url-pattern/*/url-pattern But if i do that, it looks like all the static content has to go through wicket too.Is there any way to have the web server directly serve content under: /static/*? Alternatively i guess i could map multiple application to deeper paths, but that seems like a bad idea. I've read that 2.0 will switch to a filter model, what is the best practice until then? thanks - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user-Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] mapping application to /
On 11/5/06, ryan mckinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The examples have a static /index.html and multiple apps defined at /helloworld, /echo, etc each one has its own session (if i understand correctly) In case of the examples index.html is registered in web.xml as the welcome page welcome-file-list welcome-fileindex.html/welcome-file /welcome-file-list and allows you to easily select any of the example applications. A session is created by the servlet container per user (not per application) and can be used to stored eg user information. Because a session is a per user object, it is available for the various pages which make up your application. I'd like to have wicket style templates on index.html and share session attributes across the sub pages (specifically user authentication) Do i need to map an Application to index.html also? thanks (i apologize if this is super basic) On 11/5/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is no need to use /*. In fact it is the least favourable solution. Take a look at the examples. Juergen On 11/5/06, ryan mckinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to build my first real app using wicket and am looking for advice on how to structure it. I expect it will have moderately heavy traffic but most things can be cached with a simple ehcache Filter. The issue i see is that if i want to have wicket generated content on the root page, i need to map the application servlet to: url-pattern/*/url-pattern But if i do that, it looks like all the static content has to go through wicket too. Is there any way to have the web server directly serve content under: /static/*? Alternatively i guess i could map multiple application to deeper paths, but that seems like a bad idea. I've read that 2.0 will switch to a filter model, what is the best practice until then? thanks - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] mapping application to /
I'm trying to build my first real app using wicket and am looking for advice on how to structure it. I expect it will have moderately heavy traffic but most things can be cached with a simple ehcache Filter. Don't cache session internal pages though... be sure to only cache bookmarkable pages if you really want to. Better: don't cache the output of pages at all, but instead focus in making your business/service layer more efficient (e.g. cache your domain model/ queries etc). If you still need a higher throughput, generating static pages is a better solution than just caching imo. The issue i see is that if i want to have wicket generated content on the root page, i need to map the application servlet to: url-pattern/*/url-pattern But if i do that, it looks like all the static content has to go through wicket too. Is there any way to have the web server directly serve content under: /static/*? You can put a filter on top of the Wicket servlet, and if it matches with static content, you just don't pass control further the chain (Wicket). Alternatively i guess i could map multiple application to deeper paths, but that seems like a bad idea. Is it that bad to have /app or /dyn or whatever in your path? I've read that 2.0 will switch to a filter model It already has had that for quite a while. what is the best practice until then? I don't know if there is any. Different people like different things. Personally, I'm not worried at all by having e.g. /app for the Wicket part of your app. Eelco - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
