Re: [Wien] Bader

2020-03-24 Thread delamora
Thank you, I will Pablo Try looking in the lecture notes on the W2k page. I am sure you will find a Based exercise. _ Professor Laurence Marks "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi

Re: [Wien] TELNES calculation

2020-03-24 Thread Ali Baghizhadeh
Thank you Pavel. I will do accordingly. Best regards Ali From: Wien on behalf of Pavel Ondračka Sent: 24 March 2020 10:38:44 To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users Subject: Re: [Wien] TELNES calculation Dear Ali, please do core holes only for atoms with

Re: [Wien] TELNES calculation

2020-03-24 Thread Pavel Ondračka
Dear Ali, please do core holes only for atoms with multiplicity 1 (otherwise you add multiple core hole at once, and you will get interaction between them, which is what you want to avoid with the supercell in the first place)! Just name (number) one oxygen atom for every non-equivalent oxygen

Re: [Wien] TELNES calculation

2020-03-24 Thread Ali Baghizhadeh
Dear Prof. Blaha Thank you very much. I did create supercell (2x2x1) and I am using LDA+U. Again some oxygen have multiplicity of 3, which may result in increase in the intensity of that specific oxygen. Currently I do non-spin polarized calculations, but I wish to introduce AFM state in the

Re: [Wien] TELNES calculation

2020-03-24 Thread Peter Blaha
ad 1) no case.inm has no effect on telnes. It is used only during run_lapw. ad 2) Yes, you should do the calculations for all non-equivalent O atoms and sum the results including their multiplicity. (at least when you see some differences in their corresponding DOS). What you did not mention: