[Wien] shell decomposed hyperfine field!

2013-10-02 Thread susanta mohanta
Dear Prof. Stefaan Cottenier and wien2k user, I have a basic question regarding the hyperfine field calculations. Although we get the core and valence contribution (orbital and spin-dipolar in u+so cases) to the hyperfine fields, how do I get the shell decomposed values; i.e. 1s, 2s, 3s etc

[Wien] Clarification on (a) effective moment including spin-orbit coupling and (b) spin-state configuration

2013-10-02 Thread Kalpana
Dear wien-users, Using runsp_lapw -so I obtain the converged results for Sr2CoO4 doped with La to Sr-site: With U=4 eV for Co1 and Co2, I obtain their spin-moment as: :MMI001: MAGNETIC MOMENT IN SPHERE 1=1.83531 :MMI002: MAGNETIC MOMENT IN SPHERE 2=2.60958 orbital moment as:

Re: [Wien] Clarification on (a) effective moment including spin-orbit coupling and (b) spin-state configuration

2013-10-02 Thread tran
(i) I don't know Sr2CoO4, but if Co1 and Co2 are inequivalent (e.g., they have a different environment), then maybe this is not surprising. (ii) SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT IN CELL is the number of up-electrons minus the number of down-electrons. (iii) You can use instgen_lapw -ask to generate

Re: [Wien] how to start an mBJ after a GGA calculation of the band structure and an unexplicable error

2013-10-02 Thread tran
I don't know what can be the problem in your low parameters directory, but maybe a clean_lapw or running on another machine can help. In your high parameters directory, if case.klist is the proper file then you can do the preparatory steps for the mBJ as usual. F. Tran On Wed, 2 Oct 2013,

Re: [Wien] shell decomposed hyperfine field!

2013-10-02 Thread Peter Blaha
It can be done only in a bit tedious way. After an scf calculation, modify case.inc and put only the desired core state (e.g 1s) for your atom of interest. x lcore -up / -dn x mixer and check the core contribution in scfm. Then redo it with 1s + 2s, Remember, at the end if this

Re: [Wien] Clarification on (a) effective moment including spin-orbit coupling and (b) spin-state configuration

2013-10-02 Thread Peter Blaha
(ii) When considering the GGA+U+SOC (spin-orbit coupling), I find that the results on spin-magnetic moment in a cell significantly changes with respect to GGA+U. For example, With GGA+U :MMTOT: SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT IN CELL = 5.00042 With GGA+U+SOC :MMTOT: SPIN MAGNETIC

Re: [Wien] Clarification on (a) effective moment including spin-orbit coupling and (b) spin-state configuration

2013-10-02 Thread Kalpana
Dear Prof. Blaha and Tran, Thanks for your nice comment. Your reply to my first and third questions in clear now. However, I am still not clear to my first question. While performing the calculations for GGA+U and GGA+U+SOC, I obtained solutions of total spin-magnetic moemnts as below: With

Re: [Wien] how to start an mBJ after a GGA calculation of the band structure and an unexplicable error

2013-10-02 Thread Fabiana Da Pieve
Dear Prof. /Dr. Tran Thank you very much for your answer. Yes indeed you are right, if the klist file is the one related to the SCF GGA run I should be able to start the mBJ run without problems. I was confused by the idea that , since I also calculated the band structure in that directory (with

Re: [Wien] Clarification on (a) effective moment including spin-orbit coupling and (b) spin-state configuration

2013-10-02 Thread tran
As I said, :MMTOT is the number of up-electrons minus the number of down-electrons, which obviously means that orbital(L) is not included. If your system is an insulator, then :MMTOT is an integer (e.g., :MMTOT=23-18=5), but if it is a metal, then :MMTOT can be a non-integer (e.g.,

Re: [Wien] Clarification on (a) effective moment including spin-orbit coupling and (b) spin-state configuration

2013-10-02 Thread Kalpana
Dear Tran, Thank you very much. The studied system is not an insulator, rather it is a metal with/without SOC. As far as the integer moment is concerned, Half-metals also carries an integer effective moment. Right? So, should I stick to the conclusion that GGA+U and GGA+U+SOC calculations