Thank you Prof Marks
I updated my concept now.
regards
Bhamu
On 27-Feb-2016 6:49 pm, "Laurence Marks" wrote:
> Sorry, but the other email response was not right.
>
> run_lapw uses just the full density, no spin. Probably what you want to
> use.
>
> runsp_c_lapw has the same density in the up/dn
Sorry, but the other email response was not right.
run_lapw uses just the full density, no spin. Probably what you want to use.
runsp_c_lapw has the same density in the up/dn spins. It can be used to
include terms such as orbital corrections with a non-magnetic density (as
up=dn).
runsp_lapw is
Hello Komal
run_lapw represents simple scf calculation which does not include any
magnetic/SO/SP effect while runsp_c_lapw should be invoked if you are using
spin polarised complex calculation.
Regards
Bhamu
On 27-Feb-2016 4:46 pm, "Dr. Komal Bapna" wrote:
> Dear Wien users
>
> I want to get the
Dear Wien users
I want to get the non-magnetic ground state of a system. I am not able to
find if there is any difference between run_lapw and runsp_c_lapw commands.
Which command I should use.
Regards
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.
4 matches
Mail list logo