Re: [Wien] A few (more) elementary -so questions (with onsite -eece)

2015-05-06 Thread pieper
Sorry, the comment was confusing. The spin moments specified in the initial configuration of course point along the axis specified by the direction. What I wanted to point out is that for symmetry reasons this is the only meaningfull component you can specify. In this sense symmetry comes

Re: [Wien] Position of Atoms in AFM calculation.

2015-05-06 Thread Abed Reg
Dear Murugan I'm also working on the antiferromagnetic calculation and for the materials that have high symmetry like cubic systems, we do not need to use supercell function to do that like the examples of Cr and NiO. The antiferromagnetic structure of your material is linked below: Good luck

Re: [Wien] Error in mpi+k point parallelization across multiple nodes

2015-05-06 Thread Gavin Abo
Ok, now it is clear that there is no additional error messages. Unfortunately, I cannot tell specifically what went wrong from those error messages. You might try replacing mpirun with mpirun_rsh. As you can see at

[Wien] Fwd: non-symmorphic space group and electric field with spin-orbit coupling calculations

2015-05-06 Thread Martin Gmitra
Dear Wien2k users, We would like to investigate effect of electric field on spin-orbit coupling in a non-magnetic system within slab geometry. Depending on initial atomic position within unit cell we can obtain after initialization either monoclinic Bravais lattice with symmorphic space group (6

[Wien] initial projections with spin-orbit coupling for wien2wannier?

2015-05-06 Thread Xu Wenhu
Dear All, I am using wien2wannier to find MLWF for Sr2IrO4, as demonstrated in the paper: J. Kuneš, R. Arita, P. Wissgott, A. Toschi, H. Ikeda, K. Held, Comp. Phys. Commun. 181, 1888 (2010) I have read the thread in http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg11584.html, but

Re: [Wien] Error in mpi+k point parallelization across multiple nodes

2015-05-06 Thread lung Fermin
Thanks for the reply. Please see below. As I asked before, did you give us all the error information in the case.dayfile and from standard output? It is not entirely clear in your previous posts, but it looks to me that you might have only provided information from the case.dayfile and the

Re: [Wien] Error in mpi+k point parallelization across multiple nodes

2015-05-06 Thread Gavin Abo
See below for my comments. Thanks for all the information and suggestions. I have tried to change -lmkl_blacs_intelmpi_lp64 to -lmkl_blacs_lp64 and recompile. However, I got the following error message in the screen output LAPW0 END [cli_14]: [cli_15]: [cli_6]: aborting job: Fatal error

Re: [Wien] Position of Atoms in AFM calculation.

2015-05-06 Thread Fecher, Gerhard
It seems that this is simply a structure in space group P1 (1) but why not using a structure with higher symmetry for an afm calculation ? As I told already before, the symmetry will depend on for what type of AFM order you like to calculate. Some time ago, Pablo gave already a struct file in a