[Wien] Error in lapw1/2.error file, that does not stop running

2018-05-31 Thread Luc Fruchter
Hi, While running a case, I have noticed that the lapw1/2.error file is not empty, and contains 'Error in lapw1/2'. However, this does NOT stop the case. Could this be related to the parallel mode that I use ? Indeed, I have noticed that this did not happen in the preceding similar case

[Wien] x lapw5 in w2web defines lapw5.def ?

2018-08-01 Thread Luc Fruchter
Dear users, I am trying to plot the case.r2v density, using the w2web interface. It seems that the "x lapw5" button of the electron-density task does more than simply execute lapw5, as the lapw5.def file (supposed to be an input) will be changed back after this to the default options (so, it

[Wien] configuring parallel options using ssh

2018-09-10 Thread Luc Fruchter
Dear users, I failed configuring the parallel options to run cases on several machines, each of them with several CPUs, driven by ssh protocol. * Configuring the parallel options with: shared memory, MPI = 0, ssh protocol, allows to run parallel jobs using several CPUs on the same machine.

[Wien] Xcrysden works for structure view, not for electron density display

2018-06-28 Thread Luc Fruchter
Dear all, Xcrysden works fine from the w2web interface (run locally), when viewing a structure. So, I think it is correctly installed and configured. However, it displays "requires X-Windows system ... Calc" when trying to use the "Calculate density with Xcrysden" button, or "requires

[Wien] updating Wien2k

2018-10-01 Thread Luc Fruchter
Hello, If I: - extract all modified SRC_XX.tar.gz files in WIENROOT directory, - run siteconfig_lapw (from any location) and select Update option, should this automatically update and compile all new SRC_XX folders, and nothing more is needed ? Thanks

[Wien] A way to evaluate if minimization without SO is correct ?

2018-12-04 Thread Luc Fruchter
It has been said many times that forces are not correct when spin-orbit is included. Also, that the contribution of SO should generally be small, compared to energies that determine the equilibrium positions, so that minimization without SO should be a good approximation, for most cases. I

[Wien] configuring parallel options using ssh

2018-09-17 Thread Luc Fruchter
There is indeed too few information from me. I try to configure the k-paralellization over several PCs connected by a regular (slow) network. I use w2web, so that commands are transparent to me. Wien2k is installed on all machines, and paths are the same on all machines. SSH works without

Re: [Wien] configuring parallel options using ssh

2018-09-17 Thread Luc Fruchter
Thanks to clarify my poor knowledge on clusters ! Is it enough if these directories hold the case directories for Wien2k, or is other data needed ? ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at

[Wien] Fortran compiling errors to MAIN program

2019-05-14 Thread Luc Fruchter
Hi, I tried to compile the new version 18.2 to update my old 17 one, and I encountered two errors (I use latest Intel fortran compiler from Parallel Studio): - In SRC_mixer: for main.c: undefined reference to 'MAIN__' and then multiple 'undefined reference' - In SRC_nmr: the same errors.

Re: [Wien] Fortran compiling errors to MAIN program

2019-05-14 Thread Luc Fruchter
I will do this. The reason why I replaced the folders and tried to recompile the whole thing, is that I thought this was equivalent to a new installation, which is the recommended way of the instructions. Should a genuine new installation then consist in creating a new folder for the new

Re: [Wien] Fortran compiling errors to MAIN program

2019-05-14 Thread Luc Fruchter
To update the version, I just unzipped the new folders in the old directory for SRC folders, to replace them. The site configuration apparently picked up the old compiler options, so I did not change them: -O2 -FR -mpl -w -prec_div -pc80 -pad -ip -DINTEL-VML -traceback -assume buffered_io

Re: [Wien] Fortran compiling errors to MAIN program

2019-05-14 Thread Luc Fruchter
I finally erased all files in the old Wienroot directory, installed the new version from it, using the old options for the compiler, and it works. Apparently, only part of the options where copied when the SRC folders were replaced in the first procedure. Some others, related to the latest

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-03 Thread Luc Fruchter
Indeed, I am using ifort 208.3.222 with the options: -O2 -FR -mp1 -w -prec_div -pc80 -pad -ip -DINTEL_VML -traceback -assume buffered_io -I$(MKLROOT)/include I will try to change the options / update ifort to a newer version. ___ Wien mailing list

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-05 Thread Luc Fruchter
Finally, I have the same problem with Intel 2019.4.243 compiler. My cases are 50 and 150 atoms. I will try the 2017.2 / Intel-tested Linux version. ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-03 Thread Luc Fruchter
The cumulated amount of disk reading per process may be obtained using the 'system monitor' / 'processes' tool (provided in Sci. Linux in my case). Here, this is not a swap problem: I always disable swap, as large memory overflow would almost freeze the system - I much prefer that it crashes.

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-04 Thread Luc Fruchter
I am presently trying 2019.4.243 Intel version on the machines that were problematic with 2018 version. Up to now, I haven't encountered problems. ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-02 Thread Luc Fruchter
I am facing a problem with lapw2c on a machine running the 18.2 version of Wien2k. I suspect this is a machine problem, rather than a Wien2k one, but would like to be sure: As lapw2c runs in parallel in a cycle, the lapw2c processes will all try to read a very large amount of data from the

[Wien] apw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-29 Thread Luc Fruchter
What comes out as a surprise (for me), is that the memory needed for lapw2s does not scale with the number of CPUs, while it does for lapw1s: when I reduce the number of CPUs, lapw1s memory scales down proportionaly, while total .vector files size is unchanged, and so there is no improvement

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-29 Thread Luc Fruchter
I've just seen your remark on presentation, here it is for the last run: The case is with 154 atoms (matrix-size 19000), without inversion symmetry; 500 k-points. It is running on a single PC (Intel Xeon 5650 with 24 GB RAM and 2 cores for this run) and I use WIEN2k_19.1 with ifort/mkl

[Wien] case.inM file missing for mini in 19.1

2019-07-23 Thread Luc Fruchter
With Wien2k 19.1 version, latest Intel ifort compiler (2019.4) and latest Ubuntu (18.04.2): with an old case from 18.2 version, I initialized again the case (using w2web) and, using mini.position from the w2web interface, tried to vizualize the case.inm file from the w2web link. This provided

[Wien] case.inM file missing for mini in 19.1

2019-07-24 Thread Luc Fruchter
Yes, but why is case.inM created empty this time ? ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:

[Wien] case.inM file missing for mini in 19.1

2019-07-24 Thread Luc Fruchter
Finally w2web does create and show .inM file: apparently, this should not be tried on too simple, symmetric cases with no force, which will not provide this file. Why my old case first showed .inm instead of .inM will remain a mystery. Thanks ___ Wien

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-17 Thread Luc Fruchter
The Intel 2017/2 version of the compiler did not help. To fix the ideas, lapw2c has read ~ 800 GiB during 13 hours, which makes at 20 MB/s, 11 hours spent reading disk. The lapw2c routine will finally end, without any error, after it has read Tbites of data from the disk. We could not detect

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-25 Thread Luc Fruchter
I changed to Wien2k 19.1 version, latest Intel ifort compiler (2019.4) and latest Ubuntu (18.04.2), shared memory, 4 CPUs, same case with 154 atoms : - no more anomalous reading of the disk from parallel lapw2c - the system is however slowed down a lot (as seen from switching between

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-26 Thread Luc Fruchter
Yes, I have shared memory. Swap on disk is disabled, so the system must manage differently here. I just wonder now: is there a way to estimate the memory needed for the lapw2s, without running scf up to these ? Is this the total .vector size ? ___

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-26 Thread Luc Fruchter
I think it is unlikely related to a specific machine or OS problem: I encountered the same situation with different machines types, different OS (Redhat Sci. Linux, Ubuntu), different Intel compilers versions (from 2017 to 2019). But it could be some common configuration problem. I don't use

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-25 Thread Luc Fruchter
I was however intrigued by this heavy load of the system, with very little CPU use (which means unefficient computation). Actually, lapw2 routines are still blocked for some I/O most of the time. This I/O is however no longer a physical reading from the hard disk (and so does not show up in

[Wien] lapw2c tries to read an anomalous amount of data

2019-07-25 Thread Luc Fruchter
So, my understanding of the situation is that lapw1 may create .vector files that are larger than the amount of memory needed by the lapw1 step. At the lapw2 step, the program must handle these files with less memory than needed, hence these physical / cached unefficient readings. This sounds

[Wien] init_orb_lapw -orb does not take atom parameters from command line

2020-04-13 Thread Luc Fruchter
With Wien2K 19.1 and Ubuntu : calling "init_orb_lapw -orb " from the terminal window does list the atoms of the unit cell, and then calls for: "Enter the name, l, U(Ry) and J of the Atoms (eg. Fe 2 0.3 0.0; exit with RETURN)" However, answering with a 4 data string separated with spaces as

[Wien] init_orb_lapw -orb does not take atom parameters from command line

2020-04-14 Thread Luc Fruchter
>You could trying changing the top of line of the init_orb_lapw script (in the $WIENROOT directory) from #!/bin/csh -f to #!/bin/tcsh -f It worked ! Thanks a lot. ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at

[Wien] "vresp: Undefined variable" with runsp_c_lapw

2020-04-20 Thread Luc Fruchter
While running "runsp_c_lapw -orb -so -p", I get a message error similar to the one already observed in "runafm_lapw" (Wien2k 19.1): LAPW0 END ORB   END LAPW1 END LAPWSO END vresp: Undefined variable Is this a problem similar to the one in :

[Wien] GGA+U : error reading case.dmatup

2020-04-15 Thread Luc Fruchter
Dear all, While running runsp_lapw -orb for GGA+U on Sr2RhO4, I get the following error at the beginning of cycle 2: "end-of-file during read, unit 10, file /... case.dmatup" There is only one error file not empty, uporb.error with "Error in Vorb" I have run also the same GGA+U on simple

Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-27 Thread Luc Fruchter
Sorry to be back with this again, but it seems that lines for the corrected init_orb_lapw script: set atoms=`grep RMT $file.struct|cut -c1-5` set nat=$#atoms will count two atoms instead of one, each time the atom symbol is only one character long (because of space between atom and

Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-26 Thread Luc Fruchter
# remember: the recommendation is to do this in steps in order to get # more likely the groundstate for correlated compounds and usually you # also want to see anyway what is the effect of SO and of U as compared # to a plain PBE calculation runsp_lapw (-p) save_lapw PBE_no_so runsp_lapw -so (-p)

[Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-23 Thread Luc Fruchter
Dear all, I have been trying to perform U+SO comptations on Sr2RhO4 to get a bandstructure. My scheme is the following: Initialize spin-polarized case init_orb_lapw -orb init_so_lapw runsp_lapw -orb -so define case.klist_band lapw1 -up -band -orb lapw1 -dn -band -orb put Fermi energy in

[Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-23 Thread Luc Fruchter
When SO is activated, this is lapwso (and not lapw1) which adds the U-potential to the Hamiltonian matrix (have a look at the file :log). Thanks for rectifying (you probably mean 'adds SO'). I should have written for the actual scheme "lapw1 -up -band -orb -so" which may be, from U.G. program

[Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-23 Thread Luc Fruchter
Thanks for your very kind help: the whole process runs with no error error now. (I am still puzzled what the -orb and -so options in lapw1 are for: in my mind, this should have called the lapwso -orb extra process that you pointed). I summarize correct steps for future readers: initialize

[Wien] GGA+U : error reading case.dmatup

2020-04-15 Thread Luc Fruchter
>  And a U of 3 Ry ~ 40 eV forRh-d !!! This is my fault: I used eV instead of Ry. > 4 times the same atom initso_lapw lists the 4 equivalent Rh atoms, with identical index. Although I gave the l,U,J input for one Rh atom, it apparently considers 4 unequivalent ones ?

[Wien] GGA+U : error reading case.dmatup

2020-04-15 Thread Luc Fruchter
I manually suppressed the extra lines in both files (and changed this enormous U ...): cycles chain nicely now. Thanks for your kind help. ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

[Wien] electron density maps for several unit cells

2020-09-08 Thread Luc Fruchter
Thanks for your help. Indeed, I could compute the 3 x 3 (x,y) plane using 4 x 4 x 6 (nxsh,nysh,nzsh) nearest neighbor cells in case.in5 (manual page 175). ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at

[Wien] join_vectorfiles to be used with a different syntax

2020-08-31 Thread Luc Fruchter
I have tried to execute join_vectorfiles (source in SRC_trig) to concatenate case.vector files from a parallel run, using the syntax as given in the 'join_vectorfiles.f' fortran program: '(x) join_vectorfiles [-up/-dn]   case   number_of_files' This did not work, as the program tried to open

[Wien] cleaning up scratch dir

2020-07-23 Thread Luc Fruchter
Dear all, I am running parallel k-points over several nodes, which run fine (19.1 version). However, I have defined local scratch directories on nodes to reduce file transfers (defining the scratch variable in .bashrc), as recommended. I see that .vector files accumulate there at each case