Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

2015-01-02 Thread Oliver Keyes
Bah; dropped a digit when reading the y-axis. My bad. My concerns about straight extrapolation for this model remain, however. On 2 January 2015 at 11:31, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: 3 billion being...above the upper bound of the extrapolation you've made? Uh-huh. Extrapolation

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

2015-01-02 Thread Oliver Keyes
On 2 January 2015 at 15:08, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote: Oliver Keyes wrote: ... Extrapolation is not a particularly useful method to use for the budget, because it assumes endless exponential growth. I agree. Formal budgeting usually shouldn't extend further than three to

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

2015-01-02 Thread Denny Vrandečić
I have one or two ideas about what to do with 3 billion US Dollar. It would be a huge step towards some of my stretch goals for the movement. On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 12:08:43 PM James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote: Oliver Keyes wrote: ... Extrapolation is not a particularly useful method to

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

2015-01-02 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, It is known that education is a great way to eradicate poverty. We know that Wikipedia brings information and is educational. When the effect of your 3 billion dollar brings education and effectively helps to eradicate poverty it is well worth it. No irony intended. Thanks, GerardM On

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

2015-01-02 Thread James Salsman
Oliver Keyes wrote: ... Extrapolation is not a particularly useful method to use for the budget, because it assumes endless exponential growth. I agree. Formal budgeting usually shouldn't extend further than three to five years in the nonprofit sector (long-term budgeting is unavoidable in

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

2015-01-02 Thread Taha Yasseri
Dear all, Happy new year. I'm very sorry and with all due respect, I'm guessing this is getting a bit off-topic. Let me kindly remind that this is the Wiki-research mailing list. Thanks and have a wonderful year ahead! .Taha On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo)

[Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

2015-01-02 Thread James Salsman
In ten years time, I predict the Foundation will raise $3 billion: http://i.imgur.com/hdoAIan.jpg -- Forwarded message -- From: James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 9:01 PM Subject: $55 million raised in 2014 To: Wikimedia Mailing List

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

2015-01-02 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Denny Vrandečić, 02/01/2015 21:17: I have one or two ideas about what to do with 3 billion US Dollar. It would be a huge step towards some of my stretch goals for the movement. :) 3 billions are not that much money, for instance they're only enough to pay 6 months of operating costs of a poor

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

2015-01-02 Thread James Salsman
... here are a couple illustrations of some reasons I believe a ten year extrapolation of Foundation fundraising is completely reasonable: http://imgur.com/a/mV72T Words tend to be more useful than contextless images. I meant that the very sharply declining cost of solar (and wind) energy,

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

2015-01-02 Thread Oliver Keyes
On 2 January 2015 at 18:14, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote: ... This is not a discussion for research-l On the contrary, please see e.g. http://www.wikisym.org/os2014-files/proceedings/p609.pdf this Foundation-sponsored IEG effort can serve as a confirmatory replication of that