Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming Research Newsletter: New Papers Open For Review

[Mohammed Sadat Abdulai]

 (to correct a mistake in my previous mail, we’re actually preparing for the 
September issue of the newsletter).
Please take a look at https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201809 and add your 
name next to any paper you are interested in covering. Our target publication 
date is September 30 but text should be in by September 28.
Thanks
-Masssly

 

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Mohammed Sadat Abdulai  
wrote:

 
Hi everyone,
We’re preparing for the August 2018 research newsletter and looking for 
contributors. Please take a look at https://etherpad.wikimedia. org/p/WRN201808 
and add your name next to any paper you are interested in covering. Our target 
publication date is on September 28 UTC although actual publication might 
happen several days later. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are 
most welcome.

Highlights from this month:   
   - "Sharing Small Pieces of the World": Increasing and Broadening 
Participation in Wikimedia Commons
   - A Wikia Census: Motives, Tools and and Insights
   - Characterizing the Triggering Phenomenon in Wikipedia
   - Comparative Analysis of the Informativeness and Encyclopedic Style of the 
Popular Web Information Sources
   - Do less active participants make active participants more active? An 
examination of Chinese Wikipedia   

   - Do We All Talk Before We Type?: Understanding Collaboration in Wikipedia 
Language Editions   

   - Evaluating Wikipedia as a Source of Information for Disease Understanding  
 

   - Neural Article Pair Modeling for Wikipedia Sub-article Matching   

   - The Battle for Wikipedia: The New Age of ‘Lost Victories’?   

   - The impact of news exposure on collective attention in the United States 
during the 2016 Zika epidemic   

   - University Students in the Educational Field and Wikipedia Vandalism   

   - What is the Commons Worth? Estimating the Value of Wikimedia Imagery by 
Observing Downstream Use

Masssly, Tilman Bayer and Dario Taraborelli
[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Research:Newsletter
  
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming Research Newsletter: New Papers Open For Review

[Tilman Bayer]

Hi Masssly,

thanks! But that's actually the old Etherpad for the previous issue - as I
said earlier today/yesterday, the new pad should be up at
https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201809  shortly. Perhaps you could send
a followup notice with the corrected link then. For now I have put a note
on top of the old pad.

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Mohammed Sadat Abdulai 
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> We’re preparing for the August 2018 research newsletter and looking for
> contributors. Please take a look at https://etherpad.wikimedia.
> org/p/WRN201808 and add your name next to any paper you are interested in
> covering. Our target publication date is on September 28 UTC although
> actual publication might happen several days later. As usual, short notes
> and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
>
>
> Highlights from this month:
>
>- "Sharing Small Pieces of the World": Increasing and Broadening
>Participation in Wikimedia Commons
>- A Wikia Census: Motives, Tools and and Insights
>- Characterizing the Triggering Phenomenon in Wikipedia
>- Comparative Analysis of the Informativeness and Encyclopedic Style
>of the Popular Web Information Sources
>- Do less active participants make active participants more active? An
>examination of Chinese Wikipedia
>- Do We All Talk Before We Type?: Understanding Collaboration in
>Wikipedia Language Editions
>- Evaluating Wikipedia as a Source of Information for Disease
>Understanding
>- Neural Article Pair Modeling for Wikipedia Sub-article Matching
>- The Battle for Wikipedia: The New Age of ‘Lost Victories’?
>- The impact of news exposure on collective attention in the United
>States during the 2016 Zika epidemic
>- University Students in the Educational Field and Wikipedia Vandalism
>- What is the Commons Worth? Estimating the Value of Wikimedia Imagery
>by Observing Downstream Use
>
>
> Masssly, Tilman Bayer and Dario Taraborelli
>
> [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
>
>


-- 
Tilman Bayer
Senior Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

[FULBERT]

This is a helpful way of communicating this, along with dates and links. Thanks 
for what appears to be a new and clearer (at least to me) format in this. 
Signed up for 2!

-

With Incredulity toward Metanarratives, 

Jeffrey
User:FULBERT
fulb...@fulbert-avebury.com

> On Feb 12, 2018, at 5:30 AM, Mohammed Sadat Abdulai  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi everyone,
> We’re preparing forthe February 2018 research newsletter and looking for 
> contributors. Please takea look at: 
> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201802 and add your name next to any 
> paper you are interested in covering. Our targetpublication date is on 
> February 19 UTC. As usual, short notes and one-paragraphreviews are most 
> welcome.
> Highlights fromthis month:   
>   - Examining Wikipedia With a Broader Lens: Quantifying the Value of 
> Wikipedia’s Relationships with Other Large-Scale Online Communities   
> 
>   - Evaluating Wikipedia as a self-learning resource for statistics: You know 
> they'll use it   
> 
>   - SPOTLIGHT Gesundheit: Gesundheitsinfos   
> 
>   - Ongoing Events in Wikipedia: A Cross-lingual Case Study   
> 
>   - Leveraging structural-context similarity of Wikipedia links to predict 
> twitter user locations   
> 
>   - On the Self-similarity of Wikipedia Talks: a Combined 
> Discourse-analytical and Quantitative Approach   
> 
>   - Usage of Wikipedia by health science and social sciences & humanities 
> undergraduates of University of Peradeniya and South Eastern University of 
> Sri Lanka   
> 
>   - Automatic Generation of Wiktionary Entries for Finno-Ugric Minority 
> Languages   
> 
>   - Vandalism Detection and Triple Scoring   
> 
>   - Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution 
> and use of citations in the English Wikipedia   
> 
>   - Effects of Contributor Experience on the Quality of Health-Related 
> Wikipedia Articles   
> 
>   - Emo, Love, and God: Making Sense of Urban Dictionary, a Crowd-Sourced 
> Online Dictionary   
> 
>   - Fostering Public Good Contributions with Symbolic Awards: A Large-Scale 
> Natural Field Experiment at Wikipedia   
> 
>   - The Wisdom of Polarized Crowds   
> 
>   - Can conference papers have information value through Wikipedia? An 
> investigation of four engineering fields   
> 
>   - Wikipedia-integrated publishing: a comparison of successful models   
> 
>   - Use of Louisiana's Digital Cultural Heritage by Wikipedians   
> 
>   - Collaborative Approach to Developing a Multilingual Ontology: A Case 
> Study of Wikidata   
> 
>   - Knowledge categorization affects popularity and quality of Wikipedia 
> articles   
> 
>   - The Conceptual Correspondence between the Encyclopaedia and Wikipedia   
> 
>   - Analysis of Wikipedia-based Corpora for Question Answering   
> 
> 
> If you have anyquestion about the format or process feel free to get in touch 
> off-list.
> 
> Masssly, TilmanBayer and Dario Taraborelli
> 
> [1]http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
> 
> ___
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

[Heather Ford]

Hi Max :)

Thanks for adding your name to the review! Not quite sure I understand your
question about other wiki sites that we could emulate? The research
newsletter is pretty much single author per review so it's not really done
in a 'wiki way' (e.g. by many authors producing a single review) other than
using wiki software so I don't think anything is needed other than simply
adding the byline next to the headline of the review as well as to at the
top of the newsletter as per current practice.

I'm thinking that these bylines wouldn't be needed for the snippets but
rather for the more significant reviews.

What do you think?

Or were you asking about other methods of actually producing the signpost?

Heather Ford
Oxford Internet Institute http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk Doctoral Programme
EthnographyMatters http://ethnographymatters.net | Oxford Digital
Ethnography Group http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=115
http://hblog.org | @hfordsa http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa




On 25 February 2014 20:35, Klein,Max kle...@oclc.org wrote:

 Great idea Heather,

 I will add my name to my review. Do you know any other review sites that
 aggregate in a wiki way that we could emulate?

 Maximilian Klein
 Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
 +17074787023

 
 From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org 
 wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of Tilman Bayer 
 tba...@wikimedia.org
 Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:16 AM
 To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
 Cc: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an
   interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
 Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers
 open for review

 Hi Heather,

 that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something
 like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently
 displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost
 and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version
 histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution
 easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with
 many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a
 suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue,
 let's follow up offlist if more information is needed.

 On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford hfor...@gmail.com wrote:
  Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
 
  I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer
 names/usernames
  to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
  paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting
 some
  very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
  summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily
 (although
  I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social
 science
  research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
  comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
 
  Best,
  Heather.
 
  Heather Ford
  Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
  EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
  http://hblog.org | @hfordsa
 
 
 
 
  On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 
  Hi Max,
 
  yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
  is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
  is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
  take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
  up to review the Editor's Biases paper, I'm looking forward to
  reading your summary!
 
  On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max kle...@oclc.org wrote:
   Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into
 the
   signpost in time. 25th?
  
   Maximilian Klein
   Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
   +17074787023
  
   
   From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
   wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of Dario
 Taraborelli
   dtarabore...@wikimedia.org
   Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
   To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
   an   interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
   content and communities
   Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers
 open
   forreview
  
   Hi everybody,
  
   with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
   have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the
 Research
   Newsletter [1]
  
   Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
   add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As
 usual,
   short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
  
   Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
   experimenting

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

[Heather Ford]

Thanks, Dario, Tilman!

I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames
to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some
very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although
I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social
science research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have
these comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others
think...

Best,
Heather.

Heather Ford
Oxford Internet Institute http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk Doctoral Programme
EthnographyMatters http://ethnographymatters.net | Oxford Digital
Ethnography Group http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=115
http://hblog.org | @hfordsa http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa




On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hi Max,

 yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
 is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
 is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
 take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
 up to review the Editor's Biases paper, I'm looking forward to
 reading your summary!

 On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max kle...@oclc.org wrote:
  Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the
 signpost in time. 25th?
 
  Maximilian Klein
  Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
  +17074787023
 
  
  From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org 
 wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of Dario
 Taraborelli dtarabore...@wikimedia.org
  Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
  To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
 an   interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
 content and communities
  Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open
 forreview
 
  Hi everybody,
 
  with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
 have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research
 Newsletter [1]
 
  Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
 add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual,
 short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
 
  Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
 experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l
 and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process
 feel free to get in touch off-list.
 
  Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
 
  [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
  ___
  Wiki-research-l mailing list
  Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
 
 
  ___
  Wiki-research-l mailing list
  Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l



 --
 Tilman Bayer
 Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
 Wikimedia Foundation
 IRC (Freenode): HaeB

 ___
 Wiki-research-l mailing list
 Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

[Tilman Bayer]

Hi Heather,

that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something
like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently
displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost
and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version
histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution
easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with
many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a
suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue,
let's follow up offlist if more information is needed.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford hfor...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks, Dario, Tilman!

 I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames
 to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
 paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some
 very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
 summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although
 I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science
 research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
 comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...

 Best,
 Heather.

 Heather Ford
 Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
 EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
 http://hblog.org | @hfordsa




 On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hi Max,

 yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
 is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
 is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
 take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
 up to review the Editor's Biases paper, I'm looking forward to
 reading your summary!

 On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max kle...@oclc.org wrote:
  Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the
  signpost in time. 25th?
 
  Maximilian Klein
  Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
  +17074787023
 
  
  From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
  wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of Dario 
  Taraborelli
  dtarabore...@wikimedia.org
  Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
  To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
  an   interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
  content and communities
  Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open
  forreview
 
  Hi everybody,
 
  with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
  have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research
  Newsletter [1]
 
  Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
  add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual,
  short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
 
  Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
  experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l 
  and
  wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel
  free to get in touch off-list.
 
  Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
 
  [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
  ___
  Wiki-research-l mailing list
  Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
 
 
  ___
  Wiki-research-l mailing list
  Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l



 --
 Tilman Bayer
 Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
 Wikimedia Foundation
 IRC (Freenode): HaeB

 ___
 Wiki-research-l mailing list
 Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l



 ___
 Wiki-research-l mailing list
 Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l




-- 
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

[Klein,Max]

Great idea Heather,

I will add my name to my review. Do you know any other review sites that 
aggregate in a wiki way that we could emulate?

Maximilian Klein
Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
+17074787023


From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org 
wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of Tilman Bayer 
tba...@wikimedia.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:16 AM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Cc: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an   
interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open 
for review

Hi Heather,

that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something
like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently
displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost
and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version
histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution
easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with
many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a
suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue,
let's follow up offlist if more information is needed.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford hfor...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks, Dario, Tilman!

 I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames
 to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
 paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some
 very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
 summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although
 I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science
 research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
 comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...

 Best,
 Heather.

 Heather Ford
 Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
 EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
 http://hblog.org | @hfordsa




 On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hi Max,

 yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
 is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
 is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
 take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
 up to review the Editor's Biases paper, I'm looking forward to
 reading your summary!

 On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max kle...@oclc.org wrote:
  Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the
  signpost in time. 25th?
 
  Maximilian Klein
  Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
  +17074787023
 
  
  From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
  wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of Dario 
  Taraborelli
  dtarabore...@wikimedia.org
  Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
  To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
  an   interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
  content and communities
  Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open
  forreview
 
  Hi everybody,
 
  with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
  have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research
  Newsletter [1]
 
  Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
  add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual,
  short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
 
  Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
  experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l 
  and
  wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel
  free to get in touch off-list.
 
  Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
 
  [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
  ___
  Wiki-research-l mailing list
  Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
 
 
  ___
  Wiki-research-l mailing list
  Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l



 --
 Tilman Bayer
 Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
 Wikimedia Foundation
 IRC (Freenode): HaeB

 ___
 Wiki-research-l mailing list
 Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l



 ___
 Wiki-research-l mailing list
 Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l




--
Tilman Bayer
Senior

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

[Juliana Bastos Marques]

Do you publish on papers in languages other than English?

Juliana.


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hi Heather,

 that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something
 like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently
 displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost
 and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version
 histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution
 easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with
 many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a
 suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue,
 let's follow up offlist if more information is needed.

 On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford hfor...@gmail.com wrote:
  Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
 
  I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer
 names/usernames
  to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
  paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting
 some
  very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
  summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily
 (although
  I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social
 science
  research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
  comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
 
  Best,
  Heather.
 
  Heather Ford
  Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
  EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
  http://hblog.org | @hfordsa
 
 
 
 
  On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 
  Hi Max,
 
  yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
  is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
  is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
  take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
  up to review the Editor's Biases paper, I'm looking forward to
  reading your summary!
 
  On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max kle...@oclc.org wrote:
   Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into
 the
   signpost in time. 25th?
  
   Maximilian Klein
   Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
   +17074787023
  
   
   From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
   wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of Dario
 Taraborelli
   dtarabore...@wikimedia.org
   Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
   To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
   an   interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
   content and communities
   Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers
 open
   forreview
  
   Hi everybody,
  
   with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
   have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the
 Research
   Newsletter [1]
  
   Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
   add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As
 usual,
   short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
  
   Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
   experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to
 analytics-l and
   wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process
 feel
   free to get in touch off-list.
  
   Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
  
   [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
   ___
   Wiki-research-l mailing list
   Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
   https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
  
  
   ___
   Wiki-research-l mailing list
   Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
   https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
 
 
 
  --
  Tilman Bayer
  Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
  Wikimedia Foundation
  IRC (Freenode): HaeB
 
  ___
  Wiki-research-l mailing list
  Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
 
 
 
  ___
  Wiki-research-l mailing list
  Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
 



 --
 Tilman Bayer
 Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
 Wikimedia Foundation
 IRC (Freenode): HaeB

 ___
 Wiki-research-l mailing list
 Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l




-- 
www.domusaurea.org
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

[Klein,Max]

Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the 
signpost in time. 25th?

Maximilian Klein
Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
+17074787023


From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org 
wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of Dario Taraborelli 
dtarabore...@wikimedia.org
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an   
interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia content and 
communities
Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for
review

Hi everybody,

with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we have a 
good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter 
[1]

Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and add your 
name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes 
and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.

Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we’re experimenting 
with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. 
if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch 
off-list.

Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer

[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l