Thanks, Dario, Tilman! I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
Best, Heather. Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk> Doctoral Programme EthnographyMatters <http://ethnographymatters.net> | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=115> http://hblog.org | @hfordsa <http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa> On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Max, > > yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline > is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date > is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might > take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing > up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to > reading your summary! > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the > signpost in time. 25th? > > > > Maximilian Klein > > Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC > > +17074787023 > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: [email protected] < > [email protected]> on behalf of Dario > Taraborelli <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM > > To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has > an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia > content and communities > > Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open > for review > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we > have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research > Newsletter [1] > > > > Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and > add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, > short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome. > > > > Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're > experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l > and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process > feel free to get in touch off-list. > > > > Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer > > > > [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter > > _______________________________________________ > > Wiki-research-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wiki-research-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > > > -- > Tilman Bayer > Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) > Wikimedia Foundation > IRC (Freenode): HaeB > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l >
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
