https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Nux e...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
--- Comment #66 from Nux
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #68 from Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com 2012-03-05 18:49:27 UTC ---
The two main feature requests that were discussed here are implemented:
* Ability to load a module[1] from a top queue that is blocking
* Asynchronous loading of the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Nux e...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
--- Comment #62 from Nux
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
mybugs.m...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mybugs.m...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Nux e...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
--- Comment #64 from Nux
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
mybugs.m...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||34958
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
mybugs.m...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #65 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #61 from Nux e...@wp.pl 2012-03-03 10:55:16 UTC ---
Where can I find infromation on this head-async loading? How do I load two
scripts from User space in order?
I'm asking because this was not working in 1.18 and it seems to be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Mark A. Hershberger john.n...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Bugmeister Bot mhershber...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #59 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2012-01-05 23:35:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #58)
This currently means:
* 'top': document.write in head
* 'bottom': appendChild to body from bottom of body
Which we could
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Tim Starling tim.starl...@rocketmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Happy-melon happy.melon.w...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #58 from Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com 2011-08-24 23:21:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #57)
[add] some library [that] would enable script developers to load their
scripts either
before end of head (sequentially) or in paralel
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #57 from Nux e...@wp.pl 2011-08-16 20:23:46 UTC ---
I think you should simple move everything to top and add some library (even
very simple) that would enable script developers to load their scripts either
before end of head
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #56 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2011-08-13 09:30:15
UTC ---
An interesting technique is used by HeadJS, a script I was made aware of by
some Australian guy in the audience of our OSCON presentation about
ResourceLoader
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #55 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2011-07-18 18:00:13
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #54)
Where can I hardcode that user scripts should load on top? This is so annoying
:(
You can't yet, but we'll probably end up moving
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #54 from Subfader subfa...@gmail.com 2011-07-17 17:04:32 UTC ---
Where can I hardcode that user scripts should load on top? This is so annoying
:(
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #53 from Nux e...@wp.pl 2011-07-07 07:52:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #52)
(In reply to comment #51)
Wait i'm messing things up here:
Scripts in head load sequentially. Scripts dynamically added to head load
async in
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Derk-Jan Hartman hart...@videolan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #52 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 19:18:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #51)
Wait i'm messing things up here:
Scripts in head load sequentially. Scripts dynamically added to head load
async in Firefox
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #39 from Subfader subfa...@gmail.com 2011-07-03 17:11:50 UTC ---
Major bug for me. Cannot upgrade this way. No dev cares anout a solution?
Simply include user JS can MediaWiki:Common.js at the top. Where's the
problem?!
Cannot
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #40 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2011-07-03 18:32:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #39)
Simply include user JS can MediaWiki:Common.js at the top. Where's the
problem?!
All other scripts have to be loaded before site
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #41 from Subfader subfa...@gmail.com 2011-07-03 18:41:15 UTC ---
All other scripts have to be loaded before site and user scripts, for
backwards compatibility
The world was ok in 1.16. Best backwards compatibility = when you cannot
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #42 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2011-07-03 18:42:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)
Someone said that with RL it was to be expected that things break and that
users should fix their JS.
How to fix it?
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #43 from Nux e...@wp.pl 2011-07-03 23:26:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #40)
(In reply to comment #39)
Simply include user JS can MediaWiki:Common.js at the top. Where's the
problem?!
All other scripts have to be loaded
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #44 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2011-07-03 23:28:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #43)
It would be much better if you would implement parallel but ordered loading
technique (adding script tag with JS) and move all
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #45 from Hans Adler johannes.aqu...@googlemail.com 2011-07-03
23:45:45 UTC ---
Am I getting this right? The only 'advantage' of loading the scripts later is
that a preliminary page appears earlier? But that's not a feature, it's a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #46 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2011-07-03 23:56:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #45)
Am I getting this right? The only 'advantage' of loading the scripts later is
that a preliminary page appears earlier? But that's
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #47 from Hans Adler johannes.aqu...@googlemail.com 2011-07-04
00:12:10 UTC ---
OK. Sorry for venting my frustration.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #48 from Nux e...@wp.pl 2011-07-04 00:20:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #44)
(In reply to comment #43)
It would be much better if you would implement parallel but ordered loading
technique (adding script tag with JS) and move
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Nux e...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Nux e...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #32 from Nux e...@wp.pl 2011-04-12 18:10:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
If you need to for example insert a link in a dropdown menu your script should
NOT load in the head as that dropdown menu will not exist at this point.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #33 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2011-04-12 18:38:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
This again is not exactly true. I do need to insert the link as soon as the
page is ready, BUT I also need to do it as soon as
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Lowest |Normal
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #29 from Happy-melon happy.melon.w...@gmail.com 2011-04-11
15:38:48 UTC ---
I'm certainly not saying it's not a problem or that it doesn't need fixing;
only that it shouldn't be fixed in the way Nux suggested it should.
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #30 from Nux e...@wp.pl 2011-04-11 20:54:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
(In reply to comment #26)
(In reply to comment #25)
Site JS and user JS should be at top. Users and site administrators load
libraries in their
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
--- Comment #31 from Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com 2011-04-11 22:17:54 UTC ---
Just so you know, the issue is in BugZilla and it's known to the developers.
The following solution are proposed and/or will be implemented, please be
patient while
43 matches
Mail list logo
