https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44465
--- Comment #6 from Kelson [Emmanuel Engelhart] kel...@kiwix.org ---
Thank you Erik for your feedback, although this of course not what I was
hoping.
The workaround with the Mediawiki wiki is a valid one, but I prefer not to
devaluate
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44465
Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44465
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ops
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44465
Sam Reed (reedy) s...@reedyboy.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@reedyboy.net,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44465
--- Comment #1 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org ---
Before anybody potentially proceeds on the technical site of this request:
It needs to be clear and documented that planning and legal parts between
involved parties have been sorted
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44465
Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@wikimedia.org,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44465
--- Comment #3 from Kelson [Emmanuel Engelhart] kel...@kiwix.org ---
@Erik
* We need a simple Mediawiki with nothing special, no custom extension.
* About HTTPS, if the WMF needs absolutely a valid certificate, I can have a
look to this
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44465
--- Comment #4 from Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org ---
Hi Emmanuel,
my suggestion to you would be to subsume the content in openzim.org under
mediawiki.org. All other Wikimedia-related tech projects either have their own
self-hosted sites or
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44465
MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@mzmcbride.com
--
