Jalexander added a comment.
! In T607#14817, @Qgil wrote:
@Jalexander, @LuisV_WMF and I have agreed that {T783} goes first.
Aye, just to clarify for later though: The list is probably still a blocker for
us to roll out though (the 1000+ people coming in at the start are just too
much for us
Qgil added a comment.
Thank you all for your thoughts and the illustrative patch. I spoke with
@Jalexander a few hours ago, and we exchanged impressions about our respective
top priorities. The further comments here are very helpful.
A summary that hopefully all we can agree on:
* The
mmodell added a comment.
Here's what the mediawiki user field looks like in advanced search on my local
test phabricator:
{F219}
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T607
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign
mmodell added a comment.
I did this before. It's an ugly hack and I'd rather not maintain it but it
isn't hard to do:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/147723/
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T607
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim,
Jalexander added a comment.
Could you expand on what you don't understand about the use cases and what, in
your opinion, the UI compromises could be? To be honest I feel like I've
explained it a few times in both the previous task(s) and in past meetings and
so I want to ensure that I don't
mmodell added a comment.
One thing I can do, at least it doesn't look very difficult at first glance, is
to enable 'advanced search' on the wiki username field. That would not involve
any hacks or long term maintenance issues, at least in the sense that it would
be isolated to an extension
Jalexander added a comment.
! In T607#10078, @mmodell wrote:
One thing I can do, at least it doesn't look very difficult at first glance,
is to enable 'advanced search' on the wiki username field. That would not
involve any hacks or long term maintenance issues, at least in the sense that
mmodell added a comment.
@chasemp @qgil When @jalexander says he's explained it a few times in previous
tasks and meetings, he's referring to T258 and it's been pretty clear that they
want specifically to have the wiki username in the list, just like this task is
requesting.
@chasemp: I'm
chasemp added a comment.
@Jalexander, really I think you have explained yourself well, but their has
been a meager amount of time on our side to address it and translate into the
best possible technical terms. I'm genuinely sorry that has sucked. I think
the last few comments here have been
Jalexander added a comment.
! In T607#10082, @chasemp wrote:
@Jalexander, really I think you have explained yourself well, but their has
been a meager amount of time on our side to address it and translate into the
best possible technical terms. I'm genuinely sorry that has sucked. I think
10 matches
Mail list logo