[Maniphest] [Commented On] T607: Check easily who has signed Legalpad documents by their Wikimedia username

2014-10-24 Thread Jalexander
Jalexander added a comment. ! In T607#14817, @Qgil wrote: @Jalexander, @LuisV_WMF and I have agreed that {T783} goes first. Aye, just to clarify for later though: The list is probably still a blocker for us to roll out though (the 1000+ people coming in at the start are just too much for us

[Maniphest] [Commented On] T607: Check easily who has signed Legalpad documents by their Wikimedia username

2014-10-10 Thread Qgil
Qgil added a comment. Thank you all for your thoughts and the illustrative patch. I spoke with @Jalexander a few hours ago, and we exchanged impressions about our respective top priorities. The further comments here are very helpful. A summary that hopefully all we can agree on: * The

[Maniphest] [Commented On] T607: Check easily who has signed Legalpad documents by their Wikimedia username

2014-10-10 Thread mmodell
mmodell added a comment. Here's what the mediawiki user field looks like in advanced search on my local test phabricator: {F219} TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T607 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign

[Maniphest] [Commented On] T607: Check easily who has signed Legalpad documents by their Wikimedia username

2014-10-09 Thread mmodell
mmodell added a comment. I did this before. It's an ugly hack and I'd rather not maintain it but it isn't hard to do: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/147723/ TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T607 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim,

[Maniphest] [Commented On] T607: Check easily who has signed Legalpad documents by their Wikimedia username

2014-10-09 Thread Jalexander
Jalexander added a comment. Could you expand on what you don't understand about the use cases and what, in your opinion, the UI compromises could be? To be honest I feel like I've explained it a few times in both the previous task(s) and in past meetings and so I want to ensure that I don't

[Maniphest] [Commented On] T607: Check easily who has signed Legalpad documents by their Wikimedia username

2014-10-09 Thread mmodell
mmodell added a comment. One thing I can do, at least it doesn't look very difficult at first glance, is to enable 'advanced search' on the wiki username field. That would not involve any hacks or long term maintenance issues, at least in the sense that it would be isolated to an extension

[Maniphest] [Commented On] T607: Check easily who has signed Legalpad documents by their Wikimedia username

2014-10-09 Thread Jalexander
Jalexander added a comment. ! In T607#10078, @mmodell wrote: One thing I can do, at least it doesn't look very difficult at first glance, is to enable 'advanced search' on the wiki username field. That would not involve any hacks or long term maintenance issues, at least in the sense that

[Maniphest] [Commented On] T607: Check easily who has signed Legalpad documents by their Wikimedia username

2014-10-09 Thread mmodell
mmodell added a comment. @chasemp @qgil When @jalexander says he's explained it a few times in previous tasks and meetings, he's referring to T258 and it's been pretty clear that they want specifically to have the wiki username in the list, just like this task is requesting. @chasemp: I'm

[Maniphest] [Commented On] T607: Check easily who has signed Legalpad documents by their Wikimedia username

2014-10-09 Thread chasemp
chasemp added a comment. @Jalexander, really I think you have explained yourself well, but their has been a meager amount of time on our side to address it and translate into the best possible technical terms. I'm genuinely sorry that has sucked. I think the last few comments here have been

[Maniphest] [Commented On] T607: Check easily who has signed Legalpad documents by their Wikimedia username

2014-10-09 Thread Jalexander
Jalexander added a comment. ! In T607#10082, @chasemp wrote: @Jalexander, really I think you have explained yourself well, but their has been a meager amount of time on our side to address it and translate into the best possible technical terms. I'm genuinely sorry that has sucked. I think