https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26716
--- Comment #7 from jason brown edit...@journalismcrisis.org 2011-01-16
10:20:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Yes, a link to http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:External_editors from the
default [[mediawiki:tog-externaleditor]] and
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26716
--- Comment #5 from jason brown edit...@journalismcrisis.org 2011-01-16
00:04:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Be good to get some stats on how widely used it is.
Absolutely. Exactly what I was suggesting to Prodego. No idea how such
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26716
--- Comment #6 from Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com 2011-01-16 04:02:27 UTC ---
Yes, a link to http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:External_editors from the
default [[mediawiki:tog-externaleditor]] and [[mediawiki:tog-externaldiff]]
should be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26716
--- Comment #4 from Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com 2011-01-14 22:52:54 UTC ---
I wonder how often people (correctly) use that preference. I believe that the
majority of people who use external editors, use it for images. I wonder if
people who
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26716
Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bawolff...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26716
--- Comment #3 from jason brown edit...@journalismcrisis.org 2011-01-14
04:18:04 UTC ---
Thanks very much for the quick response. Answers following your points, in
quotes, as follows.
Well it does say for experts only. Basically what it does