https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #25 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org ---
billinghurst / John Mark / Trijnstel:
Could you answer comment 24, please?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #26 from billinghurst billinghu...@gmail.com ---
I thought that was rhetorical. I am comfortable to see changes at work, and it
is one that I have only tripped over once, so not one in which I am an expert.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tstarl...@wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Daniel Friesen mediawiki-b...@nadir-seen-fire.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #20 from billinghurst billinghu...@gmail.com ---
That would probably suffice as long as there was an easy means to collect all
the hits in the abusefilter, so the OS can review and then select those that
should be culled. Doing one
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #21 from Trijnstel trijns...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #17)
The user attempted to save the page at 13:02:56, and received a warning.
Then
s/he clicked save again, and saved successfully
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #22 from James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #21)
(In reply to comment #19)
Perhaps we could automatically add a note on action=revisiondelete saying
that there are AbuseFilter entries for a page
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #23 from Trijnstel trijns...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #22)
(In reply to comment #21)
(In reply to comment #19)
Perhaps we could automatically add a note on action=revisiondelete saying
that there are AbuseFilter
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|agarr...@wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #17 from Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Confirmed. One edit was revdel'd and then later suppressed at nlwiki. It
had
tripped and that resulted in 8 (2x4) logged filter additions that needed
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #18 from Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Just removing the summary condition should fix that part of it.
I94321905f38eafde8add00eff73745af255c1f15
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Trijnstel trijns...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trijns...@hotmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Trijnstel trijns...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Marius Hoch h...@online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@online.de
--
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
billinghurst billinghu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #10 from Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com 2012-01-12
18:33:23 UTC ---
So I asked an oversighter who knows about this bug to justify why it should be
a higher priority, speaking from their experience:
As it stands, when an
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Normal |Highest
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Highest |High
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|bugsmash|platformeng
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Highest |Normal
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #9 from Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org 2012-01-04
00:42:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Bumping back to normal priority. Mark, let's talk about the correct priority
for this?
Yeah, highest was probably over-the-top.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Normal |Lowest
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org 2011-05-22 08:07:59
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
This could be more easily implemented once bug 18374 is solved.
Well, not quite. They would both be made easier by a particular
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org 2011-05-21 14:44:14
UTC ---
For now this is probably in the patches welcome category.
What would be necessary would be to hook the revision deleted event, and,
when that occurs, find
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #5 from John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com 2011-05-22 02:38:09
UTC ---
This could be more easily implemented once bug 18374 is solved.
Also, I was wrong about AbuseFilter 'visibility' being unnecessary once this
bug is solved,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bugsmash
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #2 from John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com 2011-04-21 21:08:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Is this related to why I can't see the contents of the page you
mention in Bug #28632 even though you have undeleted it?
No.
--
36 matches
Mail list logo
