https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51662
Siebrand s.mazel...@xs4all.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Low
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51662
--- Comment #4 from Michael M. listenle...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
In my opinion adding such classes to ULS would entail quite a maintenance
burden.
Somebody has to maintain the classes/templates/whatever, to keep them up to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51662
--- Comment #3 from Niklas Laxström niklas.laxst...@gmail.com ---
Isn't the wiki way to write a template ala {{script-buginese|Text goes here}}?
That way the communities themselves can also decide which font they want to use
without us
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51662
--- Comment #1 from Siebrand s.mazel...@xs4all.nl ---
i think this satisfies your requirement. It's documented on
[[mw:Extension:Universal_Language_Selector#Alternate_ways_to_load_fonts]]:
Alternate ways to load fonts, By specifying
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51662
--- Comment #2 from Michael M. listenle...@gmail.com ---
There are some advantages the classes have:
* They are more descriptive. span class=script-buginesesome text/span is
more obvious than span style=font-family: Saweri, sans-serif;some
