[Bug 68425] Tooltips for Insert - Special Character
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68425 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||68429 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 68425] Tooltips for Insert - Special Character
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68425 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Daniel Naber from comment #0) There are at least two dash-like characters in the Special character dialog. They should have a tooltip describing them, otherwise it won't be obvious to most users which character is to be used in which situation. Assuming you refer to − and — : Don't use and situations highly depend on cultures (and languages) anyway? Wondering if it would be possible to generally explain at all. Any citation for won't be obvious to most users? (In reply to Daniel Naber from comment #0) Actually, why not add a descriptive tooltip to all special characters? I doubt there is a usecase for explaining every single character (and making translators translate them). Which actual problem to solve? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 68425] Tooltips for Insert - Special Character
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68425 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rm...@wikimedia.org, ||tpars...@wikimedia.org Component|General |Editing Tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 68425] Tooltips for Insert - Special Character
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68425 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Naber misc2...@danielnaber.de --- (In reply to Andre Klapper from comment #1) Assuming you refer to − and — : Don't use and situations highly depend on cultures (and languages) anyway? I guess so (and that's probably why de.wikipedia has a different dialog than en.wikipedia), but still these characters have names that at least help explain their meaning and make it possible to tell them apart. Any citation for won't be obvious to most users? I've fixed about 2000 typos in de.wikipedia in the last few months and typographical problems (although not limited to the dash characters) are very common. I doubt there is a usecase for explaining every single character (and making translators translate them). Which actual problem to solve? It increases confidence in what you're doing if you can see that you are actually using the right character (instead of one that maybe just looks the same - this could easily happen with then tens of thousands of unicode characters available). For translation, either use the Unicode name without translation, or an official translation (that might be available or not). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
