https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
C. Scott Ananian canan...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stv...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #28 from Rezonansowy lukas.ce...@gmail.com ---
This bug is here since 2006. We have solution, we have approval. Can someone
implement it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #25 from Rezonansowy lukas.ce...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #24)
The magic of wikitext; once we have a server side solution, this template can
just be updated to call that. Likewise with some of the other templates that
do
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #26 from Rezonansowy lukas.ce...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #25)
(In reply to comment #24)
The magic of wikitext; once we have a server side solution, this template
can
just be updated to call that. Likewise with some
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #27 from Michael Dale md...@wikimedia.org ---
your solution looks good. I was just commenting that once that is implemented,
the respective templates could call your code, this way any usage of said
template will be seamlessly
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Rezonansowy lukas.ce...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #22 from Rezonansowy lukas.ce...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
Chiming in here... instead of server-side cropping, the same effect can be
achieved with CSS overflow/positioning. Downside is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #23 from Rezonansowy lukas.ce...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
Chiming in here... instead of server-side cropping, the same effect can be
achieved with CSS overflow/positioning. Downside is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #24 from Michael Dale md...@wikimedia.org ---
The magic of wikitext; once we have a server side solution, this template can
just be updated to call that. Likewise with some of the other templates that do
similar things.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Zil vers...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vers...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Dereckson dereck...@espace-win.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||37883
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Sumana Harihareswara suma...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|need-parsertest, patch, |
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Sumana Harihareswara suma...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2964|0 |1
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Dereckson dereck...@espace-win.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|ne...@wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|High|Normal
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Erwin Dokter er...@darcoury.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@darcoury.nl
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #16 from Michael Dale d...@ucsc.edu 2012-01-03 18:46:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Chiming in here... instead of server-side cropping, the same effect can be
achieved with CSS overflow/positioning. Downside is that the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #14 from timothyaus...@yahoo.com 2011-12-05 08:26:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I'd much rather we move towards limiting the number of rendered variants we
have, not increase them... IMO cropping would be better served with
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Jeff G. rsyqfiojg...@spammotel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
STyx s...@neuf.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@neuf.fr
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
STyx s...@neuf.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Normal |High
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #12 from STyx s...@neuf.fr 2010-05-13 13:32:54 UTC ---
See also http://www.imagemagick.org/www/command-line-processing.html#geometry
Therefore
[[File:Image.jpg|400px|Crop=47.57%x77.687%+30.43%+22.423%]]
is a more standard syntax
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
--- Comment #9 from Guillaume Paumier gpaum...@wikimedia.org 2009-12-30
20:51:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
IMO cropping would be better served with an
interface allowing for explicit, visible cropping which creates either a new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Michael Dale d...@ucsc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@ucsc.edu
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
Bryan Tong Minh bryan.tongm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
29 matches
Mail list logo
