https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
--- Comment #24 from pamdavi...@yahoo.co.uk ---
(In reply to Trevor Parscal from comment #22)
> I would like to avoid adding moving and resizing to dialogs, because I
> believe it solving the problem in the wrong way. At it's root, this is a
> w
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
--- Comment #23 from Juan de Vojníkov ---
(In reply to Trevor Parscal from comment #22)
> I would like to avoid adding moving and resizing to dialogs, because I
> believe it solving the problem in the wrong way. At it's root, this is a
> workfl
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
--- Comment #22 from Trevor Parscal ---
I would like to avoid adding moving and resizing to dialogs, because I believe
it solving the problem in the wrong way. At it's root, this is a workflow
problem. Making the dialog resizable and movable do
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low |Normal
Assignee|jforrester
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
--- Comment #21 from WhatamIdoing ---
> You can't edit anything, tables, Chinese or galleries,
> if there is big immovable box in the way.
This isn't really true: you can close the box. With the box open (and
movable), you can *see* the con
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
--- Comment #20 from Spinningspark ---
(In reply to James Forrester from comment #18)
> (In reply to Spinningspark from comment #17)
> > Why is this languishing at low priority? Fixing something that is preventing
> > the editor from reading th
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
--- Comment #19 from John Broughton ---
Just to be clear, this is a DESIGN TEAM problem, because it's a problem with
the OOjs UI, which VE uses, but which is under the control of the Design team.
The issue is that the OOjs UI WindowManager lack
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
--- Comment #18 from James Forrester ---
(In reply to Spinningspark from comment #17)
> Why is this languishing at low priority? Fixing something that is preventing
> the editor from reading the thing he is editing is HIGH priority.
"High" pri
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
Spinningspark changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spinningspark.w...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juandevojni...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia. |jforrester+veteambztickets@
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49969
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Editing Tools |General
Assignee|rm...@wik
12 matches
Mail list logo
