https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #21 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
From [[mail:analytics]]: We also finished a numbers of unplanned tasks: [...]
User Agent discussions (EventLogging). Any published notes/recap?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #22 from nuria nu...@wikimedia.org ---
We have hired a hard working Product Manager for analytics that is getting up
to speed on the issue regarding User Agents and Privacy. He shall be publishing
documentation once he's had time to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |NEW
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|EventLogging|EventLogging
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #15 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Nemo – I started adding some details on the sanitization logic (expanding on
Nuria's draft) here:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
nuria nu...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nu...@wikimedia.org
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #17 from nuria nu...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
This is about logging it by default, which is possible, but not required for
bug 56575.
Yes, sub-sampling would definitely be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #18 from nuria nu...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Nemo – I started adding some details on the sanitization logic (expanding on
Nuria's draft) here:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/EventLogging/UserAgentAnonymization
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Dario Taraborelli dtarabore...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||59832
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #13 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 102817 merged by Ottomata:
Add user-agent header to the format spec of EventLogging's varnishncsa instance
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/102817
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #14 from Dario Taraborelli dtarabore...@wikimedia.org ---
Nemo – I started adding some details on the sanitization logic (expanding on
Nuria's draft) here:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/EventLogging/UserAgentAnonymization
This is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #12 from Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Or maybe the bucketing
mentioned above has the same results, is the implementation mentioned in
comment 4 described somewhere and/or the place where
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||analytics
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 102817 had a related patch set uploaded by Ori.livneh:
Add user-agent header to the format spec of EventLogging's varnishncsa instance
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #8 from Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Change 102817 had a related patch set uploaded by Ori.livneh:
Add user-agent header to the format spec of EventLogging's varnishncsa
instance
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #9 from Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Will this make it possible to get statistics of browsers used for logged-in
requests as discussed in
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #10 from Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #9)
This is about logging it by default, which is possible, but not required for
bug 56575.
Yes, sub-sampling would definitely be sufficient to get a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #6 from Dario Taraborelli dtarabore...@wikimedia.org ---
We also have new use cases from VE (estimating how many new registered users
have VE-capable browsers)and MultiMedia (see
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@uberbox.org
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #4 from Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org ---
Only the sanitation part has been implemented, given the smaller scope of
usefulness for Tool Labs (where debugging against specific versions is less of
an issue). I was planning to
23 matches
Mail list logo
