https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #22 from nuria ---
We have hired a hard working Product Manager for analytics that is getting up
to speed on the issue regarding User Agents and Privacy. He shall be publishing
documentation once he's had time to catch up.
--
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #21 from Nemo ---
From [[mail:analytics]]: "We also finished a numbers of unplanned tasks: [...]
User Agent discussions (EventLogging)". Any published notes/recap?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|EventLogging|EventLogging
Assignee|o...@w
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |NEW
--- Comment #19 from Andre Klapper
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Dario Taraborelli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||59832
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #18 from nuria ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Nemo – I started adding some details on the sanitization logic (expanding on
> Nuria's draft) here:
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/EventLogging/UserAgentAnonymization
>
> This is st
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #17 from nuria ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > This is about logging it by default, which is possible, but not required for
> > bug 56575.
>
> Yes, sub-sampling would definitely be sufficient to get a r
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
nuria changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nu...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment #16 from nuria
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #15 from Nemo ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Nemo – I started adding some details on the sanitization logic (expanding on
> Nuria's draft) here:
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/EventLogging/UserAgentAnonymization
>
> This is sti
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #14 from Dario Taraborelli ---
Nemo – I started adding some details on the sanitization logic (expanding on
Nuria's draft) here:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/EventLogging/UserAgentAnonymization
This is still a draft, we will add
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #13 from Gerrit Notification Bot ---
Change 102817 merged by Ottomata:
Add user-agent header to the format spec of EventLogging's varnishncsa instance
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/102817
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #12 from Matthew Flaschen ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Or maybe the bucketing
> mentioned above has the same results, is the implementation mentioned in
> comment 4 described somewhere and/or the place where logs go documented (t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||analytics
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #10 from Gabriel Wicke ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> This is about logging it by default, which is possible, but not required for
> bug 56575.
Yes, sub-sampling would definitely be sufficient to get a representative
sample. For th
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #9 from Matthew Flaschen ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Will this make it possible to get statistics of browsers used for logged-in
> requests as discussed in
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 ?
Bug 56575 is al
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #8 from Gabriel Wicke ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Change 102817 had a related patch set uploaded by Ori.livneh:
> Add user-agent header to the format spec of EventLogging's varnishncsa
> instance
>
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Notification Bot ---
Change 102817 had a related patch set uploaded by Ori.livneh:
Add user-agent header to the format spec of EventLogging's varnishncsa instance
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/102817
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Gerrit Notification Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |PATCH_TO_REVIEW
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #6 from Dario Taraborelli ---
We also have new use cases from VE (estimating how many new registered users
have VE-capable browsers)and MultiMedia (see
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Schema:MediaViewerPerf) that would benefit from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Oliver Keyes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oke...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment #5 fro
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Ori Livneh changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.wikimedia.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #4 from Marc A. Pelletier ---
Only the sanitation part has been implemented, given the smaller scope of
usefulness for Tool Labs (where debugging against specific versions is less of
an issue). I was planning to use DevCamp as an o
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
Luis Villa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@uberbox.org
--- Comment #3 from Luis
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #2 from Dario Taraborelli ---
Instead of logging the full, unparsed UA string we match it against a list of
the N most popular browser/agents and log everything else as "other".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52295
--- Comment #1 from Steven Walling ---
Can you expand on what "sanitized" means for user agents?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing li
25 matches
Mail list logo
