https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #90 from Nemo ---
Thanks
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #89 from Bartosz Dziewoński ---
(In reply to comment #87)
> (In reply to comment #86)
> > With the tofu detection that recently added into ULS, users no longer see
> > degradation of text quality for fonts they have. I think that ad
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #88 from Bartosz Dziewoński ---
(In reply to comment #87)
> (In reply to comment #86)
> > With the tofu detection that recently added into ULS, users no longer see
> > degradation of text quality for fonts they have. I think that ad
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #87 from Nemo ---
(In reply to comment #82)
> This bug cannot be marked "fixed" but should become a tracker, [...]
But the tracked bugs are on another bug tracker; that's the difficulty.
(In reply to comment #86)
> With the tofu d
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Niklas Laxström changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
MZMcBride changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #84 from Eduard Braun ---
I'd also reopen this bug. Only because ULS can be switched off now does not
mean it will not be used by people who find it useful. Additionally I could
personally imagine the default state of the newly crea
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #83 from Peter Bowman ---
(In reply to comment #82)
> I also agree that forcing ULS completely off is a bad situation. At least it
> should remain as an optional gadget in user preferences, possibly in the Beta
> preferences...
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #82 from Philippe Verdy ---
I also agree that forcing ULS completely off is a bad situation. At least it
should remain as an optional gadget in user preferences, possibly in the Beta
preferences.
I really love the possibility of sw
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #81 from Raimond Spekking ---
Now that ULS is disabled by default the usage of webfonts is totally broken:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Raymond/Webfonts :-(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee fo
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #80 from Nemo ---
(In reply to comment #79)
> This still applies if somebody chooses to enable ULS. I suggest reopening.
Indeed we don't know what was the rationale for bug 46306, but I suppose it was
that one will just disable ULS
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #79 from Bartosz Dziewoński ---
This still applies if somebody chooses to enable ULS. I suggest reopening.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||upstream
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||56292
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/santhosh
|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Siebrand Mazeland changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||em...@dominikmatus.cz
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #76 from Philippe Verdy ---
importing glyphs from some free fonts is not enough; some scripts need that you
also borrow the OpenType features allowing their contextual selection (for now
only the Arabic contextual forms are borrows,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #75 from Santhosh Thottingal ---
Nux, (In reply to comment #68)
> Hi. Not sure what you've used for generating the font, but if you've used
> fontsquirrel.com, then consider the following:
> 1. Generate SVG font (if you're not doing
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #74 from Nux ---
> For this project, just uploading the generated fonts into the MediaWiki
repository is clearly not enough, there should exist a full project containing
or documenting the build tools used to perform these conversio
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #73 from Philippe Verdy ---
Also the "missinglyph" item of the SVG is just mapped with an advance-width
equal to the space character; it has no path for the glyph itself, where it
should have a path drawing an empty box in that spac
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #72 from Nux ---
I don't why are those glyphs present but I think they won't be used anyway if
they don't have `unicode` attribute. If someone knows for sure they are not
needed, then I guess they can be removed. BTW selecting chara
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #71 from Philippe Verdy ---
Note that the SVG version includes 76 glyphs which are not selectable at all
(they have no unicode attribute and no id attribute referenced by some assigned
glyph with script features. I wonder how they c
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #70 from Thomas Bertels ---
(In reply to comment #69)
> Created attachment 13871 [details]
Nice! Thank you Maciej!
It looks great on Windows XP too (Windows 7 was the worse).
Now, could we replace the current
https://bits.wikimed
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #68 from Nux ---
Hi. Not sure what you've used for generating the font, but if you've used
fontsquirrel.com, then consider the following:
1. Generate SVG font (if you're not doing it already).
2. Use ttf above woff.
3. Preserve orig
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
praveenp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me.prav...@gmail.com
--- Comment #67 from p
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #66 from Dereckson ---
Here some screenshot on Firefox 25, Windows LCD rendering (*).
12px (en.wikipedia): http://files.espace-win.org/2013/Capture.PNG
13px (fr.wikipedia): http://files.espace-win.org/2013/Capture2.PNG
(*) There a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #65 from Bartosz Dziewoński ---
Then the font in this one sidebar section would be larger than in all the other
ones, which is going to look even more silly than the current state. I suggest
not doing that.
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Dereckson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dereck...@espace-win.org
--- Comment #64 f
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #63 from Erwin Dokter ---
(In reply to comment #62)
> The critical bad rendering occurs:
> * when rendering font sizes below 13px (for example, small text: you loose
> important pixels: don't render lists of languags with a reduced
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #62 from Philippe Verdy ---
Note that it's true that the Autonym font lacks hinting; but my test page
demonstrates that it should not be used with all CSS styles, but that it works
quite well within some limits
(font-size:13px;font-
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #61 from Philippe Verdy ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> Against this common sense ULS was designed to load webfonts for a huge bunch
> of
> languages. Therefore we started to load additional font support for every
> Wikipedia user,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #60 from Philippe Verdy ---
Note that the rendering of the Autonym font may be tweaked with ULS, provided
that the span using the autonym class also sets the lang attribute (as it
should).
So you can use ULS to select another suppo
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Philippe Verdy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||verd...@wanadoo.fr
--- Comment #59 fr
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #58 from Michael Zajac ---
(In reply to comment #57)
> (In reply to comment #41)
> > (In reply to comment #37)
> > > Autonym (which will by definition never be as good as a native font like
> > > Arial on Windows)
> >
> > I don’t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #57 from Erwin Dokter ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> (In reply to comment #37)
> > Autonym (which will by definition never be as good as a native font like
> > Arial on Windows)
>
> I don’t understand the logic of this. Arial is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #56 from Erwin Dokter ---
(In reply to comment #52)
> Created attachment 13824 [details]
> ENWP Sidebar, Windows 8, IE 10
Seems like ordinary Arial. In other words, it does not use Autonym in this
screenshot.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #55 from Liangent ---
(In reply to comment #54)
> (In reply to comment #51)
> > Screenshot on a default Windows 8, IE 10
> >
> > Good news? It seems better on Windows 8.
>
> From your screen-shots, it seems there's something funda
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #54 from Eduard Braun ---
(In reply to comment #51)
> Screenshot on a default Windows 8, IE 10
>
> Good news? It seems better on Windows 8.
From your screen-shots, it seems there's something fundamentally wrong with
your font rend
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #53 from Thomas Bertels ---
(In reply to comment #51)
> Good news? It seems better on Windows 8.
Could you test it with either Firefox/Chrome/Opera to make sure it's not just
IE?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #52 from Liangent ---
Created attachment 13824
--> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=13824&action=edit
ENWP Sidebar, Windows 8, IE 10
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #51 from Liangent ---
Created attachment 13823
--> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=13823&action=edit
Screenshot on a default Windows 8, IE 10
Good news? It seems better on Windows 8.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|All |Windows 7
--- Comment #50 from Nemo ---
Also s
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
MZMcBride changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|All |PC
Summary|Language names blurr
44 matches
Mail list logo
