https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
PiRSquared17 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |High
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.wikimedia.
|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||parser
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
--- Comment #13 from Gerrit Notification Bot ---
Change 118959 had a related patch set uploaded by Nemo bis:
[WIP] Display outdated page translations as such, without removing them
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/118959
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
Gerrit Notification Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |PATCH_TO_REVIEW
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
--- Comment #12 from Nemo ---
(In reply to Quim Gil from comment #11)
> Could someone test what happens when you revert the patch, changing the line
> 748 to define a span instead of a div? (sorry, I'm not a git ninja either)
That's not the cu
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
--- Comment #11 from Quim Gil ---
I'm not a HTML/CSS ninja, but let me share this hypothesis anyway:
Bug 44328 - Replace outdated translations with source text on translation pages
The problem reported:
"When a section of a translated page i
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
--- Comment #10 from Nemo ---
(In reply to Niklas Laxström from comment #9)
> (2) is a requirement. Whether it is done by removing the tag and instructed
> in documentation or somehow else is an implementation detail.
Good. Then it's satisfied
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
--- Comment #9 from Niklas Laxström ---
(2) is a requirement. Whether it is done by removing the tag and instructed in
documentation or somehow else is an implementation detail.
If we just revert, then we will also have to solve all the incons
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
--- Comment #8 from Nemo ---
(In reply to Niklas Laxström from comment #7)
> 1) Access to translation, even if possibly outdates
> 2) Showing original text when translation source has changed in significant
> ways
> 3) Simple, intuitive user in
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
--- Comment #7 from Niklas Laxström ---
Can we come up with a solution which works for everyone? I see bunch of
(conflicting?) requirements, including:
1) Access to translation, even if possibly outdates
2) Showing original text when translatio
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
--- Comment #6 from Quim Gil ---
Even in a small wiki with only a bunch of translators that know each other,
many times I'm refraining myself from updating source (English) texts with
small improvements because
a) I don't want that such small
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
--- Comment #5 from Nemo ---
Not only the legal team. Solving this bug would remove a huge source of
distress for translation administrators, who – in their routine work of marking
new versions for translation – are regularly accused of acts of
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58429
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Option to display outdated |Translation pages: display
|t
14 matches
Mail list logo
