https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
--- Comment #11 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 112500 abandoned by Manybubbles:
Don't search text wrapped in nosearch class
Reason:
Replacing in favor of I70be621d2702409d88befd8f7ba0936cbc4912ef.
It won't
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
--- Comment #7 from Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org ---
The biggest case I can think of for excluding text from search is the license
information on commons. Please take that as an example. Maybe it is the only
example I think it
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
--- Comment #8 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to Nik Everett from comment #7).
[...] 3. Entirely self serving: given #1, the contents of the license take
up an
awful lot of space for very little benefit. [...]
Is the RDF
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
--- Comment #9 from Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Nemo from comment #8)
Are those already ignored due to the display:none?
No. That would be nice, and I imagine we could detect the naïve case of it
being in a style= tag
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |NEW
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
jeremyb bugzilla+org.wikime...@tuxmachine.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
jeremyb bugzilla+org.wikime...@tuxmachine.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |NEW
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||federicol...@tiscali.it
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsals...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
--- Comment #1 from Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org ---
I'd like to get to work on this but I'm not really sure what classes we
normally use for hidden text.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
--- Comment #2 from Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com ---
I'm wondering if we should avoid using any existing classes for this and go a
completely different route. Introduce something like a nosearch class and
document it as being completely
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
--- Comment #4 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 112500 had a related patch set uploaded by Manybubbles:
Don't search text wrapped in nosearch class
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/112500
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60484
Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
15 matches
Mail list logo
