Hi John, all
2016-07-29 15:54 GMT+02:00 John Erling Blad :
> In general this has more implications than simple singular/plural forms of
> units. Agreement/concord/congruence is the proper term. In some language
> you will even change the form given the distance to the thing you are
> measuring or
Stas, Thomas, John, Markus, Lydia and Wikidatans,
What happens when one develops structured Wiktionary (
https://www.wiktionary.org/), as linked open data for every part of every
word and their sounds, perhaps as Qitems in Wikidata, in Wikipedia's 358
languages, and planning for all 7,943 language
Hi,
Would it be possible to have a link to the project(s) that have a focus on a
given topic, when editing an item. For instance (because that's what I'm mostly
interested in ;-), it would be useful to have a link to
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Informatics/FLOSS
whe
In general this has more implications than simple singular/plural forms of
units. Agreement/concord/congruence is the proper term. [1] In some
language you will even change the form given the distance to the thing you
are measuring or counting, even depending on the type of thing you are
measuring
My two cents : this is a job to do in conjunction with structured
wiktionary, who will be able to deal with lexical entities.
We however have some properties here and there to deal with such languages
issues to deal with this inside Wikidata, female form of occupation name
for example, but the log
Hi!
> You mean the MediaWiki message processing code? This would probably be
Yes, exactly.
> powerful enough for units as well, but it works based on message strings
> that look a bit like MW template calls. Someone has to enter such
> strings for all units (and languages). This would be doable
