Most middle-sized towns in Europe have municipal collections that reach
into the tens of thousands of objects. I am totally on board to allow this,
and also to allow municipality WLM identifiers (so not just country
identifiers for heritage, but also at the local level)
Let's do it!
On Sun, Aug 2
Hoi,
There is only one ID that truly identifies an object uniquely and, that is
the ID of the collection involved. It is an happy occasion when they all
match but they will not always match. Storing IDs is not a big problem, in
the end we will find that having them leads to harmonisation. Consequen
Yes I got the gist of that hint and am still thinking about it. I am still
not sure, but probably yes. It's the same reasoning as for the WLM unique
identifiers btw. I am leaning towards at least one set of identifiers per
country. We can think of these heritage sites after all as objects in the
co
As I hinted on project chat: if we create a property for MoMA IDs, we really
have to be consistent and create property for all art collections that use
persistent IDs and of which we have items on Wikidata.
I think we (will) have hundreds of these.
Are we OK with that - having hundreds of museum
Hoi,
Good job ... went there to approve ... but as there is nothing to approve I
do.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 July 2015 at 16:27, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 14:52, Magnus Manske
> wrote:
>
> > Everyone vote for MoMA property creation please ;-)
> >
> >
> https://www.wikidata.or
Always nice to have friends in high places ;-)
Added to Mix'n'match, synced the 5 matched items over.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:28 PM Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 14:52, Magnus Manske
> wrote:
>
> > Everyone vote for MoMA property creation please ;-)
> >
> >
> https://www.wikidata.
On 30 July 2015 at 14:52, Magnus Manske wrote:
> Everyone vote for MoMA property creation please ;-)
>
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Authority_control#MoMA_artwork
I took the liberty of speedily creating that - P2014
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthew
Everyone vote for MoMA property creation please ;-)
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Authority_control#MoMA_artwork
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:33 PM Magnus Manske
wrote:
> Wow. Their (Medium) "Twitter sign-in" want access to everything short of
> my password. Their Google
Wow. Their (Medium) "Twitter sign-in" want access to everything short of my
password. Their Google sign-in doesn't work. I'm not on Facebook.
Trying direct sign-up now...
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:55 PM Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 11:33, Magnus Manske
> wrote:
> > FYI: Imported in
On 30 July 2015 at 11:33, Magnus Manske wrote:
> FYI: Imported into mix'n'match:
> https://tools.wmflabs.org/mix-n-match/?mode=catalog_details&catalog=82
Suggest you drop a comment to that effect, on MOMA's blog post:
https://medium.com/digital-moma/thousands-of-exhausted-things-or-why-we-
FYI: Imported into mix'n'match:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/mix-n-match/?mode=catalog_details&catalog=82
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:48 AM Paul Houle wrote:
> Way Cool!
>
> From a business model perspective, museums have always been in a good
> position to publish open data since it is all about ge
Way Cool!
>From a business model perspective, museums have always been in a good
position to publish open data since it is all about getting donations,
getting people in the door and the various cultural tie-ups.
The blog does point out another issue which is that museum people have long
been ri
The Museum of Modern Art of New York has published a CSV on GitHub
containing the data of its entire collection under a CC0 license.
https://github.com/MuseumofModernArt/collection
They have blogged about it.
https://medium.com/digital-moma/thousands-of-exhausted-things-or-why-we-dedicated-moma-s
13 matches
Mail list logo
