Hi!
As a practical suggestion for helping:
http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/random_item_without_instance.php
I would also suggest
http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/important_blank_items.php which
lists most linked items from wikis that have no connection to other
items whatsoever.
Hi!
If an item has no statements, no sitelinks, and isn't used anywhere, how do
you
tell what it even *is*? The label only? Is that sufficient and/or useful? What
would be lost by deleting it? Maybe, if it has labels in many languages, with
Unless its purpose if obvious (i.e.
And when you look at the discussion, you see that the message that
you are referring to said:
If you have an item that says someone whon a nobel prize, but not
when or which, and also does *noit* have a label, that items is quite
useless; it'S impossible to tell which person it is even
And what if Q9 does not have a label? How am I going from the
information Q9 won the Nobel Prize in Literature to Q9
is/is not Patrick Modiano?
André
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Not enough data. Q9 may have a label that
On 2015-05-30 20:42, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
The problems are often items which never had any links. Many of them
are
spam, but some of them can be used for structural needs and can be
kept.
If they are structural (like wikidata-only classes, etc.) shouldn't
they
have some incoming
Hoi,
Given that 19,21% of all items have no statements whatsoever, it is a bit
premature to come with such notions. Let us first fix this and then
consider what we do not need.
Thanks,
GerardM
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/stats.php?reverse
On 31 May 2015 at 16:12, Romaine Wiki
Yaroslav thanks for posting - I had no idea. Thanks for your work on this
too
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru
wrote:
On 2015-05-29 17:42, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Hi Jane, hi Romaine,
I think we agree that valuable information should be kept if at all
Not quite sure...
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:33 PM Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 12:39, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com
wrote:
(in this case, it appears to be the castle of Żagań, once located in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%BBaga%C5%84 )
Hi Markus,
Indeed yes, that is also an issue. It can happen with new articles and with
older articles.
Some articles get deleted as they are a duplicate of another article, or
worse written (to bad to keep), or not an encyclopaedic subject to have in
an encyclopaedia.
Every day, on nl-wiki we
I think this is a problem with the current workflow for creating articles,
which starts with Wikipedia, then finishes with Wikidata, though it should
probably be the other way around. This problem will eventually solve
itself, given enough time, although I believe we still have lots of poorly
10 matches
Mail list logo
