Re: [Wikidata] Running bots on Wikidata lexemes

2018-12-04 Thread Lydia Pintscher
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:16 PM Amir E. Aharoni wrote: > I'd also say that it would be a very good idea NOT TO RUN BOTS THAT ADD > GRAMMATICAL FORMS. > > Wiktionaries in some languages have templates and modules that show things > like verb conjugation and noun declension. If I'm allowed to

Re: [Wikidata] Running bots on Wikidata lexemes

2018-12-04 Thread Amir E. Aharoni
I'd also say that it would be a very good idea NOT TO RUN BOTS THAT ADD GRAMMATICAL FORMS. Wiktionaries in some languages have templates and modules that show things like verb conjugation and noun declension. If I'm allowed to fantasize, the ideal thing to do would be to have something like a

Re: [Wikidata] Running bots on Wikidata lexemes

2018-12-04 Thread Thad Guidry
Finn, I wouldn't upload the entire DanNet initially but instead something more manageable that you can verify...say 50-100 Lexemes, Statements, Senses, etc. and get community feedback...then go for larger. Thad https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/ On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:58 AM Lydia

[Wikidata] Running bots on Wikidata lexemes

2018-12-04 Thread fn
I recall reading in an announcement for Wikidata lexemes that we should not (yet) run (large) import jobs for Wikidata lexemes. I cannot immediately find that message. I am wondering what the attitude of the Wikidata developers and users are wrt. import jobs for Wikidata lexemes?