[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2023-01-29 Thread Lydia_Pintscher
Lydia_Pintscher added a parent task: T314081: [EPIC] Reorganize sections of Wikidata Item and Property pages . TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T295275 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Lydia_Pintscher Cc: Masssly,

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-18 Thread Salgo60
Salgo60 added a comment. > In general, I think we should rather restrict the ability to add, Another pattern used in iNaturalist is that you let more people confirm an observation and then set research Grade

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-16 Thread Quiddity
Quiddity updated the task description. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T295275 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Quiddity Cc: Tagishsimon, PKM, Naseweis520, ArthurPSmith, Streetmathematician, Csisc, Ayack, Tpt,

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-16 Thread ArthurPSmith
ArthurPSmith added a comment. Good points from @MisterSynergy and others above. One other case I often run into is problems caused by item merges; if both original items had P279 statements this can cause significant trouble (for example it is a

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-16 Thread MisterSynergy
MisterSynergy added a comment. Good to see this problem being addressed. Some remarks: - As much as I am aware, we do not fail the classification job completely. It's the P279 /subclass-of hierarchy which some refer to as the "Wikidata ontology"

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-16 Thread Streetmathematician
Streetmathematician added a comment. I have commented elsewhere , on the fact that it appears to me to be a very difficult task to collect "classifying Properties", but I'd like to comment

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-15 Thread Tagishsimon
Tagishsimon added a comment. It's always a huge red flag, when assessing a proposed change, to read a user story which is self-evidently detached from reality. This and other klaxons of doom are found in this proposal. 1. It's at best a polite fiction to suggest there are any users who

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-15 Thread ArthurPSmith
ArthurPSmith added a comment. Hmm - I agree with the above that P2860 should not be on this list. If we are including the "partitive" properties like P361 and P527

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-15 Thread Csisc
Csisc added a comment. To clarify, I give an example of a Wikidata property that can be included there according to our discussion: "Instance of". - If X is an instance of Y, Y cannot be an instance of X. So, the property is taxonomic. - Any item can be the subject of "instance of".

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-15 Thread Csisc
Csisc added a comment. We already discussed this as Data Engineering and Semantics Research Unit, University of Sfax. We should include there the basic and taxonomic properties. By Basic, we mean elementary and generic relation types. By Taxonomic, we mean non-symmetric relation

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-15 Thread Tpt
Tpt added a comment. It's a great idea! I just believe P2860 (cites work) should be removed from the list. It's definitely not a classifying property. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T295275 EMAIL PREFERENCES

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] T295275: Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties

2021-11-15 Thread Manuel
Manuel renamed this task from "Dedicated section on Wikidata Item pages for classifying properties" to "Dedicated section on Wikidata Item and Property pages for classifying Properties". Manuel updated the task description. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T295275 EMAIL